Using personality type differences to form engineering design teams

References

• BaranR. B. (2005) Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, burnout, and satisfaction in Illinois dentists. Journal of General Dentistry, May/June, 228–234.
   Google Scholar
• BelbinM. (1981) Management Teams: Why they succeed or fail. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Belbin Team Roles (2007) Belbin Associates Ltd. Cambridge. Available from: http://www.belbin.com/index.htm [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• BroerE. & McCarleyN.G. (1999) Using and validating the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in mainland China. Journal of Psychological Type, 51, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• CAPT (2007) Center for Applications of Psychological Type. Gainesville, Florida. Available from: http://www.capt.org [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-PremuzicT. & FurnhamA. (2003) Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangT. & ChangD. (2000) Graduate engineering student performance assessment: How learning patterns affect test scores. Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, St Louis, MO, 18-22 June.
   Google Scholar
• ClackG. B., AllenJ., CooperD. & HeadJ. O. (2004) Personality differences between doctors and their patients: implications for the teaching of communication skills. Medical Education, 38, (2), 177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPP Inc. (2007). Consulting Psychologists Press. Mountain View, California. Available from: http://www.cpp.com/company/index.asp [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• DymC. L., AgoginoA., ErisO., FreyD. & LeiferL. (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurlingD., (1996) Teaching with “style”: Computer-aided instruction, personality and design education (Doctoral dissertation, Open University, UK) 58 (01).
   Google Scholar
• DurlingD., CrossN., & JohnsonJ. (1996) Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines. In: J. S.Smith (Ed.) Proceedings of IDATER 96 (International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research), 2-4 September, Loughborough University, 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• DurlingD., (2003) Horse or cart? Designer creativity and personality, Presented at the European Academy of Design conference, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• ETB. (2006) Engineering UK. Research Report. December, The Engineering and Technology Board.
   Google Scholar
• FelderR.M., FelderG.N., & DietzE.J. (2002) The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 1, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• FelderR.M. & BrentR. (2005) Understanding student differences, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GruberG. P. (2000) Standardised testing and employment equity career counselling: a literature review of six tests. EECDO Test Review 2000, pp 57.
   Google Scholar
• GuilfordJ.P., (1966) Measurement and creativity, Theory into Practice, 5, (4), 186–189+202.
   Google Scholar
• HardiganP. C., CohenS. R. & JanoffL. E. (2005) A comparison of personality-type among seven health professions: implications of optometric education. Journal of Optometric Education, 30, 2, 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• HofstedeG. (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• HuY. (2005) Chinese students’ learning styles and computer-assisted learning (CAL), Proceedings of the 2nd College of Arts & Social Sciences Postgraduate Conference, University of Aberdeen, 23-23 June.
   Google Scholar
• HwangC. H., & HwangC. E. (1991) Chinese University Students on the MBTI. Garden Grove, CA: InfoMedia, Program D203-CS68.
   Google Scholar
• JensenD.D., MurphyM.D., & WoodK.L. (1998) Evaluation and refinement of a restructured introduction to engineering design course using student surveys and MBTI data, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle WA, 28 June-1 July, Session 2666.
   Google Scholar
• JensenD., WoodK., & WoodJ. (2003) Hands-on Activities, Interactive Multimedia and Improved Team Dynamics for Enhancing Mechanical Engineering Curricula, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19, (6), 874–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JungC. G. (1971) Psychological types. In R. F. C.Hull, The collected works of Carl Gustav Jung Vol. 6. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Original work published in 1921).
   Google Scholar
• KeirseyD. (1998) Please Understand Me II. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• LaymanL., CornwellT., & WilliamsL. (2006) Personality types, learning styles, and an agile approach to software engineering education. 37th ACM Technical Symposium. Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 06), ACM Press. Houston, Texas, USA. 1-5 March.
   Google Scholar
• LesterE., SchofieldD., & ChapmanP. (2006) The interaction of engineering ‘types’: A study of group dynamics and its relationship to self and peer assessment during computer-based exercises. Engineering Education: The Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 1, 1, 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• MathewsD. (2004) British Medical Journals, London. Available from: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/328/7450/1244#60169 [accessed 29 October 2007]
   Google Scholar
• MacdaidG. P., McCaulleyM. H., & KainzR. I. (1986) Atlas of type tables. Centre for Application of Psychological Type, Inc. Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• McKennaA., MongiaL. & AgoginoA. (1998) Capturing student’s teamwork and open-ended design performance in an undergraduate multimedia engineering design class, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference, 4-7 November, 264–269.
   Google Scholar
• McCaulleyM. H. (1990) The MBTI and individual pathways in engineering design, Engineering Education, 80, 537–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiaoD., HuangfuE., ChiaR. C., & RenJ. J. (2000) The validity analysis of the Chinese version MBTI. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 324–331
   Google Scholar
• Myers-Briggs. (2007). The Myers-Briggs Foundation. Available from: http://www.myersbriggs.org/ [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• MyersI. B. & McCauleyM. H. (1985) Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• MyersI.B. & MyersP. B. (1995) Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• MyersI.B., McCaulleyM.H., QuenkN.L., & HammerA.L. (1998) MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: CPP, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• MyersI.B. (1998) Introduction to Type: A guide to understanding your results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’BrienT.P., BernoldL.E. & AkroydD. (1998) Myers-Briggs type indicator and academic achievement in engineering education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 14, (5), 311–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPP (2007) OPP, Oxford. Available from: http://www.opp.co.uk [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• OsterlindS. J., MiaoD., ShengY. & ChiaR.C. (2004) Adapting item format for cultural effects in translated tests: Cultural effects on construct validity of the Chinese versions of the MBTI. International Journal of Testing, 4(1), 61–73
   Google Scholar
• OtisG. D. (2005) Application of psychological type in posttraumatic stress disorder treatment. Journal of Psychological Type, 64, 3, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• PearsonR. E., BellA. J. & CroleyJ. R. (2003) Use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in an undergraduate microelectronics course. Proceedings of the 15th Biennial IEEE University/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium, 30 June-2 July, 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• PittengerD. J. (1993) The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Review of Educational Research, 63, (4), 467–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychtest (2006) M.D. Angus and Associates Ltd. British Columbia. Available from: http://www.psychtest.com/CURR01/CATCONT.HTM [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• RaceP. (2001) The Lecturer’s Toolkit. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• RamsdenP. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• RosatiP. (1998) Academic progress of Canadian engineering students in terms of MBTI personality type. International Journal of Engineering Education, 14, (5), 322–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharpA. (2004) Language learning and awareness of personality type in Chinese settings. 6, (2) Asian EFL Journal, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• ShuckA. A. & PhillipsC. R. (1999) Assessing pharmacy students’ learning styles and personality types: a ten-year analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 63, 27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimH-S. & KimJ-T. (1993) The Development and Validation of the Korean Version of the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type, 26, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Similarminds (2007) Available from: http://similarminds.com/jung.html [accessed 29 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• StephensW. B., (1973) Relationship between selected personality characteristics of senior art students and their area of art study. Studies in Art Education, 14, (3), 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• StoneR. B. & McAdamsD. A. (2000) The touchy-feely side of engineering education: bringing hands-on experiences in the classroom. Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, St Louis, MO, 18-22 June.
   Google Scholar
• WankatP. & OreoviczF. (1993) Teaching Engineering, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, Chapter 13, 245–263.
   Google Scholar
• WildeD. J. (2003) Creative teams, individual development and personality classification. ME310 Course Notes. Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• WildeD.J. (2004) Team Creativity, Proceedings of the NCIIA 8th Annual Meeting — Education that Works, March 18-20, San Jose, NM.
   Google Scholar
• YaoY. (1993) Analyses of the MBTI personality types of Chinese female school administrators in Liaoning province, the People’s Republic of China. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
   Google Scholar
• ZiegertA.L. (2000) The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: further evidence. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, (4), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar