Fostering Local Government Collaboration: An Empirical Analysis of Case Studies in Ohio

REFERENCES

• Advisory Committee on Inter-Governmental Relations (ACIR). (1985). Intergovernmental service arrangements for delivering local public services: Update 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66 (Issue Supplement s1), 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C., & Goldsmith, M. (1998). From local government to local governance: And beyond? International Political Science Review, 19, 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigas, F., Elefante, D., & Marti, A. (2009). Geographic information sharing: A regional approach in northern New Jersey, USA. Information Polity, 14, 127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, G. (2007). Intergovernmental collaboration in context: Lessons from a reading of thirteen case studies. New York: New York State Local Government. Available at http://www.nyslocalgov.org/pdf/Intergov_Collaboration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, G., & Nathan, R. (2001). Regionalism and realism: A study of governments in the New York metropolitan area. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berardo, R. (2009). Processing complexity in networks: A study of informal collaboration and its effect on organizational success. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M. (1996). Local government and community-based strategies: Evidence from a national survey of a social problem. American Review of Public Administration, 26, 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S., Ovens, C., Clemans, A., & Seddon, T. (2007). Collaborative working and contested practices: Forming, developing, and sustaining social partnerships in education. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 637–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, D. D., & Russman, M. L. (2007). The legislative playing field: How public policy influences collaboration. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2007(139), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. S. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (Issue Supplement s1), 44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., & Thurmaier, K. (2009). Interlocal agreements as collaborations: An empirical investigation of impetuses, norms, and success. American Review of Public Administration, 9, 536–552.
   Google Scholar
• Citizens Research Council (CRC). (2008). Approaches to consolidating local government services. Detroit: Citizens Research Council of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudas, A., Haney, P., Morris, M., & Russo, P. A., Jr. (2009). Does collaboration beget collaboration? From cooperation to co-production in township government. Oxford, OH: Center for Public Management and Regional Affairs, Miami University. Available at http://www.cpmra.muohio.edu/OTAohio/Commission/OTA/reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Earnst, C., & Yip, J. (2009). Boundary spanning leadership. In T. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference (pp. 87–99). Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Steinacker, A., & Park, H. J. (2009). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, 69, 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, J. F. (2001). Bridging the city–suburb divide: States and the politics of regional cooperation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. D., & Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of management in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R. (2009). Operating across boundaries. In T. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference (pp. 127–140). Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoornbeek, J., Budnik, A., Beechey, T., & Filla, J. (2012). Consolidating health departments in Summit County, Ohio: A one year retrospective. Kent, OH: College of Public Health and Center for Public Administration and Public Policy, Kent State University.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivery, J. (2008). Policy mandated collaboration. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 35(4), 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, W. A. (2009). Ohio’s balanced growth program: A case study of collaboration for planning and policy design. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52, 549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration and Society, 42, 193–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, S.-W., & Feiock, R. C. (2010). Overcoming barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 876–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Are trust and social capital the key to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. In P. A. Sabatier et al. (Eds.), Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management (pp. 233–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., & White, P. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of inter-organizational relationships. Administration and Society, 5(4), 583–601.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., & Olsen, J. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 738–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, H. (1960). An introduction to democratic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, J. W., & Thurmaier. K. (Eds.). (2012). Networked governance: The future of intergovernmental management. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. R., & Hirlinger, M. (1991). Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation. Urban Affairs Review, 27, 128–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously. Public Administration Review, 57, 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1998). Comparative politics: Theory and methods. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. New York: Pinter Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pittinsky, T (Ed.). (2009). Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (1996). Managing across boundaries. In D. F. Kettl & H. B. Milward (Eds.), The state of public management (pp. 145–167). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B., Agranoff, R., Bowman, A., Buntz, G. A., Ott, S., Romzek, B., & Wilson, R. B. (1996). New governance for rural America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, C. (Ed.). (1961). The Federalist Papers. New York: Mentor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B., Greenblatt, A., & Buntin, J. (2005). Governing states and localities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66 (Issue Supplement s1), 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmaier, K., & Wood, C. (2002). Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review, 62, 585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C., Dias, M., Fedorowicz, J., Jacobson, D., Vilvovsky, S., Sawyer, S., & Tyworth, M. (2009). The formation of inter-organizational information sharing networks in public safety: Cartographic insights on rational choice and institutional explanations. Information Polity, 14, 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. H. (2004). Metro-governance in America: A study of the Kansas City region (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. (1974). The metropolitan area problem. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 416, 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar