Evaluation Of Student Engagement With Peer Feedback Based On Student-Generated MCQs

References

• Bandura A., (1977), Social Learning Theory, New York, General Learning Press
   Google Scholar
• Barak M. & Rafaeli S., (2004), On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(1), 84-103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann A. J., (2008), Web 2.0 comes of age: disintermediation and the long tail in higher education.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering AW. & Gamson Z.F., (1987), Seven Principles For Good Practice In Undergraduate Education, AAHE Bulletin, 3-7.
   Google Scholar
• Collis B. & Moonen J., (2006), Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies, Springer Netherlands, chapter The Contributing Student: Learners as Co-Developers of Learning Resources for Reuse in Web Environments, 49-67
   Google Scholar
• Denny P. and Luxton-Reilly A. & Hamer J., (2008), The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions, in ‘ACE ’08: Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education’, Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 69-74
   Google Scholar
• Denny P. and Luxton-Reilly A. & Simon B., (2009a), Quality of Student Contributed Questions Using PeerWise, in MargaretHamilton & TonyClear, ed., ‘Eleventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2009)’, ACS, Wellington, New Zealand, 45-53
   Google Scholar
• Denny P. and Luxton-Reilly A.; Hamer J. & Purchase H., (2009b), Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository, in ‘ITiCSE ‘09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education’, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11-15
   Google Scholar
• Dourish P. and Belloti V., (1992), Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces, In Proc. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’92).
   Google Scholar
• Fellenz M., (2004), Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(6), 703-719
   Google Scholar
• Hamer J., (2006), Some experiences with the “contributing student approach”, in ‘ITICSE ’06: Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education’, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68-72
   Google Scholar
• Harley D. and Acord S.K. and Earl-Novell S. and Lawrence S., & King C.J., (2010), Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. University of California, Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jucevičienė P. G. V., (2010), A Conceptual Model of Social Networking in Higher Education., Electronics and electrical engineering, ISSN 1392-1215. No.6 (102)
   Google Scholar
• Kawase R. and Herder E. and Nejdl W., (2010), Annotations and Hypertrails with SpreadCrumbs: An Easy Way to Annotate, Refind and Share. In: WEBIST 2010: Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
   Google Scholar
• Kerawalla L. and Minocha S. and Kirkup G. and Conole G., (2009), An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education., Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, pp. 31-42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner P.A. and J.Sweller, and R.E.Clark. (2006), Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist. 41(2), 75-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw S.S and Chen G.D., & Huang H.M., (2008), Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management, Computers and Education, 50, 950-961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minocha S, (2009), An empirically-grounded study on the effective use of social software in education, Education + Training, Vol. 51 Iss: 5/6, 381 - 394
   Google Scholar
• Nicol D., (2007), ‘E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect’, Journal of Further and Higher Education 31(1), 53.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson J.H. and Wilson J.N. & P. Leimich P, (2012), Uses of Peer Assessment in Database Teaching and Learning, in Data Security & Security Data: 27th British National Conference on Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6121, 135-146.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky M., (2001), ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants’, On the Horizon 9(5). Lincoln: NCB University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purchase H. and Hamer J.; Denny P. & Luxton-Reilly A., (2010), The quality of a PeerWise MCQ repository, in ‘Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 103’, Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 137-146
   Google Scholar
• Trentin G, (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project., Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 43-55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L., (1978), Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Wichersham L.E., & McGhee P., (2008), Perceptions of satisfaction and deeper learning in an online course, The Quarterly review of Distance Education, 9(1), 73-83
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E., (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Wu C-P & Yu F-Y., (2009), Changing Students’ Perceived Value and Use of Learning Approaches for Online Student-Generated Questions via an Integrative Model, in ‘Workshop Proceedings of The 17th International Conference on Computers in Education: ICCE 2009’, 30-34
   Google Scholar
• Yu F.-Y., (2009), Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system, Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(5), 1129-1138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar