Creative Cities: A 10-Year Research Agenda

REFERENCES

• Alvarez, M. (2005). There’s nothing informal about it: Participatory arts within the cultural ecology of Silicon Valley. San Jose, CA: Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley. http://www.ci-sv.org/pdf/MAlvarez_PA_study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M. (2007). Fostering cultural citizenship: How can and should we support the informal arts? Presentation at the annual Americans for the Arts Meetings, Las Vegas, NV, June 1.
   Google Scholar
• ArtPlace. (2012a). Vibrancy indicators. http://www.artplaceamerica.org/articles/vibrancy-indicators/
   Google Scholar
• ArtPlace. (2012b). Vibrancy definitions. http://www.artplaceamerica.org/loi/
   Google Scholar
• Bedoya, R. (2013). Placemaking and the politics of belonging and dis-belonging. Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 24, 20–21, 32. http://www.giarts.org/article/placemaking-and-politics-belonging-and-dis-belonging
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, W. (1989). The producer services and economic development in the United States: The last decade. Final report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, April.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, W., Fowler, C., and Andreoli, D. (2008). The economic impact of music in Seattle and King County. Seattle, WA: Mayor’s Office of Film and Music. http://www.seattle.gov/music/impactstudy.htm
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, W., & GMS Research Corporation. (2011). An economic impact study of arts, cultural, and scientific organizations in the Central Puget Sound region. Seattle, WA: Arts Fund. http://www.artsfund.org
   Google Scholar
• Blau, J. (1989). The shape of culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A., & Kushner, R. (2001). Cultural districts and urban development. International Journal of Arts Management, 3, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2012). All the world’s a stage: Venues and settings, and the role they play in shaping patterns of arts participation. Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 23/2, Summer. http://www.giarts.org/article/all-worlds-stage
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Novak, J. (2007). Assessing the intrinsic benefits of a live performance. WolfBrown, January. http://wolfbrown.com/images/books/ImpactStudyFinalVersionFullReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Novak-Leonard, J., & Kitchener, A. (2008). Cultural engagement in California’s Inland Regions. San Francisco: WolfBrown.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Novak-Leonard, J., & Gilbride, S. (2011). Getting in on the act: How arts groups are creating opportunities for active participation. San Francisco: The James Irvine Foundation. http://irvine.org/images/stories/pdf/grantmaking/Getting-in-on-the-act-2011OCT19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bye, C. (2002). A new angle: Arts development in the suburbs. Minneapolis, MN: The McKnight Foundation. http://www.mcknight.org/arts/angle.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (1993). Interregional migration of defense scientists and engineers to the gunbelt during the 1980s. Economic Geography, 69, 204–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, K., & Jacobus, R. (2009). Retail trade as a route to neighborhood revitalization. Urban and regional policy and its effects, Volume II. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution-Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., & Rightor, N. (2010). The creative economy as ‘big business’: Evaluating state strategies to lure film makers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., & Storper, M. (1986). The city as studio, the world as back lot: The impact of vertical disintegration on the location of the motion picture industry. Environment and Planning (D), Society and Space, 4, 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, L. (2008). In and out of the dark: A theory of audience behavior from Sophocles to spoken word. In W. Ivey & S. Tepper, (Eds.), (Engaging art: The next great transformation of America’s cultural life (pp. 103–124). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Currid, E. (2007). The Warhol economy: How fashion, art and music drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. (2013). Are artists to blame for gentrification? Or would SoHo, Chelsea, and Williamsburg have gentrified without them? Slate, October 15. http://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2013/10/are_artists_to_blame_for_gentrification_or_would_soho_chelsea_and_bushwick.html
   Google Scholar
• Dean, C., Donnellan, C., & Pratt, A. (2010). Tate Modern: Pushing the limits of regeneration. City, Culture and Society, 1, 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche, R., & Ryan, C. G. (1984). The fine art of gentrification. October, 31, 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. (2000.) The politics of bread and circuses. Urban Affairs Review, 35(3), 316–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M., Barff, R., & Markusen, A. (1993). Defense spending and interregional labor migration. Economic Geography, 69, 182–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 4, 959–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feser, E. (2003). What regions do rather than make: A proposed set of knowledge-based occupation clusters. Urban Studies, 40, 1937–1958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002a). Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002b). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 92, 743–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002c). The rise of the creative class. New York, Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, T. (2013). Dead end on shakin’ street. The Baffler, 22. http://www.thebaffler.com/past/dead_end_on_shakin_street
   Google Scholar
• Gadwa, A. (2010). How Artist Spaces Matter: Impacts and Insights from Artspace Project’s Developments. Minneapolis, MN: Metris Arts Consulting, January. http://metrisarts.com/2012/07/13/how-artist-spaces-matters/
   Google Scholar
• Gadwa Nicodemus, A. (2012). Cultural plan backs up creative capital branding: A creative city initiative case study on Providence, RI. Paper presented at the Hong Kong Institute of Contemporary Culture, Chinese Creative Industries Forum. http://metrisarts.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ProvidenceFullCaseStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gadwa Nicodemus, A. (2013a). Artists and gentrification: Sticky myths, slippery realities. Createquity, April 5. http://createquity.com/2013/04/artists-and-gentrification-sticky-myths-slippery-realities.html
   Google Scholar
• Gadwa Nicodemus, A. (2013b). Fuzzy vibrancy: Creative placemaking as ascendant U. S. cultural policy. Cultural Trends, 22(3–4), 213–222. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09548963.2013.817653#
   Google Scholar
• Gadwa, A., & Muessig. A. (2011). How Artist Spaces Matter II: The Riverside, Tashiro Kaplan and Insights from Five Artspace Case Studies and Four Cities. Minneapolis: Artspace Projects and Metris Arts Consulting, July. http://metrisarts.com/2012/07/13/how-art-spaces-matter-ii/
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, A. (2008). The evolution of arts and cultural districts, In Cherbo, J., Stewart, R. A., and Wyszomirski, M. J., (Eds), Understanding the arts and creative sector in the United States, (pp. 129–142). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance. (2008). 2008 Portfolio. Philadelphia, PA: Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance. http://www.philaculture.org/research/reports/2008-portfolio
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M., & Hunt, G. L. (1984). Migration and interregional employment redistribution in the United States. American Economic Review, 74, 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M., & Hunt, G. L. (1989). Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. (2008). Looking beyond image and tourism: The role of flagship cultural projects in local arts development. Planning Practice and Research, 4, 495–516.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. (2010). Beyond Bilbao: Rethinking flagship cultural development and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. (2011). “Art spaces in community and economic development: Connections to neighborhoods, artists, and the cultural economy.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., Foster, N., & Murdoch III, J. (2013). Gentrification and the artistic dividend: The role of the arts in neighborhood change. Working paper, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Arlington, TX: University of Texas as Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2007). Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization: A survey of U.S. cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13, 349–370.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach C., & Seman, M. (2013). The cultural economy in recession: Examining the U.S. experience, Cities, 33, 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., & Silver, D. (Eds.) (2012). The politics of urban cultural policy: Global perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, A. (2012). In support of individual artists. Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 23(1). http://www.giarts.org/article/support-individual-artists
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37, 639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammett, C., & Shoval. N. (2003). Museums as flagships of urban development. In L. Hoffman, S. Fainstein, and D. Judd (Eds.), Cities and visitors: Regulating people, markets and city space (pp. 217–236). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, W. (1956). Location and space-economy. Cambridge, MA and New York, NY: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology & John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Isserman, N., & Markusen, A. (2013). Shaping the future through narrative: The third sector, arts and culture. International Regional Science Review, 36, 115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey, B. (2008). Arts, Inc: How greed and neglect have destroyed our cultural rights. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. R. (2012). Developing artist-driven spaces in marginalized communities: Reflections and implications for the field. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. http://www.giarts.org/sites/default/files/Developing-Artist-Driven-Spaces-Marginalized-Communities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. R., & Herranz, J. (2002). Culture counts in communities: A framework for measurement. Washington, DC: the Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. R., Kabwasa-Green, F., & Herranz, J. (2006). Cultural vitality in communities: Interpretation and indicators. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, December. http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=311392
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. (2013). The resiliency of property-led arts economic development: Exploring the innovative but untimely partnership between the Seattle Art Museum and Washington Mutual, Cities, forthcoming. http://works.bepress.com/amanda_johnson1/
   Google Scholar
• Killacky, J. (2010). Called to serve. In National Alliance of Media Arts and Culture, Leading creatively: A closer look 2010. http://namac.org/sites/default/files/images_upload/NAMAC-Leading_Creatively.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, A., & Markusen, A. (2012). How small arts organizations differ. Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 23(2), 5–12. http://www.giarts.org/article/working-small-arts-organizations
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M. (1977). The interstate migration of professional and technical workers: A cross-sectional analysis. Review of Business and Economic Research, 12(3), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kreidler, J. (1996). Leverage lost: The nonprofit arts in the post-Ford era. www.inmotionmagazine.com/lost.html
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. (2003). Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 265–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. (2004). Culture, creativity and spatial planning. Abercrombie Lecture. Liverpool, UK: Department of Civic Design.
   Google Scholar
• LaLonde, R., O’Muircheartaigh, C., Perkins, J., Grams, D., English, N., & Joynes, D. C. (2006). Mapping cultural participation in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Cultural Policy Center. http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/publications/MappingCPICweb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Landry, C., Bianchini, F., Ebert, R., Gnad, F., & Kunzman, K. (1996). The creative city in Britain and Germany. London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. (2002). Neo-Bohemia: Art and neighborhood redevelopment in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 517–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. (2004). The neighborhood in cultural production: Material and symbolic resources in the New Bohemia. City and Community, 3, 343–371.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R., & Clark, T. N. (2001). The city as an entertainment machine. In Gotham, K. F. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on urban redevelopment, Research in Urban Sociology, 6, 357–378. Oxford, UK: JAI Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation. (2010). Report on the creative economy of the Los Angeles Region. Los Angeles: Otis College of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigor and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37, 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2004). Targeting occupations in regional and community economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2006). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from the study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1921–1940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2008). Human versus physical capital: Government’s role in regional development. In J. Martinez-Vazquez & F. Vaillancourt (Eds.), Public Policy for Regional Development (pp. 47–65). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2013a). Artists work everywhere. In S. Tepper & E. Longo (Eds.), Special Issue on Careers in the Creative Industries, Work and Occupations, 40(4), 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2013b). Diversifying support for artists, Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 24(3), 46–51. http://www.giarts.org/article/diversifying-support-artists
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2013c). Fuzzy concepts, proxy data: Why indicators won’t track creative placemaking success. International Journal of Urban Sciences, Published on-line, September: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/12265934.2013.836291
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Brown, A. (2013). From audience to participants: New thinking for the performing arts. In V. Borges & P. Costa, (Eds.), (Desvendando o Teatro: Creatividade, Públicos e Território, Special issue of Análise Social). Lisbon, Portugal: CES, Fall, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Evans, B., & Radcliffe, J. (2012). Responding to deindustrialization with arts and culture: Comparing four UK cities. Paper for presentation at the American Collegiate Schools of Planning Meetings, November 1–4. http://www.hhh.umn.edu/projects/prie/PRIE--publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010a). Arts and culture in urban/regional planning: A review and research agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 379–391. http://jpe.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/29/3/379?ijkey=G50IWuhbSeFSA&keytype=ref&siteid=spjpe&utm_source=eNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1J22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010b). Creative placemaking, Washington, DC: Mayors’ Institute on City Design and the National Endowment for the Arts, October, 2010. www.nea.gov/pub/CreativePlacemaking-Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Gadwa Nicodemus, A., & Barbour, E. (2013). The arts, consumption, and innovation in regional development. In M. Rushton (Ed.), Creative communities: Art works in economic development (pp. 36–59). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Gadwa, A., Barbour, E., & Beyers, W. (2011a). California’s Arts and Cultural Ecology. San Francisco: The James Irvine Foundation, September. http://irvine.org/news-insights/publications/arts/arts-ecology-reports
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Gadwa, A., Barbour, E., & Beyers, W. (2011b). California’s Arts and Cultural Ecology: Technical Appendix. San Francisco: The James Irvine Foundation, September. http://irvine.org/news-insights/publications/arts/arts-ecology-reports
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Gadwa, A., & Shifferd, P. (2008). San José Creative Entrepreneur Project: Artists’ Space and Resource Study. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Cultural Innovation, September. http://www.cciarts.org/Publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Gilmore, S., Johnson, A., Levi, T., & Martinez, A. (2006). Crossover: How artists build careers across commercial, nonprofit and community work. Minneapolis, MN: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota. http://irvine.org/news-insights/publications/arts
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Johnson, A. (2006). Artists’ centers: Evolution and impact on careers, neighborhoods and economies. Minneapolis: Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, February. http://www.hhh.umn.edu/projects/prie/PRIE--publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & King, D. (2003). The artistic dividend: The arts’ hidden contributions to regional development. Minneapolis: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota. http://www.hhh.umn.edu/projects/prie/PRIE--publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Schrock. G. (2006a). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43, 1661–1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Schrock. G. (2006b). The distinctive city: Divergent patterns in american urban growth, hierarchy and specialization. Urban Studies, 43, 1301–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, V. (1999). Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. F., Heneghan Ondaatje, E., & Novak. J. L. (2007). Arts and culture in the metropolis: Strategies for sustainability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG477.html
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. F., Heneghan Ondaatje, E., Zakaras, L., & Brooks. A. (2004). Gifts of the muse: Reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG218
   Google Scholar
• McKnight Foundation (Ed.). (2005). You are here: Exploring art in the suburbs. Minneapolis: The McKnight Foundation. http://www.mcknight.org/youarehere/
   Google Scholar
• Mueser, P., & Graves, P. (1995). Examining the role of economic opportunity and amenities in explaining population redistribution. Journal of Urban Economics, 37, 176–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, R. (1971). Migration: Chicken or egg? Southern Economic Journal, 37, 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Endowment for the Arts. (2012). Validating arts and livability indicators in selected communities and developing a user’s guide with case examples and local data sources, Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts, August 23. https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=39f0ca2bec49a35d83076660a0b76992&tab=core&_cview=1
   Google Scholar
• New York-New Jersey Port Authority & the Cultural Assistance Center. (1983). The arts as an industry: Their economic importance to the New York-New Jersey metropolitan region. New York: New York-New Jersey Port Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. (2011). Artists and art workers in the United States. National Endowment for the Arts, Research Note #105, October.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, H. (1979). Using the arts to improve life in the city. Journal of Cultural Economics, 3, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, H., & The Urban Innovation Group. (1979). The arts in the economic life of a city. New York: American Council for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Plane, D., & Jurjevich. J. (2009). Ties that no longer bind: The patterns and repercussions of age-articulated migration up and down the U. S. urban hierarchy. The Professional Geographer, 61, 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, B. (2006). The return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 452–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, A. (2009). Urban regeneration: From the arts ‘feel good’ factor to the cultural economy: a case study of Hoxton, London. Urban Studies, 46, 1041–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project for Public Spaces. (2013). All placemaking is creative: how a shared focus on place builds vibrant destinations, March 4. http://www.pps.org/blog/placemaking-as-community-creativity-how-a-shared-focus-on-place-builds-vibrant-destinations/
   Google Scholar
• Rendon, M., & Markusen, A. (2009). Native artists: Livelihoods, resources, space, gifts. Minneapolis, MN: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota, December. http://www.hhh.umn.edu/projects/prie/PRIE--publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Renski, H., Koo, J., & Feser, E. (2007). Differences in labor versus value chain industry clusters: An empirical investigation, Growth and Change, 38, 364–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothfield, L., Coursey, D., Lee, S., Silver, D., & Norris, W. (2007). Chicago, Music City: Summary report on the music industry in Chicago. Chicago, IL; Cultural Policy Center, University of Chicago. culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/publications/CMCFullReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, M. (2002). Political oversight of arts councils: A comparison of Canada and the United States. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8, 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, M. (2008). A note on the use & misuse of the racial diversity index. Policy Studies Journal, 26, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, M. (2013). Introduction. In M. Rushton (Ed.), Creative communities: Art works in economic development. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, M., & Lewis, G. (2007). Understanding state spending on the arts, 1976–1999. State and Local Government Review, 39, 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sapp, D. (2005). Education, income, location affect Indiana arts participation. Indianapolis: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indiana University—Purdue University, May. http://www.urbancenter.iupui.edu/PubResources/pdf/100_05-C06_Arts.pdf1, accessed July 23, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmiento, C. (2014). Strategies of fire and ICE: Immigration, cultural planning and resistance. Santa Ana, CA: University of California Irvine doctoral dissertation, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J. (2013). Causal agents or canaries in the coal mine? Art galleries and neighborhood change. In M. Rushton (Ed.), Creative communities: Art works in economic development (pp. 12–35). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2005). On Hollywood: The place, the industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, B. (2000). Arts impact studies: A fashionable excess. In by G. Bradford, M. Gary, and G. Wallach (Eds.), The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions and communities (pp. 266–288). New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. (2011). Localization of nonprofit enterprises in the US. Paper presented, North American Regional Science Association Meetings, Miami, Florida, November 11.
   Google Scholar
• Sidford, H. (2011). Fusing arts, culture and social change: High impact strategies for philanthropy. Washington DC: National Center for Responsible Philanthropy, October. http://www.ncrp.org/paib/arts-culture-philanthropy
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. (2011). Age and arts participation: A case against demographic destiny, 2009–2010. http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/siap/completed_projects/age_and_arts_participation.htm1
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M., & Seifert, S. (1998). Community revitalization and the arts in Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Social Impact of the Arts Project. http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/siap/
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M., & Seifert, S. (2007). Cultivating natural cultural districts. Philadelphia, PA: The Reinvestment Fund. http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/siap/
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M., & Seifert, S. (2013). Natural cultural districts: A three-city study, 2010–2012. Philadelphia, PA: Social Impact of the Arts Project, University of Pennsylvania, February. http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/siap/completed_projects/natural_cultural_districts.html
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, E. (1999). Let’s put on a show: Performing arts and urban revitalization in Newark, New Jersey. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, E. (2002). Converting pork into porcelain: Cultural institutions and downtown development. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali, A, Severson, R., & Longoni, M. (2002). Informal arts: Finding cohesion, capacity and other cultural benefits in unexpected places. Chicago: Chicago Center for Arts Policy at Columbia College, June.
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, J. A. (1987). Mozart in the metropolis: The arts coalition and the urban growth machine. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. G., Snowball, J. D., Wymer, C., & Grisolia, J. (2012). A count data travel cost model of theatre demand using aggregate theatre booking data. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36, 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar