Neighborhood Disinvestment, Abandonment, and Crime Dynamics

REFERENCES

• Baxter, V., & Lauria, M. (2000). Residential mortgage foreclosure and neighborhood change. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 675–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellair, P. (1997). Social interaction and community crime. Criminology, 35, 677–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellair, P., & Browning, C. (2010). Contemporary disorganization research: An assessment and further test of the systemic model of neighborhood crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 496–521. doi:10.1177/0022427810375578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Perkins, D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Perkins, D., & Brown, G. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, A., & Hakim, S. (1989). Does crime affect property values? Canadian Appraiser, 33, 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bursik, R. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26, 519–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, W., Schill, M., & Wachter, S. (1998). Polarization, public housing, and racial minorities in U.S. cities. Urban Studies, 35, 1889–1911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, K. (2000). The racial context of white mobility: An individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research, 29, 223–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, R., Glusker, A., & Bridges, G. (1999). A tale of three cities: Labor markets and homicide. Sociological Focus, 32, 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, L. (2010). Foreclosure, vacancy and crime. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Damron, G. (2012, October 28). One Detroit neighborhood now safer for schoolkids. Detroit Free Press, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Dawsey, C., & Lawrence, E. (2012, September 30). Volunteers needed: Help board up vacant houses to protect kids. Detroit Free Press, p. 4A.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, N., & Massey, D. (1991). Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multiethnic world: U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970–1980. Demography, 28, 41–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detroit Residential Parcel Survey (DRPS). (2010). Citywide report for vacant and occupied housing. Available at http://www.detroitparcelsurvey.org/
   Google Scholar
• Detroit Works Project Long Term Planning. (2013). Detroit Future City. Available at http://detroitworksproject.com/for-detroit-to-work-we-need-action-today/
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, M., Basmajian, C., Alter, R., & Law, B. (2005, November). Early detection of changing neighborhood indicators. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R., & Haurin, D. (2003). The social and private microlevel consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 401–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1981). Neighborhoods and urban development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I., Lacoe, J., & Sharygin, C. (2012). Do foreclosures cause crime? Journal of Urban Economics, 74, 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I., Lens, M., & O’Regan, K. (2011). American murder mystery revisited: Do housing voucher households cause crime? New York: New York University, Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Elrick, M. (2012, March 29). Crime is Detroiters’ no. 1 concern, poll shows. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved April 22, 2012 from http://www.freep.com/article/201…329/NEWS01/203290509/Crime-is-Detroiters-No-1-concern-poll-shows
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. Retrieved May 28, 2012, from http://www.ucrdatatool.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, M., & Boba, R. (2010). Crime and everyday life (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (1987). Homeowners and neighborhood reinvestment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (1990a). Neighborhood racial change, segregationist sentiments, and affirmative marketing policies. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 344–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (1990b). White flight from integrated neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 27, 385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2111–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2012). Driving Detroit: The quest for respect in the Motor City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Cutsinger, J., & Lim, U. (2007). Are neighborhoods self-stabilizing? Exploring endogenous dynamics. Urban Studies, 44, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Mincy, R. (1993). Understanding the changing fortunes of metropolitan neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 4, 303–352.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Mincy, R., & Tobin, M. (1997). The disparate racial neighborhood impacts of metropolitan restructuring. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 797–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Peacock, S. (1985). Urban gentrification: Evaluating alternative indicators. Social Indicators Research, 18, 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Tatian, P. (2009) Modeling housing appreciation dynamics in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, R., & Lee, Y. (2010). Do foreclosures increase crime? Working Paper 2010-05. Washington, DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Center for Financial Research.
   Google Scholar
• Grigsby, W., Maclennan, D., Baratz, M., & Galster, G. (1987) The dynamics of neighborhood change and decline. London: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A. (1972). Urban history, population densities, and higher status residential location. Economic Geography, 48, 375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, A. (1973). Urban growth and population densities. Demography, 10, 53–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, A. (1974). Neighborhood life cycles and social status. Economic Geography, 50, 228–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, L. (2002). Criminal opportunity theory and the relationship between poverty and property crime. Sociological Spectrum, 22, 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, L. (2005). Extremely poor neighborhoods and homicide. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 1418–1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, 271–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, C., & Belsky, E. (2008). The homeownership experience of low-income and minority households: A review and synthesis of the literature. Cityscape, 10(2), 5–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. (2007a). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72, 659–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. (2007b). Income inequality, race, and place: Does the distribution of race and class within neighborhoods affect crime rates? Criminology, 45, 665–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. (2010). A dynamic view of neighborhoods: The reciprocal relationship between crime and neighborhood structural characteristics. Social Problems, 57, 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J., Tita, G., & Greenbaum, R. (2009). Drive-bys and trade-ups: Examining the directionality of the crime and residential instability relationship. Social Forces, 87, 1777–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J., & Yates, D. (2009). Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology, 47, 619–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J., & Yates, D. (2011). Ghettos, thresholds, and crime. Criminology, 49, 955–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006). The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighbourhood crime. Housing Studies, 21, 851–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C., Wallace, D., & Hedberg, E. C. (2011). A longitudinal assessment of the impact of foreclosure on neighborhood crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.117/022427811431155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivo, L., & Peterson, R (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75, 619–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivo, L., Peterson, R., Rizzo, H., & Reynolds, J. (1998). Race, segregation, and the concentration of disadvantage: 1980–1990. Social Problems, 45, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, E., Koons, B., & Taylor, R. (1998). Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks. Justice Quarterly, 15, 121–149.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Baxter, V. (1999). Residential mortgage foreclosure and racial transition in New Orleans. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 757–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., & Wood, P. (1991). Is neighborhood succession place-specific? Demography, 28, 21–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Rosenblatt, E. (1997). Can urban indicators predict home price appreciation? Real Estate Economics, 25, 81–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, U., & Galster, G. (2009). The dynamics of neighborhood property crime rates. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 925–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, M., Manturuk, K., & Quercia, R. (2012). Sense of community and informal social control among lower income households: The role of homeownership and collective efficacy in reducing subjective neighborhood crime and disorder. American Journal of Community Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9507-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2012). Laying the groundwork for change: Demolition, urban strategy and policy reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.brookings.edu/˜/media/research/files/papers/2012/9/24%20land%20use%20demolition%20mallach/24%20land%20use%20demolition%20mallach
   Google Scholar
• Mast, B., & Wilson, R. (2013). Housing choice vouchers and crime in Charlotte, NC. Housing Policy Debate, 23, 559–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, T., & Holloway, S. (2000). Race, crime and public housing in Atlanta. Social Forces, 79, 707–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miethe, T., & Meier, R. (1994). Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J., & Sampson, R. (1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 76, 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J., Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottensmann, J., & Gleeson, M. (1992). The movement of whites and blacks into racially mixed neighborhoods: Chicago, 1960–1980. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 645–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottensmann, J., Good, D., & Gleeson, M. (1990). The impact of net migration on neighborhood racial composition. Urban Studies, 27, 705–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D., & Taylor, R. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 63–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D., Wandersman, A., Rich, R., & Taylor, R. (1993). The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plerhoples, C. (2012). The effect of vacant building demolitions on crime under depopulation. Economics job market paper. Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S., Rich, M., Hendey, L., Parilla, J., & Galster, G. (2012). Public housing transformation and crime: Making the case for responsible relocation. Cityscape, 14(3), 137–160.
   Google Scholar
• Poyner, B. (1983). Design against crime: Beyond defensible space. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., Van Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2000). The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research. Washington, DC: Research Institute for Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Roncek, D. (1981). Dangerous places: Crime and residential environment. Social Forces, 60, 74–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C., & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 258–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, J., Galster, G., Butler, R., & Pitkin, J. (1991). The maze of urban housing markets: Theory, evidence and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. (1989). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53, 766–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., & Groves, W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation of public space: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328): 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, W., & Marsh, E. (1980). The tipping-point model: Prediction of change in the racial composition of Cleveland, Ohio neighborhoods, 1940–1970. Environment and Planning A, 12, 385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. E., Susin, S., & Voicu, I. (2003). Has falling crime driven New York City’s real estate boom? Journal of Housing Research, 14, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. (1989). Communities, crime, and neighborhood organization. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spelman, W. (1993). Abandoned buildings: Magnets for crime? Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, R., Taylor, D. G., & Dunham, J. (1984). Paths of neighborhood change: Race and crime in urban America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Gottfredson, S., & Browner, S. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 303–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Shumaker, S., & Gottfredson, S. (1985). Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiment. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 2, 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. (1996). Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1978). A note on the value of crime control: Evidence from the property market. Journal of Urban Economics, 5, 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tita, G., Petras, T., & Greenbaum, R. (2006). Crime and residential choice: A neighborhood level analysis of the impact of crime on housing prices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). American FactFinder 2. Available at http://factfinder2.census.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Warner, B., & Pierce, G. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime. Criminology, 31, 493–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, B., & Rountree, P. W. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control. Social Problems, 44, 520–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., Galster, G., & Verma, N. (forthcoming). Home foreclosures as a leading indicator of neighborhood dynamics. Journal of the American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S., Galster, G., & Verma, N. (2013). Home foreclosures and neighborhood crime dynamics. Housing Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02673037.2013.803041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Kelling, G. (1983). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly (March), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & Hammel, D. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 711–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & Hammel, D. (2000). Capital’s metropolis: Chicago and the transformation of American housing policy. Geografiska Annaler, 82, 181–206.
   Google Scholar