Futures Thinking in Planning Education and Research

References

• Abbott J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24 (3), 237‱251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam B. & Groves C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts L. (2010). More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 37 (6), 1115‱1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger P. & Tewdwr-Jones M. (Eds.). (2002). Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ammer D. (2009). Globalizing action on climate change. In: Ijioui R., Emmerich H., Ceyp M. & Hagen J. (Eds.). Globalization 2.0: A roadmap to the future from leading minds. New York: Springer, pp. 1‱4.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee T. (2011). Response to ‘commentary: Is urban design still urban planning?’ Whither urban design? Inside or outside planning? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31 (2), 208‱210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty M. (2010). The unpredictability of the near and far future. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (6), 958‱960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman Z. (2006). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes T. M. (2009). Complexity in urban development and management: Historical overview and opportunities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13 (2), 214‱227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck U. (2007). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco H., Alberti M., Forsyth A., Krizek K. J., Rodriguez D. A., Talen E. & Ellis C. (2009a). Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning, 71 (4), 153‱205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco H., Alberti M., Olshansky R., Chang S., Wheeler S. M., Randolph J., London J. B., Hollander J. B., Pallagst K. M., Schwarz T., Popper F. J., Parnell A., Pieterse E. & Watson V. (2009b). Shaken, shrinking, hot, impoverished, and informal: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning, 72 (4), 195‱250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradwell P., Johar I., Maguire C. & Miner P. (2007). Future visions: Propositions for the new age of planning. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks M. P. (2002). Planning theory for practitioners. Chicago: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brail R. K. & Klosterman R. E. (Eds.). (2001). Planning support systems. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budge T. (2009). Educating planners, educating for planning or planning education: The never-ending story. Australian Planner, 46 (1), 8‱13.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S. (2006). Is ‘progress’ no longer progressive? Reclaiming the ideology of progress in planning. URRC Working Paper Series 06-01. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Chan P. & Cooper R. (2010). Constructing futures: Industry leaders and futures thinking in construction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry G. E. (1986). A changing profession in a changing world. Australian Planner, 24 (4), 13‱18.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen K. S. (1985). Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the America Planning Association, 51 (1), 63‱73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole I. (2006). Hidden from history? Housing studies, the perpetual present and the case of social housing in Britain. Housing Studies, 21 (2), 283‱295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole S. (2001). Dare to dream: Bringing futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (4), 372‱383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell D. J. (2009). Planning and its orientation to the future. International Planning Studies, 14 (1), 85‱98.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis H. (2005). ‘Where has the future gone?’ Rethinking the role of integrated land use models. Environment and Planning A, 37 (8), 1353‱1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffara P. (2011). Rethinking tomorrow's cities: Emerging issues on city foresight. Futures, 43 (7), 680‱689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton L. (2001). Thinking about tomorrow: Bringing the future to the forefront of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (4), 397‱401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi S. & Dammers E. (2010). Introduction: The territorial futures of Europe. Futures, 42 (8), 779‱784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi S., Hall P. & Power A. (2008). Key issues for planning futures and the way forward. 21st Century Society, 3 (3), 229‱247.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi S. & Pendlebury J. (2010). The evolution of planning as an academic discipline. Town Planning Review, 81 (6), 613‱645.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo G. (2010). Planning and complexity: An introduction. In: De Roo G. & Silva E. A. (Eds.). A planner's encounter with complexity. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.1‱18.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou H. T. (2007). Strategic planning thought: Lessons from elsewhere. In: Dimitriou H. T. & Thompson R. (Eds.). Strategic planning for regional development in the UK. London: Routledge, pp. 43‱65.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher A., Gaston N. & Martens P. (2008). Measuring globalisation: Gauging its consequences. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foresight Land Use Futures Project. (2010). Executive Summary. London: The Government Office for Science.
   Google Scholar
• Foth M., Bajracharya B., Brown R. A. & Hearn G. N. (2009). The second life of urban planning? Using neogeography tools for community engagement. Journal of Location Based Services, 3 (2), 97‱117.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann J. (2005). Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning, 64, 183‱234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend J. K. & Jessop W. N. (1969). Local government and strategic choice: An operational research approach to the processes of public planning. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner D. (2011). Future Babble: Why expert predictions fail — and why we believe them anyway. Melbourne: Scribe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut R. (2008). The Garnaut climate change review, final report. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman S. & Stillwell J. (Eds.). (2009). Planning support systems: Best practice and new methods. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson B. (1996). No more imperial cities: On futurology in social science. Urban Unit, Working Paper No. 57. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson B. (2010). Lifeboat cities. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant J. (2007). Vision, planning and democracy. In: Hopkins L. D. & Zapata M. (Eds.). Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans and project. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp.39‱58.
   Google Scholar
• Green D. G. & Newth D. (2001). Towards a theory of everything? Grand challenges in complexity and informatics. Complexity International, 8, URL: http://www.complexity.org.au/ci/vol08/green05/green05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haratsis B. (2010). Australia 2050: Big Australia? Vol. 1, Melbourne: Digital Print Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Harty C., Goodier C. I., Soetanto R., Austin S., Dainty A. R. J. & Price A. D. F. (2007). The futures of construction: a critical review of construction future studies. Construction Management and Economics, 25 (5), 477‱493.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. (1985). On planning the ideology of planning. In: Harvey D. The urbanization of capital. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 165‱184.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Healey P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier J. (2010). Introduction. In: Hillier J. & Healey P. (Eds.). The Ashgate research companion to planning theory. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.1‱34.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins L. D. & Zapata M. A. (Eds.). (2007). Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans and project. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Innes J. & Booher D. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isserman A. M. (1985). Dare to plan: An essay on the role of the future in planning practice and education. Town Planning Review, 56 (4), 483‱491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Katz P. (2010). Beyond the priesthood. Planitezen, November (originally published 1995). URL: http://www.planetizen.com/node/45549
   Google Scholar
• Kemp R., Loorbach D. & Rotmans J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of coevolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14 (1), 78‱91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakee A. (1988). Relationship between future studies and planning. European Journal of Operations Research, 33 (2), 200‱211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakee A. (1991). Scenario construction for urban planning. Omega, 19 (5), 459‱469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakee A. & Dahlgren L. (1986). Values in future studies and planning. Futures, 18 (1), 52‱67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley S. (2010). Representing ‘things to come’: Feeling the vision of future technologies. Environment and Planning A, 42 (11), 2771‱2790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman R. (2010). The ethics of metropolitan growth: The future of our built environment. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kwartler M. & Longo G. (2008). Visioning and visualization: People, pixels and plans. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Landis J. D. (1995). Imagining land use futures: Applying the California futures model. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61 (4), 438‱457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkham P. J. & Lilley K. D. (2001). Planning the ‘city of tomorrow’: British reconstruction planning, 1939–1952: An annotated bibliography. Pickering, North Yorkshire: Inch's Books.
   Google Scholar
• Light J. S. (2009). The nature of cities: Ecological visions and the American urban professions, 1920–1960. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach D. & Rotmans J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42 (3), 237‱246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay H. (2007). Advance Australia where! Sydney: Hachette Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mant J. (2011). Australian cities: the things we don't talk about. URL: http://www.theplanningboardroom.net/australian-cities-the-things-we-don%e2%80%99t-talk-about/
   Google Scholar
• Martens P. & Raza M. (2010). Is globalisation sustainable? Sustainability, 2 (1), 280‱293.
   Google Scholar
• May G. H. (1982). The argument for more future-oriented planning. Futures, 14 (4), 313‱318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May G. H. (1996). The future is ours: Foreseeing, managing and creating the future. London: Adamantine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J. & Behrens W. W. III (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mendieta E. (2010). The city to come: Critical urban theory as utopian mapping. City, 14 (4), 442‱447.
   Google Scholar
• Meng L. L. (2009). Megatrends driving planning education: How do we future-proof planning? Australian Planner, 46 (1), 48‱50.
   Google Scholar
• Miller C. (2011). Implementing sustainability: The New Zealand experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myers D. (2001). Symposium: Putting the future in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (4), 365‱367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers D. & Kitsuse A. (2000). Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19 (3), 221‱231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Planning Institute. (2011). NZPI education policy and accreditation procedures. Auckland: NZPI.
   Google Scholar
• Newton P. (2007). Horizon 3 planning: Meshing liveability with sustainability. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (4), 571‱575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Global Science Forum. (2011). Effective modelling of urban systems to address the challenges of climate change and sustainability. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. URL: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/37/49352636.pdf (Accessed January 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy J. A. (2002). Creating better futures: Scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens S. & Cowell R. (2002). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder D. (2010). Necessary dreaming: Uses of utopia in planning. In: Hillier J. & Healey P. (Eds.). The Ashgate research companion to planning theory. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.343‱364.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Accreditation Board. (2006). The accreditation document: Criteria and procedures of the Planning Accreditation Program. Chicago: PAB.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Institute of Australia. (2010). Accreditation policy for the recognition of Australian planning qualifications for the urban and regional planning chapter. Canberra: PIA.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2011). Performance benchmarking of Australian business regulation: Planning, zoning and development assessments. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J. (2008). Developing ordinary cities: City visioning process in Durban and Johannesburg. Environment and Planning A, 40 (1), 74‱87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney C. W. (2010). Intersections of strategic planning and futures studies: Methodological complementarities. Journal of Futures Studies, 15 (2), 71‱100.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute. (2004). Policy statement on initial planning education. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute. (2012). Policy statement on initial planning education: Revised 2012. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21^st century. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Scott A. J. & Roweis S. T. (1977). Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal. Environment and Planning A, 9 (10), 1097‱1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott M. (1969). American city planning since 1890. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shipley R. & Michela J. L. (2006). Can vision motivate planning action? Planning Practice and Research, 21 (2), 223‱244.
   Google Scholar
• Sieverts T. (2003). Cities without cities: An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim S. (2010). The end of modernity: What the financial and environmental crisis is really telling us. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter R. (2008). Beyond ‘the future of' responding to the civilisational challenge. In: Proceedings of ACER Research 2008: Touching the future: building skills for life and work, Melbourne, 2008, pp.14‱18. URL: http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/RC2008ConfProceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Song Y., Ding C. & Knaap G. (2006). Envisioning Beijing 2020 through sketches of urban scenarios. Habitat International, 30 (4), 1018‱1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead D. & Banister D. (2004). Visioning and backcasting: Desirable futures and key decisions. STELLA Focus Group 4 meeting, Brussels 25–27 March 2004. URL: http://www.slideserve.com/kimn/visioning-and-backcasting-desirable-futures-and-key-decisions
   Google Scholar
• Steele W. (2007). Where is the vision? Critically exploring the professional role of the Australian urban planner within a governance framework. State of the Australian Cities Conference, Brisbane, pp.871‱879. URL: http://soac.fbe.unsw.edu.au/2007/SOAC/whereisthevision.pdf (Accessed May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W., Sanderson A., Tyson P. D., Jäger J., Matson P. A., Moore B. III, Oldfield F., Richardson K., Schellnhuber H. J., Turner B. L. II, Wasson R. J. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb N. N. (2010). The blackswan: The impact of the highly improbable. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teitz M. (1978). Summing up the congress. Royal Australian Planning Institute Journal, 17 (1), 137‱139.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas H. (2007). From radicalism to reformism. Planning Theory, 6 (3), 332‱235
   Google Scholar
• Watt N. (2011). David Cameron calls civil servants ‘enemies of enterprise’. The Guardian, 6 March 2011. URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/06/david-cameron-civilservice-enemies
   Google Scholar