Formative Assessment: Balancing Educational Effectiveness and Resource Efficiency

References

• Baume D. (1998). Marking and giving feedback, Practice guide 4. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Black P. (1999). Assessment, learning theories and testing systems. In: Murphy P. (Ed.). Learners, learning and assessment. London: Paul Chapman, pp. 118-134.
   Google Scholar
• Black P. & Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7-74.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D. (1995). Assessment and learning. Contradictory or complementary. In: Knight P. (Ed.). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 35-48.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G. (2001). Assessment: A guide for lecturers. Assessment series No. 3. York: LTSN Generic Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Brown S., Race P. & Rust C. (1995). Using and experiencing assessment. In: Knight P. (Ed.). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 75-85.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher P., Jordan S. & Whitelock D. (undated). Learn about formative e-assessment. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Scottish University Principals (1992). Teaching and learning in an expanding higher education system (The MacFarlane Report). Edinburgh: Committee of Scottish University Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks T. (2001). The validity of formative assessments. Paper presented to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, 13—15 September.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov N. (1995). Improving feedback to and from students. In: Knight P. (Ed.). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 157-166.
   Google Scholar
• George J. & Cowan J. (1999). A handbook of techniques for formative evaluation: Mapping the student’s learning experience. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs G. (1998). Marking and giving feedback. In: Open University Centre for Higher Education Practice. (Ed.). Teaching in higher education: Theory and evidence. Milton Keynes: Open University, pp. 3-37.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs G. & Jenkins A. (Eds.). (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Hadrill R. (1995). The NCVQ model of assessment at higher levels. In: Knight P. (Ed.). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 167-179.
   Google Scholar
• Handley K., Price M. & Millar J. (2008). Engaging students with assessment feedback. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins M., Grant F., Thompson P. & Montarzino A. (2010). Effective and efficient methods of formative assessment. Cardiff: Centre for Education in the Built Environment. URL: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/cebe/Documents/projects/innovativeprojects/Effective_and_Efficient_Methods_of_Formative_Assessment.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Hornby W. (2005). Dogs, stars, Rolls Royces and old double-decker buses: Efficiency and effectiveness in assessment. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.). Reflections on assessment: Volume I. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, pp. 15-28.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison S. (2005). Streamlining assessment: Some options for assessment in class. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.) Reflections on assessment: Volume I. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, pp. 41-48.
   Google Scholar
• Juwah C., Macfarlane-Dick D., Matthew B., Nicol D., Ross D. & Smith B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Knight P. (2002). Being a teacher in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Land R. (2005). Streamlining assessment: Making assessment more efficient and more effective. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.). Reflections on assessment: Volume I. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, pp. 29-40.
   Google Scholar
• Leach L., Neutze G. & Zepke N. (1998). Motivation in assessment. In: Brown S., Armstrong S. & Thompson G. (Eds.). Motivating students. London: Kogan Page, pp. 201-209.
   Google Scholar
• Lines D. & Mason C. (2005). Enhancing practice: Assessment. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Moore I. (1995). Staff and educational development for assessment reform: A case study. In Knight P. (Ed.). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 95-109.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan C. & O’Reilly M. (1999). Assessing open and distance learners. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer J. (1998). Motivating student learning through facilitating independence: Self and peer assessment of reflective practice — an action research project. In: Brown S., Armstrong S. & Thompson G. (Eds.). Motivating students. London: Kogan Page, pp. 173-187.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol D. (2009). Quality enhancement themes: The first year experience. Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol D. & Macfarlane-Dick D. (2005). Rethinking formative assessment in higher education: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.). Reflections on assessment: Volume II. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, pp. 105-119.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol D. & Macfarlane-Dick D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty G. (2004). Teaching today. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2007). Integrative assessment: Managing assessment practices and procedures. Guide no 4. Mansfield: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross D. A. (2005). Streamlining assessment — how to make assessment more efficient and more effective — an overview. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.). Reflections on assessment: Volume I. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, 12-14.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell K., Miller J. & Hodgson S. (2002). Let’s get the assessment to drive the learning. In: Schwartz P. & Webb G. (Eds.). Assessment: Case studies, experience and practice from higher education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 137-143.
   Google Scholar
• Wisdom J. (2006). Developing higher education teachers to teach creatively. In: Jackson N., Oliver M., Shaw M. & Wisdom J. (Eds.). Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge, pp. 183-196.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45 (4), 477-501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke M. (2005). Formative assessment and student success. In: Quality Assurance Agency Scotland (Ed.). Reflections on assessment: Volume II. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency, 125-137.
   Google Scholar
• Zou P.X.W. (2008). Designing effective assessment in postgraduate construction project management studies. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3 (1), 80-94.
   Google Scholar