Drosophila Transcription Factor Tramtrack69 Binds MEP1 To Recruit the Chromatin Remodeler NuRD

REFERENCES

• Badenhorst, P. 2001. Tramtrack controls glial number and identity in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. Development 128:4093–4101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajpe, P. K., J. A. van der Knaap, J. A. Demmers, K. Bezstarosti, A. Bassett, H. M. van Beusekom, A. A. Travers, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2008. Deubiquitylating enzyme UBP64 controls cell fate through stabilization of the transcriptional repressor Tramtrack. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:1606–1615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baonza, A., C. M. Murawsky, A. A. Travers, and M. Freeman. 2002. Pointed and Tramtrack69 establish an EGFR-dependent transcriptional switch to regulate mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:976–980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouazoune, K., and A. Brehm. 2006. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes in Drosophila. Chromosome Res. 14:433–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, J. L., S. Sonoda, H. Ueda, M. P. Scott, and C. Wu. 1991. Repression of the Drosophila fushi tarazu (ftz) segmentation gene. EMBO J. 10:665–674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalkley, G. E., Y. M. Moshkin, K. Langenberg, K. Bezstarosti, A. Blastyak, H. Gyurkovics, J. A. Demmers, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2008. The transcriptional coactivator SAYP is a trithorax group signature subunit of the PBAP chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:2920–2929.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalkley, G. E., and C. P. Verrijzer. 2004. Immuno-depletion and purification strategies to study chromatin-remodeling factors in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 377:421–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clapier, C. R., and B. R. Cairns. 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:273–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denslow, S. A., and P. A. Wade. 2007. The human Mi-2/NuRD complex and gene regulation. Oncogene 26:5433–5438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzl, G., D. Chen, F. Schnorrer, K. C. Su, Y. Barinova, M. Fellner, B. Gasser, K. Kinsey, S. Oppel, S. Scheiblauer, A. Couto, V. Marra, K. Keleman, and B. J. Dickson. 2007. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, N., D. L. Jaye, C. Geigerman, A. Akyildiz, M. R. Mooney, J. M. Boss, and P. A. Wade. 2004. MTA3 and the Mi-2/NuRD complex regulate cell fate during B lymphocyte differentiation. Cell 119:75–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giesen, K., T. Hummel, A. Sollewerk, S. Harrison, A. Travers, and C. Klambt. 1997. Glial development in the Drosophila CNS requires concomitant activation of glial and repression of neuronal differentiation genes. Development 124:2307–2316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, M., E. Bier, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1995. tramtrack acts downstream of numb to specify distinct daughter cell fates during asymmetric cell divisions in the Drosophila PNS. Neuron 14:913–925.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison, S. D., and A. A. Travers. 1990. The tramtrack gene encodes a Drosophila finger protein that interacts with the ftz transcriptional regulatory region and shows a novel embryonic expression pattern. EMBO J. 9:207–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kal, A. J., T. Mahmoudi, N. B. Zak, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2000. The Drosophila brahma complex is an essential coactivator for the trithorax group protein zeste. Genes Dev. 14:1058–1071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kehle, J., D. Beuchle, S. Treuheit, B. Christen, J. A. Kennison, M. Bienz, and J. Muller. 1998. dMi-2, a hunchback-interacting protein that functions in polycomb repression. Science 282:1897–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert, N., E. Wagner, M. Murawska, H. Klinker, E. Kremmer, and A. Brehm. 2009. dMec: a novel Mi-2 chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 28:533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Z. C., and Y. Li. 1999. Tramtrack69 is positively and autonomously required for Drosophila photoreceptor development. Genetics 152:299–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Guezennec, X., M. Vermeulen, A. B. Brinkman, W. A. Hoeijmakers, A. Cohen, E. Lasonder, and H. G. Stunnenberg. 2006. MBD2/NuRD and MBD3/NuRD, two distinct complexes with different biochemical and functional properties. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehembre, F., P. Badenhorst, S. Muller, A. Travers, F. Schweisguth, and A. Dejean. 2000. Covalent modification of the transcriptional repressor tramtrack by the ubiquitin-related protein Smt3 in Drosophila flies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1072–1082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, S., Y. Li, R. W. Carthew, and Z. C. Lai. 1997. Photoreceptor cell differentiation requires regulated proteolysis of the transcriptional repressor Tramtrack. Cell 90:469–478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohd-Sarip, A., J. A. van der Knaap, C. Wyman, R. Kanaar, P. Schedl, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2006. Architecture of a polycomb nucleoprotein complex. Mol. Cell 24:91–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohrmann, L., K. Langenberg, J. Krijgsveld, A. J. Kal, A. J. Heck, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2004. Differential targeting of two distinct SWI/SNF-related Drosophila chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:3077–3088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohrmann, L., and C. P. Verrijzer. 2005. Composition and functional specificity of SWI2/SNF2 class chromatin remodeling complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1681:59–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moshkin, Y. M., T. W. Kan, H. Goodfellow, K. Bezstarosti, R. K. Maeda, M. Pilyugin, F. Karch, S. J. Bray, J. A. Demmers, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2009. Histone chaperones ASF1 and NAP1 differentially modulate removal of active histone marks by LID-RPD3 complexes during NOTCH silencing. Mol. Cell 35:782–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshkin, Y. M., L. Mohrmann, W. F. van Ijcken, and C. P. Verrijzer. 2007. Functional differentiation of SWI/SNF remodelers in transcription and cell cycle control. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:651–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murawsky, C. M., A. Brehm, P. Badenhorst, N. Lowe, P. B. Becker, and A. A. Travers. 2001. Tramtrack69 interacts with the dMi-2 subunit of the Drosophila NuRD chromatin remodelling complex. EMBO Rep. 2:1089–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D., and J. L. Manley. 1992. Alternatively spliced transcripts of the Drosophila tramtrack gene encode zinc finger proteins with distinct DNA binding specificities. EMBO J. 11:1035–1044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stielow, B., A. Sapetschnig, I. Kruger, N. Kunert, A. Brehm, M. Boutros, and G. Suske. 2008. Identification of SUMO-dependent chromatin-associated transcriptional repression components by a genome-wide RNAi screen. Mol. Cell 29:742–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A. H., T. P. Neufeld, E. Kwan, and G. M. Rubin. 1997. PHYL acts to down-regulate TTK88, a transcriptional repressor of neuronal cell fates, by a SINA-dependent mechanism. Cell 90:459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, R., J. McBride, T. Tsuji, R. B. Donoff, M. Nagai, M. Y. Chou, T. Chiang, and D. T. Wong. 1995. Deleted in oral cancer-1 (doc-1), a novel oral tumor suppressor gene. FASEB J. 9:1362–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unhavaithaya, Y., T. H. Shin, N. Miliaras, J. Lee, T. Oyama, and C. C. Mello. 2002. MEP-1 and a homolog of the NURD complex component Mi-2 act together to maintain germline-soma distinctions in C. elegans. Cell 111:991–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Putte, T., M. Maruhashi, A. Francis, L. Nelles, H. Kondoh, D. Huylebroeck, and Y. Higashi. 2003. Mice lacking ZFHX1B, the gene that codes for Smad-interacting protein-1, reveal a role for multiple neural crest cell defects in the etiology of Hirschsprung disease-mental retardation syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72:465–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Grunsven, L. A., V. Taelman, C. Michiels, K. Opdecamp, D. Huylebroeck, and E. J. Bellefroid. 2006. deltaEF1 and SIP1 are differentially expressed and have overlapping activities during Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 235:1491–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstappen, G., L. A. van Grunsven, C. Michiels, T. Van de Putte, J. Souopgui, J. Van Damme, E. Bellefroid, J. Vandekerckhove, and D. Huylebroeck. 2008. Atypical Mowat-Wilson patient confirms the importance of the novel association between ZFHX1B/SIP1 and NuRD corepressor complex. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17:1175–1183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, Z., C. Zang, K. Cui, D. E. Shones, A. Barski, W. Peng, and K. Zao. 2009. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 138:1019–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y., D. Nguyen, Y. Li, and Z. C. Lai. 2000. The N-terminal BTB/POZ domain and C-terminal sequences are essential for Tramtrack69 to specify cell fate in the developing Drosophila eye. Genetics 156:195–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiong, W. C., and C. Montell. 1993. tramtrack is a transcriptional repressor required for cell fate determination in the Drosophila eye. Genes Dev. 7:1085–1096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, C., R. C. Kauffmann, J. Zhang, S. Kladny, and C. W. Carthew. 2000. Overlapping activators and repressors delimit transcriptional response to receptor tyrosine kinase signals in the Drosophila eye. Cell 103:87–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamasaki, Y., and Y. Nishida. 2006. Mi-2 chromatin remodeling factor functions in sensory organ development through proneural gene repression in Drosophila. Dev. Growth Differ. 48:411–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaret, K. S., J. Watts, J. Xu, E. Wandzioch, S. T. Smale, and T. Sekiya. 2008. Pioneer factors, genetic competence, and inductive signaling: programming liver and pancreas progenitors from the endoderm. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant Biol. 73:119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar