Brc1 Promotes the Focal Accumulation and SUMO Ligase Activity of Smc5-Smc6 during Replication Stress

REFERENCES

• Reubens MC, Rozenzhak S, Russell P. 2017. Multi-BRCT domain protein Brc1 links Rhp18/Rad18 and gammaH2A to maintain genome stability during S phase. Mol Cell Biol 37:e00260-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00260-17.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JS, Williams RS, Dovey CL, Guenther G, Tainer JA, Russell P. 2010. gammaH2A binds Brc1 to maintain genome integrity during S-phase. EMBO J 29:1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy DM, Dimitrova D, Rankin JK, Bass KL, Lee KM, Tapia-Alveal C, Harvey SH, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2005. Brc1-mediated DNA repair and damage tolerance. Genetics 171:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.044966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkade HM, Bugg SJ, Lindsay HD, Carr AM, O'Connell MJ. 1999. Rad18 is required for DNA repair and checkpoint responses in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10:2905–2918. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.9.2905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann F. 2016. SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:399–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copsey A, Tang S, Jordan PW, Blitzblau HG, Newcombe S, Chan AC, Newnham L, Li Z, Gray S, Herbert AD, Arumugam P, Hochwagen A, Hunter N, Hoffmann E. 2013. Smc5/6 coordinates formation and resolution of joint molecules with chromosome morphology to ensure meiotic divisions. PLoS Genet 9:e1004071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004071.
   Google Scholar
• Verver DE, Hwang GH, Jordan PW, Hamer G. 2016. Resolving complex chromosome structures during meiosis: versatile deployment of Smc5/6. Chromosoma 125:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-015-0518-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrkamp-Richter S, Hyppa RW, Prudden J, Smith GR, Boddy MN. 2012. Meiotic DNA joint molecule resolution depends on Nse5-Nse6 of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex. Nucleic Acids Res 40:9633–9646. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xaver M, Huang L, Chen D, Klein F. 2013. Smc5/6-Mms21 prevents and eliminates inappropriate recombination intermediates in meiosis. PLoS Genet 9:e1004067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004067.
   Google Scholar
• Ampatzidou E, Irmisch A, O'Connell MJ, Murray JM. 2006. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26:9387–9401. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01335-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermúdez-López M, Ceschia A, de Piccoli G, Colomina N, Pasero P, Aragón L, Torres-Rosell J. 2010. The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res 38:6502–6512. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irmisch A, Ampatzidou E, Mizuno K, O'Connell MJ, Murray JM. 2009. Smc5/6 maintains stalled replication forks in a recombination-competent conformation. EMBO J 28:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyabe I, Morishita T, Hishida T, Yonei S, Shinagawa H. 2006. Rhp51-dependent recombination intermediates that do not generate checkpoint signal are accumulated in Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad60 and smc5/6 mutants after release from replication arrest. Mol Cell Biol 26:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.1.343-353.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K, Szakal B, Chen YH, Branzei D, Zhao X. 2010. The Smc5/6 complex and Esc2 influence multiple replication-associated recombination processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 21:2306–2314. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e10-01-0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, Seki M, Enomoto T, Ohta K, Foiani M. 2006. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127:509–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, Schaffer L, Campbell D, Head SR, Boddy MN. 2008. Localization of Smc5/6 to centromeres and telomeres requires heterochromatin and SUMO, respectively. EMBO J 27:3011–3023. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR, Watts FZ. 2005. Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.1.185-196.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Blobel G. 2005. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4777–4782. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500537102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outwin EA, Irmisch A, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2009. Smc5-Smc6-dependent removal of cohesin from mitotic chromosomes. Mol Cell Biol 29:4363–4375. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00377-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousteri MI, Lehmann AR. 2000. A novel SMC protein complex in Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains the Rad18 DNA repair protein. EMBO J 19:1691–1702. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.7.1691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabrady K, Adamus M, Vondrova L, Liao C, Skoupilova H, Novakova M, Jurcisinova L, Alt A, Oliver AW, Lehmann AR, Palecek JJ. 2016. Chromatin association of the SMC5/6 complex is dependent on binding of its NSE3 subunit to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 44:1064–1079. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt A, Dang HQ, Wells OS, Polo LM, Smith MA, McGregor GA, Welte T, Lehmann AR, Pearl LH, Murray JM, Oliver AW. 2017. Specialized interfaces of Smc5/6 control hinge stability and DNA association. Nat Commun 8:14011. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morikawa H, Morishita T, Kawane S, Iwasaki H, Carr AM, Shinagawa H. 2004. Rad62 protein functionally and physically associates with the smc5/smc6 protein complex and is required for chromosome integrity and recombination repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24:9401–9413. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9401-9413.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palecek J, Vidot S, Feng M, Doherty AJ, Lehmann AR. 2006. The Smc5-Smc6 DNA repair complex bridging of the Smc5-Smc6 heads by the KLEISIN, Nse4, and non-Kleisin subunits. J Biol Chem 281:36952–36959. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608004200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, Wohlschlegel J, McDonald WH, Yates JR III, Boddy MN. 2006. The Nse5-Nse6 dimer mediates DNA repair roles of the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Mol Cell Biol 26:1617–1630. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.5.1617-1630.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Rozenzhak S, Russell P. 2013. GammaH2A-binding protein Brc1 affects centromere function in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 33:1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01654-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, McDonald WH, Pavlova Y, Yates JR III, Boddy MN. 2004. Nse1, Nse2, and a novel subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, Nse3, play a crucial role in meiosis. Mol Biol Cell 15:4866–4876. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-05-0436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KM, Nizza S, Hayes T, Bass KL, Irmisch A, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2007. Brc1-mediated rescue of Smc5/6 deficiency: requirement for multiple nucleases and a novel Rad18 function. Genetics 175:1585–1595. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.067801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frampton J, Irmisch A, Green CM, Neiss A, Trickey M, Ulrich HD, Furuya K, Watts FZ, Carr AM, Lehmann AR. 2006. Postreplication repair and PCNA modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 17:2976–2985. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, Perry JJ, Tainer JA, Boddy MN. 2008. Nse1 RING-like domain supports functions of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex in genome stability. Mol Biol Cell 19:4099–4109. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia-Alveal C, O'Connell MJ. 2011. Nse1-dependent recruitment of Smc5/6 to lesion-containing loci contributes to the repair defects of mutant complexes. Mol Biol Cell 22:4669–4682. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilio N, Codlin S, Vashisht AA, Bitton DA, Head SR, Wohlschlegel JA, Bahler J, Boddy MN. 2014. A novel histone deacetylase complex in the control of transcription and genome stability. Mol Cell Biol 34:3500–3514. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00519-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang L, Zhao X. 2016. The Rtt107 BRCT scaffold and its partner modification enzymes collaborate to promote replication. Nucleus 7:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2016.1201624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GP, Brown JA, Glover JN, Kobor MS. 2016. Rtt107 BRCT domains act as a targeting module in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair 37:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan B, Hang LE, Zhao X. 2016. Multi-BRCT scaffolds use distinct strategies to support genome maintenance. Cell Cycle 15:2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2016.1218102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu K, Li F, Wang J, Huang H, Wu J, Shi Y. 2012. Structure of C-terminal tandem BRCT repeats of Rtt107 protein reveals critical role in interaction with phosphorylated histone H2A during DNA damage repair. J Biol Chem 287:9137–9146. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.311860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Shao Z, Li F, Niu L, Shi Y, Teng M, Li X. 2011. Structural basis of gammaH2AX recognition by human PTIP BRCT5-BRCT6 domains in the DNA damage response pathway. FEBS Lett 585:3874–3879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohouo PY, Bastos de Oliveira FM, Almeida BS, Smolka MB. 2010. DNA damage signaling recruits the Rtt107-Slx4 scaffolds via Dpb11 to mediate replication stress response. Mol Cell 39:300–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray Chaudhuri A, Callen E, Ding X, Gogola E, Duarte AA, Lee JE, Wong N, Lafarga V, Calvo JA, Panzarino NJ, John S, Day A, Crespo AV, Shen B, Starnes LM, de Ruiter JR, Daniel JA, Konstantinopoulos PA, Cortez D, Cantor SB, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Ge K, Jonkers J, Rottenberg S, Sharan SK, Nussenzweig A. 2016. Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells. Nature 535:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez A, Roguev A, Krogan NJ, Russell P. 2015. Genetic interaction landscape reveals critical requirements for Schizosaccharomyces pombe Brc1 in DNA damage response mutants. G3 5:953–962. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.017251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GP, Lee L, Schmidt TI, Shirahige K, Kobor MS. 2011. Rtt107 is required for recruitment of the SMC5/6 complex to DNA double strand breaks. J Biol Chem 286:26250–26257. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.235200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Ren JY, Zhang JM, Suo F, Fang XF, Wu F, Du LL. 2013. A proteome-wide visual screen identifies fission yeast proteins localizing to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 12:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raschle M, Smeenk G, Hansen RK, Temu T, Oka Y, Hein MY, Nagaraj N, Long DT, Walter JC, Hofmann K, Storchova Z, Cox J, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N, Mann M. 2015. DNA repair proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 348:1253671. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DJ, van der Weyden L, Gergely FV, Arends MJ, Ng BL, Tannahill D, Kanaar R, Markus A, Morris BJ, Bradley A. 2005. BRCTx is a novel, highly conserved RAD18-interacting protein. Mol Cell Biol 25:779–788. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.2.779-788.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Chen H, Kim H, Huen MS, Chen J, Huang J. 2012. RAD18-BRCTx interaction is required for efficient repair of UV-induced DNA damage. DNA Repair 11:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno T, Berta DG, Sjogren C. 2015. The Smc5/6 complex is an ATP-dependent intermolecular DNA linker. Cell Rep 12:1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varejao N, Ibars E, Lascorz J, Colomina N, Torres-Rosell J, Reverter D. 2018. DNA activates the Nse2/Mms21 SUMO E3 ligase in the Smc5/6 complex. EMBO J 37:e98306. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201798306.
   Google Scholar
• Bustard DE, Ball LG, Cobb JA. 2016. Non-Smc element 5 (Nse5) of the Smc5/6 complex interacts with SUMO pathway components. Biol Open 5:777–785. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.018440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJ, Tainer JA, McGowan CH, Boddy MN. 2007. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 26:4089–4101. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du LL, Nakamura TM, Russell P. 2006. Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 20:1583–1596. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1422606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie M, Moser BA, Nakamura TM, Boddy MN. 2017. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase activity can either suppress or promote genome instability, depending on the nature of the DNA lesion. PLoS Genet 13:e1006776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudden J, Perry JJ, Nie M, Vashisht AA, Arvai AS, Hitomi C, Guenther G, Wohlschlegel JA, Tainer JA, Boddy MN. 2011. DNA repair and global sumoylation are regulated by distinct Ubc9 noncovalent complexes. Mol Cell Biol 31:2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.05188-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung I, Leonhardt H, Rippe K. 2011. De novo assembly of a PML nuclear subcompartment occurs through multiple pathways and induces telomere elongation. J Cell Sci 124:3603–3618. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.084681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 194:795–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K. 2006. Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat Protoc 1:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi M, Katou Y, Itoh T, Tazumi A, Tazumi M, Yamada Y, Takahashi T, Nakagawa T, Shirahige K, Masukata H. 2007. Genome-wide localization of pre-RC sites and identification of replication origins in fission yeast. EMBO J 26:1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maundrell K. 1993. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123:127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90551-D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar