Impaired Resection of Meiotic Double-Strand Breaks Channels Repair to Nonhomologous End Joining in Caenorhabditis elegans

REFERENCES

• Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G. 2008. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasior SL, Wong AK, Kora Y, Shinohara A, Bishop DK. 1998. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with rad55 and rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev. 12:2208–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Ogawa T. 1992. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69:457–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung P. 1994. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265:1241–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwacha A, Kleckner N. 1995. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83:783–791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johzuka K, Ogawa H. 1995. Interaction of Mre11 and Rad50: two proteins required for DNA repair and meiosis-specific double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139:1521–1532.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsubouchi H, Ogawa H. 1998. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:260–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young JA, Hyppa RW, Smith GR. 2004. Conserved and nonconserved proteins for meiotic DNA breakage and repair in yeasts. Genetics 167:593–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartsuiker E, Mizuno K, Molnar M, Kohli J, Ohta K, Carr AM. 2009. Ctp1CtIP and Rad32Mre11 nuclease activity are required for Rec12Spo11 removal, but Rec12Spo11 removal is dispensable for other MRN-dependent meiotic functions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:1671–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K. 2004. Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell 16:1968–1978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furuse M, Nagase Y, Tsubouchi H, Murakami-Murofushi K, Shibata T, Ohta K. 1998. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 17:6412–6425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui T, Ohta T, Oshiumi H, Tomizawa J, Ogawa H, Ogawa T. 1998. Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95:705–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. 1999. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:556–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg M, Kohli J, Ludin K. 2009. Ctp1 and the MRN-complex are required for endonucleolytic Rec12 removal with release of a single class of oligonucleotides in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000722. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman N, Higuchi E, Smith GR. 2009. Meiotic DNA double-strand break repair requires two nucleases, MRN and Ctp1, to produce a single size class of Rec12 (Spo11)-oligonucleotide complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:5998–6005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ. 2011. Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479:241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Yao MS, Bender CF, Mills M, Bladl AR, Bradley A, Petrini JH. 1999. Disruption of mRad50 causes embryonic stem cell lethality, abnormal embryonic development, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:7376–7381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Petersen S, Tessarollo L, Nussenzweig A. 2001. Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 11:105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciapponi L, Cenci G, Ducau J, Flores C, Johnson-Schlitz D, Gorski MM, Engels WR, Gatti M. 2004. The Drosophila Mre11/Rad50 complex is required to prevent both telomeric fusion and chromosome breakage. Curr. Biol. 14:1360–1366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorski MM, Romeijn RJ, Eeken JC, de Jong AW, van Veen BL, Szuhai K, Mullenders LH, Ferro W, Pastink A. 2004. Disruption of Drosophila Rad50 causes pupal lethality, the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks and the induction of apoptosis in third instar larvae. DNA Repair 3:603–615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buis J, Wu Y, Deng Y, Leddon J, Westfield G, Eckersdorff M, Sekiguchi JM, Chang S, Ferguson DO. 2008. Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber MR. 2010. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79:181–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich E, Novotny R, Kneidinger B, Holzmann V, Wintersberger U. 2003. Non-homologous end joining as an important mutagenic process in cell cycle-arrested cells. EMBO J. 22:2274–2283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Kuhne M, Jeggo PA, Lobrich M. 2001. Radiation-induced genomic rearrangements formed by nonhomologous end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res. 61:3886–3893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JK, Haber JE. 1996. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2164–2173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington LS, Gautier J. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45:247–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiestl RH, Zhu J, Petes TD. 1994. Effect of mutations in genes affecting homologous recombination on restriction enzyme-mediated and illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4493–4500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manolis KG, Nimmo ER, Hartsuiker E, Carr AM, Jeggo PA, Allshire RC. 2001. Novel functional requirements for non-homologous DNA end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 20:210–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Virgilio M, Gautier J. 2005. Repair of double-strand breaks by nonhomologous end joining in the absence of Mre11. J. Cell Biol. 171:765–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clejan I, Boerckel J, Ahmed S. 2006. Developmental modulation of nonhomologous end joining in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 173:1301–1317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin JS, Winkelmann N, Petalcorin MI, McIlwraith MJ, Boulton SJ. 2005. RAD-51-dependent and -independent roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-related protein during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3127–3139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smolikov S, Eizinger A, Hurlburt A, Rogers E, Villeneuve AM, Colaiacovo MP. 2007. Synapsis-defective mutants reveal a correlation between chromosome conformation and the mode of double-strand break repair during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 176:2027–2033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chin GM, Villeneuve AM. 2001. C. elegans mre-11 is required for meiotic recombination and DNA repair but is dispensable for the meiotic G(2) DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15:522–534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi M, Chin GM, Villeneuve AM. 2007. C. elegans germ cells switch between distinct modes of double-strand break repair during meiotic prophase progression. PLoS Genet. 3:e191. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, Villeneuve AM. 1998. Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94:387–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo C, Bazzicalupo P, Ederle S, Hilliard M, La Volpe A. 2002. Roles for Caenorhabditis elegans rad-51 in meiosis and in resistance to ionizing radiation during development. Genetics 160:471–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penkner A, Portik-Dobos Z, Tang L, Schnabel R, Novatchkova M, Jantsch V, Loidl J. 2007. A conserved function for a Caenorhabditis elegans Com1/Sae2/CtIP protein homolog in meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 26:5071–5082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krogh BO, Llorente B, Lam A, Symington LS. 2005. Mutations in Mre11 phosphoesterase motif I that impair Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex stability in addition to nuclease activity. Genetics 171:1561–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaiacovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, La Volpe A, Villeneuve AM. 2003. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev. Cell 5:463–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQueen AJ, Colaiacovo MP, McDonald K, Villeneuve AM. 2002. Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 16:2428–2442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyer W, Kaitna S, Couteau F, Ward JD, Boulton SJ, Zetka M. 2008. HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis. Dev. Cell 14:263–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L, Halsey C. 1995. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9:1728–1739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly KO, Dernburg AF, Stanfield GM, Villeneuve AM. 2000. Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156:617–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes TM, Kohara Y, Coulson A, Hekimi S. 1995. Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 141:159–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CJ, Mets DG, Albrecht MR, Nix P, Chan A, Meyer BJ. 2008. Meiotic crossover number and distribution are regulated by a dosage compensation protein that resembles a condensin subunit. Genes Dev. 22:194–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yokoo R, Zawadzki KA, Nabeshima K, Drake M, Arur S, Villeneuve AM. 2012. COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149:75–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner A, Milstein S, Ahmed S, Hodgkin J, Hengartner MO. 2000. A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 5:435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicky C, Alpi A, Passannante M, Rose A, Gartner A, Muller F. 2004. Multiple genetic pathways involving the Caenorhabditis elegans Bloom's syndrome genes him-6, rad-51, and top-3 are needed to maintain genome stability in the germ line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5016–5027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langerak P, Mejia-Ramirez E, Limbo O, Russell P. 2011. Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002271. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. 2010. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J. 29:3358–3369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Topper LM, Wilson TE. 2008. Recruitment and dissociation of nonhomologous end joining proteins at a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178:1237–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens BB, Johnson NM, Tijsterman M. 2013. COM-1 promotes homologous recombination during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis by antagonizing Ku-mediated non-homologous end joining. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003276. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimonkar AV, Genschel J, Kinoshita E, Polaczek P, Campbell JL, Wyman C, Modrich P, Kowalczykowski SC. 2011. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev. 25:350–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz S, Amon A, Klein F. 1997. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146:781–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiolo I, Carotenuto W, Maffioletti G, Petrini JH, Foiani M, Liberi G. 2005. Srs2 and Sgs1 DNA helicases associate with Mre11 in different subcomplexes following checkpoint activation and CDK1-mediated Srs2 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5738–5751.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Kwon Y, Zhao W, Chi P, Prakash R, Seong C, Liu D, Lu L, Ira G, Sung P. 2010. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467:108–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou L, Eberhard R, Doukoumetzidis K, Hengartner MO. 2011. NER and HR pathways act sequentially to promote UV-C-induced germ cell apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ. 18:897–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez AG, Mis EK, Bargmann BO, Birnbaum KD, Piano F. 2010. Automated sorting of live C. elegans using laFACS. Nat. Methods 7:417–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar