Double-entry journals: developing an embedded programme of writing development for first year Early Childhood Studies degree students

References

• Allen J and Clarke K (2007). ‘Nurturing supportive learning environments in higher education through study skills: to embed or not to embed?’ International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19, p 1.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett R (2000). Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne E and Marsh J (2007) (eds). Literacy and social inclusion: closing the gap. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett N, Dunne E and Carré C (2000). Skills development in higher education and employment. Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan T (2000). ‘The efficacy of a worldwide web mediated formative assessment’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, pp 193-200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (2005). Children’s workforce strategyLondon: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (2003). The future of higher education. London: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (1997). National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• French A and Clarke K. Writing matters (publication pending).
   Google Scholar
• Ganobcsik-Williams L (2006). Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: theories, practices and model. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs G and Simpson C (2004). ‘Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning’. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, vol 1, pp 3-31.
   Google Scholar
• Grief S, Meyer B and Burgess A (2007). Effective Teaching and learningLondon: NRDC.
   Google Scholar
• Hart E and Bond M (1995). Action-research for health and social care: a guide to practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic R (1998). Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis S and McTaggart R (1988) (eds). The action research planner (3rd edn). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb BC (1992). A national survey of UK undergraduates’ standards of English. London: Queen’s English Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J and Wenger E (1992). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea M and Street B (2006). ‘Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach’ in MR Lea and B Steirer (2000) (eds) Student writing in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea M and Street B (1998). ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’. Studies in Higher Education, vol 23, no 2, pp 157-172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1946). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis TM (2001). Student writing: access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis T and Turner J (2001). ‘Student writing in higher education: contemporary confusion, traditional concerns’. Teaching in Higher Education, 6 (1), pp 57-68.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano RJ (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Available at: http://mt.educarchile.cl/mt/jjbrunner/archives/Instruction.pdf (accessed 5 January 2009).
   Google Scholar
• McNiff J and Whitehead J (2002). Action research principles and practice (2nd edn). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff J, Whitehead J and Lomax P (2003). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia A (2001). ‘Reconstruction in criticality: a discussion on questions, assumptions and interpretation’. Inquiry: critical thinking across the disciplines, XX1: 1, pp 17-31.
   Google Scholar
• Owen G (2003). ‘Harder exams will teach pupils how to argue’. The Times, 12 November.
   Google Scholar
• Prowse S, Duncan N, Hughes J and Burke D (2007). ‘“… do that and I’ll raise your grade”. Innovative module design and recursive feedback’. Teaching in Higher Education, vol 12, no 4, August 2007, pp 437-445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street BV (2001) (ed). Literacy and development: ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Street BV (1995). Social literacies: critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman in association with Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smithers R (2003). ‘Student spelling and grammar at “crisis” levels’. The Guardian. 1 March.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer ET (2007). Action research: a handbook for practioners. Newbery Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton V and Coppard Y (2006). ‘Helping students to write better: pedagogical perspectives’ in D Davies, D Swinburne and G Williams (2006) (eds) Writing matters: the Royal Literary Fund report on student writing in higher education. London: Royal Literary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjala P (1998). ‘Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: do learning outcomes differ?’ Studies in Higher Education, vol 23, no 2, June, pp 173-189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilce H (2006). ‘They can’t write, spell or present an argument…’ The Independent. 24 May.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate U (2006). ‘Doing away with study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, October 2006, pp 457-469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke M (2001). ‘Formative assessment and its relevance to retention’, Higher Education Research and Development, vol 20, no 2, pp 115-126.
   Google Scholar