Knowing our Places? Contexts and Edges in Integrating Disciplines in Built Environment Education

References

• Bentley I., Alcock A., Murrain P., McGlynn S. & Smith G. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• CABE. (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment). (2003). Creating excellent buildings: A guide for clients. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman D. (2006). Applying macro urban morphology to urban design and development planning: Valletta and Floriana. Urban Morphology, 10 (1), 23-40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman D. & Larkham P. J. (1999). Urban design, urban quality and the quality of life: Reviewing the Department of the Environment’s Urban Design Campaign. Journal of Urban Design, 4 (2), 211-232.
   Google Scholar
• Collier A., Bacon J., Burns D. & Muir T. (1991). Interdisciplinary studies in the built environment. London: Council for National Academic Awards.
   Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Board. (1996). Educating the professional team. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Conte E. & Monno V. (2001). Integrating expert and common knowledge for sustainable housing management. In: Maiellaro N. (Ed.). Towards sustainable building. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 11-28.
   Google Scholar
• Conzen M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers, Publication no. 27. London: George Philip.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper I. (1997). Support for inter-disciplinary research. Workshop on Inter-disciplinary Research. Salford: University of Salford, Research and Graduate College, March.
   Google Scholar
• Cortese A. D. (2003). The critical role of Higher Education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31 (3), 15-22.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen G. (1961). Townscape. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen G. (1968). Notation: The observant layman’s code for his environment. London: Architectural Press Broadsheets, Alcan Industries Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert A. R. (2005). A debate from down-under: Spatial political economy and urban design. Urban Design International, 10 (3-4), 223-234.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert A. R. (2007). Urban design: Requiem for an era — review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International, 12 (4), 177-223.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey J. (1974). Selected writings. In: Archambault R. D. (Ed.). John Dewey on education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 149-156.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy F. & Hutton L. (1998). Architectural knowledge: The idea of a profession. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. (1998). Rethinking construction: The report of the Construction Task Force. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions/Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. (2004). Skills for sustainable communities. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Frank A. (2005). A need for fluency across boundaries. CEBE Transactions, 2 (3), 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gann D. & Salter A. (1999). Interdisciplinary skills for built environment professionals. London: The Ove Arup Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hall A. C. (1997). Dealing with incremental change: An application of urban morphology to design control. Journal of Urban Design, 2 (3), 221-239.
   Google Scholar
• Hall A. C. (2000). How morphology can improve development plans. Urban Morphology, 4 (1), 29-32.
   Google Scholar
• Healey P. (1995). Discourse of integration: Making frameworks for democratic urban planning. In: Healey P., Cameron S., Davoudi S., Graham S. & Madani-Pour A. (Eds.). Managing Cities. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 251-272.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles M. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kostoff S. (1992). The city assembled. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Kropf K. S. (1993). An enquiry into the definition of built form in urban morphology. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Kropf K. S. (Ed.) (2001). Stratford-on-Avon district design guide. Stratford on Avon: Stratford-on-Avon District Council.
   Google Scholar
• Latham M. (1994). Constructing the team: Joint review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lees M. (2007). Editorial. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 2 (2), 1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch K. (1962). Site planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer I. S., van Bueren E. M., Bots P. W. G., van der Voort H. & Seijdel R. (2005). Collaborative decision making for sustainable urban renewal projects: A simulation — gaming approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32 (3), 403-423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill I. & Beaty L. (1992). Action learning: A practitioner’s guide. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn S. & Samuels I. (2000). The funnel, the sieve and the template: Towards an operational urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 4 (2), 79-89.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon A. V. (1992). A Catholic approach to what urban designers should know. Journal of Planning Literature, 6 (4), 331-349.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon A. V. (2002). Thinking about micro and macro urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 6 (1), 37-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punter J. V. (2007). Developing urban design as pubic policy: Best practice principles for design review and development management. Journal of Urban Design, 12 (2), 167-202.
   Google Scholar
• Punter J. & Carmona M. (1997). The design dimension of planning. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Schön D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Schön D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tibbalds F. (1988). ‘Mind the Gap!’ A personal view of the value of urban design in the late twentieth century. The Planner, 74 (3), 11-15.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beuren E. M. & Priemus H. (2002). Institutional barriers to sustainable construction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (1), 75-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker A. (2005). Teaching land-scape through story-telling: Learning from the subjective to traverse disciplines. CEBE Transactions, 2 (3), 30-41.
   Google Scholar
• Webster C. (2008). Learning on the boundaries — an invitation to pool boundary-crossing learning objects. CEBE Transactions, 5 (1), 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehand J. W. R. & Morton N. (2003). Fringe belts and the recycling of urban land: An academic concept and planning practice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 30 (6), 819-839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehand J. W. R. & Morton N. (2004). Urban morphology and planning: The case of fringe belts. Cities, 21, 275-289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder N. (2003). Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (= integrative) research. In: Tress G., Tress B., van der Valk A. & Fry G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations. Wageningen: Delta Series 2, pp. 74-90.
   Google Scholar
• Wood G. (1999). Interdisciplinary working in built environment education. Education + Training, 41 (8), 373-380.
   Google Scholar
• Worskett R. (1969). The character of towns: An approach to conservation. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar