H2A.Z-Dependent Regulation of Cohesin Dynamics on Chromosome Arms

REFERENCES

• Hirano T. 2006. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:311–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray JM, Carr AM. 2008. Smc5/6: a link between DNA repair and unidirectional replication? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:177–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2005. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:595–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aono N, Sutani T, Tomonaga T, Mochida S, Yanagida M. 2002. Cnd2 has dual roles in mitotic condensation and interphase. Nature 417:197–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/417197a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkenbihl RP, Subramani S. 1992. Cloning and characterization of rad21 an essential gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in DNA double-strand-break repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:6605–6611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAleenan A, Clemente-Blanco A, Cordon-Preciado V, Sen N, Esteras M, Jarmuz A, Aragon L. 2013. Post-replicative repair involves separase-dependent removal of the kleisin subunit of cohesin. Nature 493:250–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagao K, Adachi Y, Yanagida M. 2004. Separase-mediated cleavage of cohesin at interphase is required for DNA repair. Nature 430:1044–1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, Leleu M, Sauer S, Gregson HC, Jarmuz A, Canzonetta C, Webster Z, Nesterova T, Cobb BS, Yokomori K, Dillon N, Aragon L, Fisher AG, Merkenschlager M. 2008. Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell 132:422–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, Schirghuber E, Tsutsumi S, Nagae G, Ishihara K, Mishiro T, Yahata K, Imamoto F, Aburatani H, Nakao M, Imamoto N, Maeshima K, Shirahige K, Peters JM. 2008. Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 451:796–801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2009. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43:525–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudra S, Skibbens RV. 2013. Cohesin codes: interpreting chromatin architecture and the many facets of cohesin function. J. Cell Sci. 126:31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.116566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. 2005. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol. 3(3):e69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann F, Lottspeich F, Nasmyth K. 1999. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400:37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/21831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palecek J, Vidot S, Feng M, Doherty AJ, Lehmann AR. 2006. The SMC5-6 DNA repair complex: bridging of the SMC5-6 heads by the Kleisin, NSE4, and non-Kleisin subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 281:36952–36959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608004200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroos HB, Strom L, Itoh T, Katou Y, Shirahige K, Sjogren C. 2006. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol. Cell 22:755–767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR, Watts FZ. 2005. Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:185–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.1.185-196.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia-Alveal C, O'Connell MJ. 2011. Nse1-dependent recruitment of Smc5/6 to lesion-containing loci contributes to the repair defects of mutant complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 22:4669–4682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JM, Gao J, Wang J, Yang M, Potts PR. 2010. MAGE-RING protein complexes comprise a family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 39:963–974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann AR, Walicka M, Grittiths DJF, Murray JM, Watts FZ, McCready S, Carr AM. 1995. The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:7067–7080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps J, Nasim A, Miller DR. 1985. Recovery, repair, and mutagenesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Adv. Genet. 23:1–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkenbihl RP, Subramani S. 1995. The rad21 gene product of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a nuclear, cell cycle-regulated phosphoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 270:7703–7711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey SH, Sheedy DM, Cuddihy AR, O'Connell MJ. 2004. Coordination of DNA damage responses via the Smc5/Smc6 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:662–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.2.662-674.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkade HM, Bugg SJ, Lindsay HD, Carr AM, O'Connell MJ. 1999. Rad18 is required for DNA repair and checkpoint responses in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:2905–2918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.9.2905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outwin EA, Irmisch A, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2009. Smc5-Smc6-dependent removal of cohesin from mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:4363–4375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00377-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia-Alveal C, Outwin EA, Trempolec N, Dziadkowiec D, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2010. SMC complexes and topoisomerase II work together so that sister chromatids can work apart. Cell Cycle 9:2065–2070. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.11.11734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copsey A, Tang S, Jordan PW, Blitzblau HG, Newcombe S, Chan AC, Newnham L, Li Z, Gray S, Herbert AD, Arumugam P, Hochwagen A, Hunter N, Hoffmann E. 2013. Smc5/6 coordinates formation and resolution of joint molecules with chromosome morphology to ensure meiotic divisions. PLoS Genet. 9(12):e1004071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pebernard S, Perry JJ, Tainer JA, Boddy MN. 2008. Nse1 RING-like domain supports functions of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex in genome stability. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:4099–4109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194:795–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass KL, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2012. Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress. J. Cell Sci. 125:2753–2764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.103119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calonge TM, Eshaghi M, Liu J, Ronai Z, O'Connell MJ. 2010. Transformation/transcription domain-associated protein (TRRAP)-mediated regulation of Wee1. Genetics 185:81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.114769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonge TM, O'Connell MJ. 2006. Antagonism of Chk1 signaling in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint by dominant alleles of Cdr1. Genetics 174:113–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.060970.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keogh MC, Kim JA, Downey M, Fillingham J, Chowdhury D, Harrison JC, Onishi M, Datta N, Galicia S, Emili A, Lieberman J, Shen X, Buratowski S, Haber JE, Durocher D, Greenblatt JF, Krogan NJ. 2006. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates γH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439:497–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita K, Cooper JP. 2008. Fission yeast Ccq1 is telomerase recruiter and local checkpoint controller. Genes Dev. 22:3461–3474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.498608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iben JR, Epstein JA, Bayfield MA, Bruinsma MW, Hasson S, Bacikova D, Ahmad D, Rockwell D, Kittler EL, Zapp ML, Maraia RJ. 2011. Comparative whole genome sequencing reveals phenotypic tRNA gene duplication in spontaneous Schizosaccharomyces pombe La mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:4728–4742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood V, Harris MA, McDowall MD, Rutherford K, Vaughan BW, Staines DM, Aslett M, Lock A, Bahler J, Kersey PJ, Oliver SG. 2012. PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D695–D699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-e-r25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr AM, Dorrington SM, Hindley J, Phear GA, Aves SJ, Nurse P. 1994. Analysis of a histone H2A variant from fission yeast: evidence for a role in chromosome stability. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:628–635.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zlatanova J, Thakar A. 2008. H2A.Z: view from the top. Structure 16:166–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2007.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Vanoosthuyse V, Fillingham J, Roguev A, Watt S, Kislinger T, Treyer A, Carpenter LR, Bennett CS, Emili A, Greenblatt JF, Hardwick KG, Krogan NJ, Bahler J, Keogh MC. 2009. An acetylated form of histone H2A.Z regulates chromosome architecture in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:1286–1293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hou H, Wang Y, Kallgren SP, Thompson J, Yates JRIII, Jia S. 2010. Histone variant H2A.Z regulates centromere silencing and chromosome segregation in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 285:1909–1918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.058487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krogan NJ, Keogh MC, Datta N, Sawa C, Ryan OW, Ding H, Haw RA, Pootoolal J, Tong A, Canadien V, Richards DP, Wu X, Emili A, Hughes TR, Buratowski S, Greenblatt JF. 2003. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell 12:1565–1576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00497-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zofall M, Fischer T, Zhang K, Zhou M, Cui B, Veenstra TD, Grewal SI. 2009. Histone H2A.Z cooperates with RNAi and heterochromatin factors to suppress antisense RNAs. Nature 461:419–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papamichos-Chronakis M, Watanabe S, Rando OJ, Peterson CL. 2011. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 144:200–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Gasser SM. 2007. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 26:4113–4125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. 2004. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777–788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan CJ, Aligianni S, Durand-Dubief M, Persson J, Will WR, Webster J, Wheeler L, Mathews CK, Elderkin S, Oxley D, Ekwall K, Varga-Weisz PD. 2010. Fission yeast Iec1-ino80-mediated nucleosome eviction regulates nucleotide and phosphate metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:657–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01117-09.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe S, Radman-Livaja M, Rando OJ, Peterson CL. 2013. A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme. Science 340:195–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1229758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs JA. 2008. Histone H3 K56 acetylation, chromatin assembly, and the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7:2020–2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xhemalce B, Miller KM, Driscoll R, Masumoto H, Jackson SP, Kouzarides T, Verreault A, Arcangioli B. 2007. Regulation of histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 282:15040–15047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M701197200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haldar D, Kamakaka RT. 2008. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hst4 functions in DNA damage response by regulating histone H3 K56 acetylation. Eukaryot. Cell 7:800–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00379-07.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor EM, Copsey AC, Hudson JJ, Vidot S, Lehmann AR. 2008. Identification of the proteins, including MAGEG1, that make up the human SMC5-6 protein complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:1197–1206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00767-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, Schaffer L, Campbell D, Head SR, Boddy MN. 2008. Localization of Smc5/6 to centromeres and telomeres requires heterochromatin and SUMO, respectively. EMBO J. 27:3011–3023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maundrell K. 1993. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123:127–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gachet Y, Tournier S, Millar JB, Hyams JS. 2004. Mechanism controlling perpendicular alignment of the spindle to the axis of cell division in fission yeast. EMBO J. 23:1289–1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gomez EB, Nugent RL, Laria S, Forsburg SL. 2008. Schizosaccharomyces pombe histone acetyltransferase MstI (KAT5) is an essential protein required for damage response and chromosome segregation. Genetics 179:757–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.085779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nugent RL, Johnsson A, Fleharty B, Gogol M, Xue-Franzen Y, Seidel C, Wright AP, Forsburg SL. 2010. Expression profiling of S. pombe acetyltransferase mutants identifies redundant pathways of gene regulation. BMC Genomics 11:59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarcinella E, Zuzarte PC, Lau PN, Draker R, Cheung P. 2007. Monoubiquitylation of H2A.Z distinguishes its association with euchromatin or facultative heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6457–6468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00241-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangasamy D, Greaves I, Tremethick DJ. 2004. RNA interference demonstrates a novel role for H2A.Z in chromosome segregation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:650–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Stukenberg PT, Kelm O, Redemann N, Nigg EA, Peters JM. 2002. The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. Mol. Cell 9:515–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00473-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM. 2000. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 103:399–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00132-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada K, Susumu H, Sakuno T, Watanabe Y. 2011. Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature 474:477–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma U, Stefanova D, Holmes SG. 2013. Histone variant H2A.Z functions in sister chromatid cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33:3473–3481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00162-12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guacci V. 2007. Sister chromatid cohesion: the cohesin cleavage model does not ring true. Genes Cells 12:693–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01093.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay S, Mehta M, Kuo D, Sung MK, Chuang R, Jaehnig EJ, Bodenmiller B, Licon K, Copeland W, Shales M, Fiedler D, Dutkowski J, Guenole A, van Attikum H, Shokat KM, Kolodner RD, Huh WK, Aebersold R, Keogh MC, Krogan NJ, Ideker T. 2010. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330:1385–1389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1195618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwall K. 2007. Epigenetic control of centromere behavior. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41:63–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardabasso C, Hasson D, Ratnakumar K, Chung CY, Duarte LF, Bernstein E. 2013. Histone variants: emerging players in cancer biology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71:379–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1343-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suto RK, Clarkson MJ, Tremethick DJ, Luger K. 2000. Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:1121–1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/81971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar