Peer facilitated learning in Mathematics for Engineering: a case study from an Australian university

References

• AlpayE. CutlerP.S. EisenbachS. and FieldA.J. (2010) Changing the marks-based culture of learning through peer-assisted tutorials. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35 (1),17-32.
   Google Scholar
• AmbikairajahE. EppsJ. HeskethT. and ShengM. (2006) Factors affecting engineering student learning and study behaviour. 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 10—13 December 2006, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• BergB.L. (2009) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 7th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• BlancR. A. DeBuhrL and MartinD. C. (1983) Breaking the attrition cycle: the effects of Supplemental Instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 54 (1), 80-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlatC. MyersS. NunnallyK. and TolleyP. (2001) Successfully applying the Supplemental Instruction model to sophomore-level Engineering courses. Available from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=16432 [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• ChengD. and WaltersM. (2009) Peer assisted learning in mathematics: an observational study of student success. The Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 2 (1), 23-40.
   Google Scholar
• CongosD. and StoutB. (2003) The benefits of SI leadership after graduation. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 20 (1), 29-41.
   Google Scholar
• CouchmanJ.A. (2009) An exploration of the lived experience of one cohort of academic peer mentors at a small Australian university. The Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 2 (1), 87-109.
   Google Scholar
• CouchmanJ.A. (2008) Who am I now? Accommodating new higher education diversity in supplemental instruction. The Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 1 (1), 80-90.
   Google Scholar
• EtterE.R. BurmeisterS.L. and ElderR.J. (2001) Improving student performance and retention via Supplemental Instruction. Journal of Accounting Education, 18 (4), 355-368.
   Google Scholar
• FullerM. and JorgensonD. (2004) Mathematics, engineering and education: pathways for the future. 15th Annual AAEE Conference. 27-29 September 2004, Toowoomba, Australia. Available from http://aaee.com.au/conferences/2004.pdf [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• GommR. HammersleyM. and FosterP. (2000) Case study and generalization. In GommR. HammersleyM. and FosterP (Eds). Case study method. London: SAGE Publications, 98-116.
   Google Scholar
• HendersonS and BroadbridgeP. (2007) Mathematics for 21st century engineering students. 2007 AaeE conference, 9-13 December 2007, Melbourne, Australia. Available from http://ww2.cs.mu.oz.au/aaee2007/papers/inv_Hend.pdf [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• HensenK.A and ShelleyM.C (2003) The impact of Supplemental Instruction: results from a large, public, Midwestern university. Journal of College Student Development, 44 (2), 250-259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HurleyM. and GilbertM. (2008) Basic Supplemental Instruction model. In StoneM.E. and JacobsG. (Eds). Supplemental Instruction: improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Monograph no. 7, 3rd edition. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• KieranP. and O’NeillG. (2009) Peer-assisted tutoring in a chemical engineering curriculum: tutee and tutor experiences. The Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 2 (1), 23-40.
   Google Scholar
• KiftS. (2009) Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian Higher Education. Final Report for ALTC Senior Fellowship Programme. Available from http://www.altcexchange.edu.au/book/fellowship-final-report [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• KrauseK. HartleyR. JamesR. and McInnisC. (2005) The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from a decade of national studies. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• KrauseK. and CoatesH. (2008) Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation of Higher Education, 33 (5), 493-505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinJ. and WoolstonD.C. (2008) Important lessons in engineering education learned from seven years of experience in undergraduate academic support programs. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 22-25 October 2008, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MahdiE.M. (2006) Introducing peer-supported learning approach to tutoring in engineering and technology courses. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 43 (4), 277-289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarraR.M and LitzingerT.A. (1997) A model for implementing “Supplemental Instruction” in engineering. Frontiers in Education 1997. 5-8 November 1997, Pittsburgh, USA. Available from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=andarnumber=644793 [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• MartinD and ArendaleD.C. (1994) Supplemental Instruction: increasing achievement and retention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McInnisC. (2001) Researching the first year experience: where to from here? Higher Education Research and Development, 20 (2), 105-114.
   Google Scholar
• MuhrC. and MartinD.C. (2006) Team SI: a resource for integrating and improving learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 106, 85-93.
   Google Scholar
• MurrayM.H. (2006) PASS: primed, persistent, pervasive. 2nd National PASS Day Conference. 10 July 2006. Gold Coast, Australia. Available from http://www.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@stsv/documents/doc/uow021512.pdf [accessed 25 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• O’SheaP. (2006) On using popular culture to enhance learning for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Learning Design, 1 (3), 73-81.
   Google Scholar
• ParkinsonM. (2009) The effect of Peer Assisted Learning Support (PALS) on performance in mathematics and chemistry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46 (4), 381-392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottG. ShahM. GrebennikovL. and SinghH. (2008) Improving student retention: a University of Western Sydney case study. Journal of Institutional Research, 14 (1), 9-23.
   Google Scholar
• StakeR.E. (2000) The case study method in social inquiry. In GommR. HammersleyM. and FosterP. (Eds). Case study method. London: SAGE Publications, 19-26.
   Google Scholar
• TintoV. (2009) Taking student retention seriously: rethinking the first year of university. ALTC FYE Curriculum Design Symposium, 5 February 2009, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• TintoV. (2006) Research and practice of student retention: what next?” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 8, (1) 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• TrotterE. and RobertsC.A. (2006) Enhancing the early student experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 25 (4), 371-386.
   Google Scholar
• van der MeerJ. and ScottC. (2009) Students’ experiences and perceptions of PASS: towards ongoing improvement. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 2 (1), 3-22.
   Google Scholar
• WarrenD. (2002) Curriculum design in a context of widening participation in higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1 (1), 85-99.
   Google Scholar
• WilcoxF.K. and JacobsG. (2008) Thirty-five years of Supplemental Instruction: reflections on study groups and student learning. In StoneM.E. and JacobsG. (Eds) Supplemental Instruction: improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Monograph no. 7, 3rd edition. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, Vii-1.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonK. (2009) Success in first year: the impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first-year student experience, First Year in Higher Education conference, 29 June - 1 July 2009, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• WoodL.N. (2008) Engineering maths - what do students think? ANZIAM Journal, 49, C513-C525.
   Google Scholar
• WrightG.L. WrightR.R. and LambC.E. (2002) Developmental mathematics education and Supplemental Instruction: pondering the potential. Journal of Developmental Education, 26 (1), 30-35.
   Google Scholar
• YinR. K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• ZergerS. (2008) Theoretical frameworks that inform the supplemental instruction model. In StoneM.E. and JacobsG. (eds) Supplemental Instruction: improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Monograph no. 7, 3rd edition. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, Vii-1.
   Google Scholar
• ZhaoC. and KuhG.D. (2004) Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45 (2), 119-138.
   Google Scholar