An Investigation Of Teaching Wholly Online In A School Of Computer And Information Science

References

• Alexander S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43, 240-248.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K., Clayden J., Combes B., Ring J., & Williams T. (2005). Out of the frying pan and into the spa: Developing an online learning community and culture. Pacific Asian Education: A Journal about Education in Pacific Circle Countries, 17(1), 44-53.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Social Research. (2006). The Digital Divide - Barriers to e-learning, : The University of Adelaide Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner M., Brown J., & Canter D. (1985). The research interview uses and approaches (United States of America ed.). Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. (2006). An exploration of student performance, utilisation and attitude to the use of a controlled sequencing Web based learning environment. (PhD thesis). Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell E. (1998). Teaching strategies to foster “deep” versus “surface” learning. 2(3), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Combes B., & Anderson K. (2006). Supporting first year e-learners in courses for the Information professions. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS), 47(4), 259-276.
   Google Scholar
• Costelloe E., Sherry E., & Magee P. (2009). Experiences gained using a set of SCORM compliant reuseable learning objects for teaching programming. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 175-191.
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett J. (2006). The absent centre. EQ Australia, 4(21), 31-32.
   Google Scholar
• Duderstadt J. J., Wulf W. M., & Zemsky R. (2005). Envisioning a transformed university: Change is coming, and the biggest mistake could be underestimating how extensive it will be. Issues in Science and Technology, 22 (1), 35-43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom S. (2006). The role of the instructors as a determinant of students: Satisfaction in university online education. Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Retrieved August 24, 2009 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1156327
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson M., & Ibbetson A. (2005). The use of online technology in the teaching and learning process: WebCT—communication technology or communication turn-off?. Source:International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 1(4), 25-39.
   Google Scholar
• Grover S. (2009). Computer science is not just for big kids.: Compute Science Learning & Leading with Technology Nov 2009, 37(3), 27-30.
   Google Scholar
• Guion L. A. (2006). Conducting an In-depth Interview. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FY393
   Google Scholar
• Gulatee Y. (2010). An Investigation into Online Teaching and the Delivery of Computer Science Topics: Practice, Content and Environmental Factors., Edith Cowan University, Western Australia, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Gulatee Y., Brown J., & Combes B. (2008). Identifying social barriers in teaching Computer Science topics in a wholly online environment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Udon Thani Thailand
   Google Scholar
• Gulatee Y., & Combes B. (2006). Identifying the challenges in teaching computer science topics online. Paper presented at the Engagement and Empowerment Nong Khai, Thailand, 22nd - 24th November.
   Google Scholar
• Gulatee Y., & Combes B. (2007). Technological brriers to successful elearning in computer science. Paper presented at the Transforming Information and Learning Conference, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Gulatee Y., & Combes B. (2008). BIdentifying social barriers in teaching Computer Science topics in a wholly online environment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Udon Thani Thailand
   Google Scholar
• Hara N., & Kling R. (1999). Students’ frustrations with a Web-Based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12).
   Google Scholar
• Hara N., & Kling R. (2000). Students’ distress with a Web-based distance education Course: An Ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Information Communication & Society 3(4), 557-579.
   Google Scholar
• Hentea M., Shea M. J., & Pennington L. (2003). A perspective on fulfilling the expectation of distance education. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Honigsfeld A., & Dunn R. (2006). Learning-style characteristic of adult learners. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 14-17.
   Google Scholar
• Jehng J. C., & Chan T. W. (1998). Designing computer support for collaborative visual learning in the domain of computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(3), 429-448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licea G., Juares R., Martinez L. G., & Aguilar L. (2006). Developing Programming Tools to Reach a Deeper Understanding of Advanced Programming Concepts. ComputerApply Engineer Education, 16, 305-314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey R. K., & Freyberg L. D. (2010). The Effect of social presence on affective and cognitive Learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 99(1), 12.
   Google Scholar
• McSporran M., & King C. (2005). Blended is better: Choosing educational deliverly methods. Paper presented at the In proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, Hypermedia and telecommunications, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mouzakitis S. G. (2009). E-Learning: The six important “Wh…?”. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences. Retrieved 31/03/2010,
   Google Scholar
• Peltier W. J., Schibrowsky A. J., & Drago W. (2007). The Interdependence of the Factors Influencing the Perceived Quality of the Online Learning Experience: A Causal Model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29 140-153.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G. (2002). Etivities: The key to active online learning London: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager M. S., Farooq U., Fusco J., Schank P., & Dwyer N. (2009). Analyzing Online Teacher Networks Cyber Networks Require Cyber Research Tool. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Waschull S. B. (2005). Predicting success in online psychology courses: Self-discipline and motivation Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 190-192.
   Google Scholar
• Werner L. (2009). Pair programming in middle school: what does it look like? Journal of Research on Technology in Education Fall 2009, 42(1), 21-29.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse M. (2005). Using in-depth interviews to evaluate deep learning in students who use online curriculum: a literature review. TILC: Information, Libraries and eLearning, 214-225.
   Google Scholar