Dynamic Interaction of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G1 (eIF4G1) with eIF4E and eIF1 Underlies Scanning-Dependent and -Independent Translation

REFERENCES

• Aitken CE, Lorsch JR. 2012. A mechanistic overview of translation initiation in eukaryotes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:568–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch AG. 2014. The scanning mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation. Annu Rev Biochem 83:779–812. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marintchev A, Wagner G. 2004. Translation initiation: structures, mechanisms, and evolution. Q Rev Biophys 37:197–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583505004026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. 2009. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136:731–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, von der Haar T, Singh CR, Ii M, Li B, Hinnebusch AG, McCarthy JE, Asano K. 2003. The yeast eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) HEAT domain interacts with eIF1 and eIF5 and is involved in stringent AUG selection. Mol Cell Biol 23:5431–5445. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.15.5431-5445.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFebvre AK, Korneeva NL, Trutschl M, Cvek U, Duzan RD, Bradley CA, Hershey JW, Rhoads RE. 2006. Translation initiation factor eIF4G-1 binds to eIF3 through the eIF3e subunit. J Biol Chem 281:22917–22932. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M605418200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinvani H, Haimov O, Svitkin Y, Sonenberg N, Tamarkin-Ben-Harush A, Viollet B, Dikstein R. 2015. Translational tolerance of mitochondrial genes to metabolic energy stress involves TISU and eIF1-eIF4GI cooperation in start codon selection. Cell Metab 21:479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa N, Do A, Hershey JW, Fraser CS. 2013. Human eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) protein binds to eIF3c, -d, and -e to promote mRNA recruitment to the ribosome. J Biol Chem 288:32932–32940. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.517011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung Y-N, Maag D, Mitchell SF, Fekete CA, Algire MA, Takacs JE, Shirokikh N, Pestova T, Lorsch JR, Hinnebusch A. 2007. Dissociation of eIF1 from the 40S ribosomal subunit is a key step in start codon selection in vivo. Genes Dev 21:1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1528307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asano K, Sachs MS. 2007. Translation factor control of ribosome conformation during start codon selection. Genes Dev 21:1280–1287. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1562707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzberger JP, Stengel F, Pellarin R, Zhang S, Schaefer T, Aylett CHS, Cimermancic P, Boehringer D, Sali A, Aebersold R, Ban N. 2014. Molecular architecture of the 40S, eIF1, eIF3 translation initiation complex. Cell 158:1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain T, Llácer JL, Fernández IS, Munoz A, Martin-Marcos P, Savva CG, Lorsch JR, Hinnebusch AG, Ramakrishnan V. 2014. Structural changes enable start codon recognition by the eukaryotic translation initiation complex. Cell 159:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llacer JL, Hussain T, Marler L, Aitken CE, Thakur A, Lorsch JR, Hinnebusch AG, Ramakrishnan V. 2015. Conformational differences between open and closed states of the eukaryotic translation initiation complex. Mol Cell 59:399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simonetti A, Querido JB, Myasnikov AG, Mancera-Martinez E, Renaud A, Kuhn L, Hashem Y. 2016. eIF3 peripheral subunits rearrangement after mRNA binding and start-codon recognition. Mol Cell 63:206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obayashi E, Luna RE, Nagata T, Martin-Marcos P, Hiraishi H, Singh CR, Erzberger JP, Zhang F, Arthanari H, Morris J, Pellarin R, Moore CR, Harmon I, Papadopoulos E, Yoshida H, Nasr ML, Unzai S, Thompson B, Aube E, Dagraca E, Ananbandam A, Gao P, Urano T, Hinnebusch AG, Wagner G, Asano K. 2017. Molecular landscape of the ribosome pre-initiation complex during mRNA scanning: structural role for eIF3c and its control by eIF5. Cell Reports 18:2651–2663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar P, Hellen CUT, Pestova TV. 2016. Toward the mechanism of eIF4F-mediated ribosomal attachment to mammalian capped mRNAs. Genes Dev 30:1573–1588. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.282418.116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfakess R, Sinvani H, Haimov O, Svitkin Y, Sonenberg N, Dikstein R. 2011. Unique translation initiation of mRNAs-containing TISU element. Nucleic Acids Res 39:7598–7609. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak M. 2002. Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene 299:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01056-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XQ, Rothnagel JA. 2004. 5′ untranslated regions with multiple upstream AUG codons can support low-level translation via leaky scanning and reinitiation. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1382–1391. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haimov O, Sinvani H, Dikstein R. 2015. Cap-dependent, scanning-free translation initiation mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1849:1313–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.09.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozak M. 1991. A short leader sequence impairs the fidelity of initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Gene Expr 1:111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak M. 1991. Effects of long 5′ leader sequences on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes in vitro. Gene Expr 1:117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedman SA, Gelembiuk GW, Mertz JE. 1990. Translation initiation at a downstream AUG occurs with increased efficiency when the upstream AUG is located very close to the 5′ cap. J Virol 64:453–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elfakess R, Dikstein R. 2008. A translation initiation element specific to mRNAs with very short 5′ UTR that also regulates transcription. PLoS One 3:e3094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimov O, Sinvani H, Martin F, Ulitsky I, Emmanuel R, Tamarkin-Ben-Harush A, Vardy A, Dikstein R. 2017. Efficient and accurate translation initiation directed by TISU involves RPS3 and RPS10e binding and differential eukaryotic initiation factor 1A regulation. Mol Cell Biol 37:e00150-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00150-17.
   Google Scholar
• Gandin V, Masvidal L, Hulea L, Gravel SP, Cargnello M, McLaughlan S, Cai Y, Balanathan P, Morita M, Rajakumar A, Furic L, Pollak M, Porco JA, Jr, St-Pierre J, Pelletier J, Larsson O, Topisirovic I. 2016. nanoCAGE reveals 5′ UTR features that define specific modes of translation of functionally related MTOR-sensitive mRNAs. Genome Res 26:636–648. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.197566.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atger F, Gobet C, Marquis J, Martin E, Wang J, Weger B, Lefebvre G, Descombes P, Naef F, Gachon F. 2015. Circadian and feeding rhythms differentially affect rhythmic mRNA transcription and translation in mouse liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E6579–E6588. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515308112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomakin IB, Kolupaeva VG, Marintchev A, Wagner G, Pestova TV. 2003. Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF1 on the 40S ribosomal subunit determined by directed hydroxyl radical probing. Genes Dev 17:2786–2797. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1141803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestova TV, Kolupaeva VG. 2002. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev 16:2906–2922. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1020902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh CR, Watanabe R, Chowdhury W, Hiraishi H, Murai MJ, Yamamoto Y, Miles D, Ikeda Y, Asano M, Asano K. 2012. Sequential eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) binding to the charged disordered segments of eIF4G and eIF2beta stabilizes the 48S preinitiation complex and promotes its shift to the initiation mode. Mol Cell Biol 32:3978–3989. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00376-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh CR, He H, Ii M, Yamamoto Y, Asano K. 2004. Efficient incorporation of eukaryotic initiation factor 1 into the multifactor complex is critical for formation of functional ribosomal preinitiation complexes in vivo. J Biol Chem 279:31910–31920. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M313940200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano K, Phan L, Anderson J, Hinnebusch AG. 1998. Complex formation by all five homologues of mammalian translation initiation factor 3 subunits from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273:18573–18585. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.29.18573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov IP, Loughran G, Sachs MS, Atkins JF. 2010. Initiation context modulates autoregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 (eIF1). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:18056–18060. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009269107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reibarkh M, Yamamoto Y, Singh CR, del Rio F, Fahmy A, Lee B, Luna RE, Ii M, Wagner G, Asano K. 2008. Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 1 carries two distinct eIF5-binding faces important for multifactor assembly and AUG selection. J Biol Chem 283:1094–1103. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M708155200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moerke NJ, Aktas H, Chen H, Cantel S, Reibarkh MY, Fahmy A, Gross JD, Degterev A, Yuan J, Chorev M, Halperin JA, Wagner G. 2007. Small-molecule inhibition of the interaction between the translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G. Cell 128:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos E, Jenni S, Kabha E, Takrouri KJ, Yi T, Salvi N, Luna RE, Gavathiotis E, Mahalingam P, Arthanari H, Rodriguez-Mias R, Yefidoff-Freedman R, Aktas BH, Chorev M, Halperin JA, Wagner G. 2014. Structure of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E in complex with 4EGI-1 reveals an allosteric mechanism for dissociating eIF4G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E3187–E3195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410250111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmurugan R, Gambhir SS. 2003. Monitoring protein-protein interactions using split synthetic renilla luciferase protein-fragment-assisted complementation. Anal Chem 75:1584–1589. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020731c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruner S, Peter D, Weber R, Wohlbold L, Chung MY, Weichenrieder O, Valkov E, Igreja C, Izaurralde E. 2016. The structures of eIF4E-eIF4G complexes reveal an extended interface to regulate translation initiation. Mol Cell 64:467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano K, Vornlocher H-P, Richter-Cook NJ, Merrick WC, Hinnebusch AG, Hershey JWB. 1997. Structure of cDNAs encoding human eukaryotic initiation factor 3 subunits: possible roles in RNA binding and macromolecular assembly. J Biol Chem 272:27042–27052. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.43.27042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee AS, Kranzusch PJ, Cate JH. 2015. eIF3 targets cell-proliferation messenger RNAs for translational activation or repression. Nature 522:111–1114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Singh CR, Marintchev A, Hall NS, Hannig EM, Wagner G, Asano K. 2005. The eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 HEAT domain mediates multifactor assembly and scanning with distinct interfaces to eIF1, eIF2, eIF3 and eIF4G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16164–16169. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507960102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson O, Morita M, Topisirovic I, Alain T, Blouin MJ, Pollak M, Sonenberg N. 2012. Distinct perturbation of the translatome by the antidiabetic drug metformin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8977–8982. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201689109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamarkin-Ben-Harush A, Vasseur JJ, Debart F, Ulitsky I, Dikstein R. 2017. Cap-proximal nucleotides via differential eIF4E binding and alternative promoter usage mediate translational response to energy stress. Elife 6:e21907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21907.
   Google Scholar
• Erijman A, Dantes A, Bernheim R, Shifman JM, Peleg Y. 2011. Transfer-PCR (TPCR): a highway for DNA cloning and protein engineering. J Struct Biol 175:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.04.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashkenazi S, Plotnikov A, Bahat A, Ben-Zeev E, Warszawski S, Dikstein R. 2016. A novel allosteric mechanism of NF-κB dimerization and DNA binding targeted by an anti-inflammatory drug. Mol Cell Biol 36:1237–1247. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00895-15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar