Function of the MYND Domain and C-Terminal Region in Regulating the Subcellular Localization and Catalytic Activity of the SMYD Family Lysine Methyltransferase Set5

REFERENCES

• Herz HM, Garruss A, Shilatifard A. 2013. SET for life: biochemical activities and biological functions of SET domain-containing proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 38:621–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2013.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson SM, Gozani O. 2016. Nonhistone lysine methylation in the regulation of cancer pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 6:a026435. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calpena E, Palau F, Espinós C, Galindo MI. 2015. Evolutionary history of the Smyd gene family in metazoans: a framework to identify the orthologs of human Smyd genes in Drosophila and other animal species. PLoS One 10:e0134106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134106.
   Google Scholar
• Spellmon N, Holcomb J, Trescott L, Sirinupong N, Yang Z. 2015. Structure and function of SET and MYND domain-containing proteins. Int J Mol Sci 16:1406–1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16011406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du SJ, Tan X, Zhang J. 2014. SMYD proteins: key regulators in skeletal and cardiac muscle development and function. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 297:1650–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22972.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy C, Warren JS, Szulik M, Wang L, Garcia J, Makaju A, Russell K, Miller M, Franklin S. 2018. The Smyd family of methyltransferases: role in cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology and pathology. Curr Opin Physiol 1:140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2017.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Li J, Li BJ, Yagil E, Zhang J, Du SJ. 2014. Expression and functional characterization of Smyd1a in myofibril organization of skeletal muscles. PLoS One 9:e86808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086808.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamura S, Yoshigai E, Kuhara S, Tashiro K. 2008. Smyd1 and Smyd2 are expressed in muscle tissue in Xenopus laevis. Cytotechnology 57:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-008-9128-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhong Y, Wang Z, Gao J, Xu J, Chu W, Zhang J, Fang S, Du SJ. 2013. Smyd1b is required for skeletal and cardiac muscle function in zebrafish. Mol Biol Cell 24:3511–3521. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-06-0352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan X, Rotllant J, Li H, De Deyne P, DeDeyne P, Du SJ. 2006. SmyD1, a histone methyltransferase, is required for myofibril organization and muscle contraction in zebrafish embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2713–2718. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509503103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb PD, Pierce SA, Sims RJ, Yamagishi H, Weihe EK, Harriss JV, Maika SD, Kuziel WA, King HL, Olson EN, Nakagawa O, Srivastava D. 2002. Bop encodes a muscle-restricted protein containing MYND and SET domains and is essential for cardiac differentiation and morphogenesis. Nat Genet 31:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just S, Meder B, Berger IM, Etard C, Trano N, Patzel E, Hassel D, Marquart S, Dahme T, Vogel B, Fishman MC, Katus HA, Strähle U, Rottbauer W. 2011. The myosin-interacting protein SMYD1 is essential for sarcomere organization. J Cell Sci 124:3127–3136. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.084772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prill K, Windsor Reid P, Wohlgemuth SL, Pilgrim DB. 2015. Still heart encodes a structural HMT, SMYD1b, with chaperone-like function during fast muscle sarcomere assembly. PLoS One 10:e0142528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142528.
   Google Scholar
• Nagandla H, Lopez S, Yu W, Rasmussen TL, Tucker HO, Schwartz RJ, Stewart MD. 2016. Defective myogenesis in the absence of the muscle-specific lysine methyltransferase SMYD1. Dev Biol 410:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TL, Ma Y, Park CY, Harriss J, Pierce SA, Dekker JD, Valenzuela N, Srivastava D, Schwartz RJ, Stewart MD, Tucker HO. 2015. Smyd1 facilitates heart development by antagonizing oxidative and ER stress responses. PLoS One 10:e0121765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121765.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin S, Kimball T, Rasmussen TL, Rosa-Garrido M, Chen H, Tran T, Miller MR, Gray R, Jiang S, Ren S, Wang Y, Tucker HO, Vondriska TM. 2016. The chromatin-binding protein Smyd1 restricts adult mammalian heart growth. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 311:H1234–H1247. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00235.2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GT, Tromp G, Kuivaniemi H, Gretarsdottir S, Baas AF, Giusti B, Strauss E, Van’t Hof FNG, Webb TR, Erdman R, Ritchie MD, Elmore JR, Verma A, Pendergrass S, Kullo IJ, Ye Z, Peissig PL, Gottesman O, Verma SS, Malinowski J, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Borthwick KM, et al.. 2017. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for abdominal aortic aneurysm identifies four new disease-specific risk loci. Circ Res 120:341–353. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlin LT, Andresen C, Just S, Rudensky E, Pappas CT, Kruger M, Jacobs EY, Unger A, Zieseniss A, Dobenecker MW, Voelkel T, Chait BT, Gregorio CC, Rottbauer W, Tarakhovsky A, Linke WA. 2012. Smyd2 controls cytoplasmic lysine methylation of Hsp90 and myofilament organization. Genes Dev 26:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.177758.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proserpio V, Fittipaldi R, Ryall JG, Sartorelli V, Caretti G. 2013. The methyltransferase SMYD3 mediates the recruitment of transcriptional cofactors at the myostatin and c-Met genes and regulates skeletal muscle atrophy. Genes Dev 27:1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.217240.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur PK, Reynoird N, Khatri P, Jansen PW, Wilkinson AW, Liu S, Barbash O, Van Aller GS, Huddleston M, Dhanak D, Tummino PJ, Kruger RG, Garcia BA, Butte AJ, Vermeulen M, Sage J, Gozani O. 2014. SMYD3 links lysine methylation of MAP3K2 to Ras-driven cancer. Nature 510:283–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynoird N, Mazur PK, Stellfeld T, Flores NM, Lofgren SM, Carlson SM, Brambilla E, Hainaut P, Kaznowska EB, Arrowsmith CH, Khatri P, Stresemann C, Gozani O, Sage J. 2016. Coordination of stress signals by the lysine methyltransferase SMYD2 promotes pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev 30:772–785. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.275529.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagislar S, Sabò A, Kress TR, Doni M, Nicoli P, Campaner S, Amati B. 2016. Smyd2 is a Myc-regulated gene critical for MLL-AF9 induced leukemogenesis. Oncotarget 7:66398–66415. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveira-Santos W, Rabello DA, Lucena-Araujo AR, de Oliveira FM, Rego EM, Pittella Silva F, Saldanha-Araujo F. 2016. Residual expression of SMYD2 and SMYD3 is associated with the acquisition of complex karyotype in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Tumour Biol 37:9473–9481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4846-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Farha M, Lanouette S, Elisma F, Tremblay V, Butson J, Figeys D, Couture JF. 2011. Proteomic analyses of the SMYD family interactomes identify HSP90 as a novel target for SMYD2. J Mol Cell Biol 3:301–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjr025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed H, Duan S, Arrowsmith CH, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Schapira M. 2016. An integrative proteomic approach identifies novel cellular SMYD2 substrates. J Proteome Res 15:2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JB, Cao XJ, Han B, Chen LH, Horvath A, Richardson TI, Campbell RM, Garcia BA, Nguyen H. 2016. Quantitative profiling of the activity of protein lysine methyltransferase Smyd2 using SILAC-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 15:892–905. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M115.053280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Perez-Burgos L, Placek BJ, Sengupta R, Richter M, Dorsey JA, Kubicek S, Opravil S, Jenuwein T, Berger SL. 2006. Repression of p53 activity by Smyd2-mediated methylation. Nature 444:629–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddic LA, West LE, Aslanian A, Yates JR, Rubin SM, Gozani O, Sage J. 2010. Methylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by SMYD2. J Biol Chem 285:37733–37740. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.137612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aller GS, Reynoird N, Barbash O, Huddleston M, Liu S, Zmoos AF, McDevitt P, Sinnamon R, Le B, Mas G, Annan R, Sage J, Garcia BA, Tummino PJ, Gozani O, Kruger RG. 2012. Smyd3 regulates cancer cell phenotypes and catalyzes histone H4 lysine 5 methylation. Epigenetics 7:340–343. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.19506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender JD, Pascual G, Liu W, Kaikkonen MU, Do K, Spann NJ, Boutros M, Perrimon N, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK. 2012. Control of proinflammatory gene programs by regulated trimethylation and demethylation of histone H4K20. Mol Cell 48:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamoto R, Furukawa Y, Morita M, Iimura Y, Silva FP, Li M, Yagyu R, Nakamura Y. 2004. SMYD3 encodes a histone methyltransferase involved in the proliferation of cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 6:731–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarris ME, Moulos P, Haroniti A, Giakountis A, Talianidis I. 2016. Smyd3 is a transcriptional potentiator of multiple cancer-promoting genes and required for liver and colon cancer development. Cancer Cell 29:354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansieau S, Leutz A. 2002. The conserved Mynd domain of BS69 binds cellular and oncoviral proteins through a common PXLXP motif. J Biol Chem 277:4906–4910. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110078200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Farha M, Lambert JP, Al-Madhoun AS, Elisma F, Skerjanc IS, Figeys D. 2008. The tale of two domains: proteomics and genomics analysis of SMYD2, a new histone methyltransferase. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:560–572. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700271-MCP200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims RJ, Weihe EK, Zhu L, O’Malley S, Harriss JV, Gottlieb PD. 2002. m-Bop, a repressor protein essential for cardiogenesis, interacts with skNAC, a heart- and muscle-specific transcription factor. J Biol Chem 277:26524–26529. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M204121200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirinupong N, Brunzelle J, Ye J, Pirzada A, Nico L, Yang Z. 2010. Crystal structure of cardiac-specific histone methyltransferase SmyD1 reveals unusual active site architecture. J Biol Chem 285:40635–40644. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.168187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Wu J, Sun B, Zhong C, Ding J. 2011. Structural and biochemical studies of human lysine methyltransferase Smyd3 reveal the important functional roles of its post-SET and TPR domains and the regulation of its activity by DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res 39:4438–4449. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirinupong N, Brunzelle J, Doko E, Yang Z. 2011. Structural insights into the autoinhibition and posttranslational activation of histone methyltransferase SmyD3. J Mol Biol 406:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva FP, Hamamoto R, Kunizaki M, Tsuge M, Nakamura Y, Furukawa Y. 2008. Enhanced methyltransferase activity of SMYD3 by the cleavage of its N-terminal region in human cancer cells. Oncogene 27:2686–2692. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Zhong C, Zhang T, Ding J. 2011. Structure of human lysine methyltransferase Smyd2 reveals insights into the substrate divergence in Smyd proteins. J Mol Cell Biol 3:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjr015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Foreman K, Harriss J, Das C, Zhu L, Edwards M, Shaaban S, Tucker H. 2015. C-terminal domain of SMYD3 serves as a unique HSP90-regulated motif in oncogenesis. Oncotarget 6:4005–4019. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green EM, Mas G, Young NL, Garcia BA, Gozani O. 2012. Methylation of H4 lysines 5, 8, and 12 by yeast Set5 calibrates chromatin stress responses. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:361–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín GM, King DA, Green EM, Garcia-Nieto PE, Alexander R, Collins SR, Krogan NJ, Gozani OP, Morrison AJ. 2014. Set5 and Set1 cooperate to repress gene expression at telomeres and retrotransposons. Epigenetics 9:513–522. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.27645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jezek M, Gast A, Choi G, Kulkarni R, Quijote J, Graham-Yooll A, Park D, Green EM. 2017. The histone methyltransferases Set5 and Set1 have overlapping functions in gene silencing and telomere maintenance. Epigenetics 12:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2016.1265712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang MM, Zhao XQ, Cheng C, Bai FW. 2015. Improved growth and ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid by overexpression of SET5 and PPR1. Biotechnol J 10:1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamour J, Wan C, Zhang M, Zhao X, Den Haan R. 2019. Overexpression of endogenous stress-tolerance related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved strain robustness and production of heterologous cellobiohydrolase. FEMS Yeast Res 19:foz035. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green EM, Morrison AJ, Gozani O. 2012. New marks on the block: Set5 methylates H4 lysines 5, 8, and 12. Nucleus 3:335–339. https://doi.org/10.4161/nucl.20695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stothard P. 2000. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 28:1102, 1104–1104. https://doi.org/10.2144/00286ir01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. 2008. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700468-MCP200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt LJ, Tuch BB, Villén J, Johnson AD, Gygi SP, Morgan DO. 2009. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325:1682–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L, Guo A, Rush J, Fields S, Krogan NJ, Villén J. 2013. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat Methods 10:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY, Coon JJ, Syka JE, Bai DL, Shabanowitz J, Burke DJ, Troyanskaya OG, Hunt DF. 2007. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:2193–2198. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607084104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Wanka S, Kraft C, Urban J, Campbell D, Pedrioli PG, Gerrits B, Picotti P, Lam H, Vitek O, Brusniak MY, Roschitzki B, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Schlapbach R, Colman-Lerner A, Nolan GP, Nesvizhskii AI, Peter M, Loewith R, von Mering C, Aebersold R. 2010. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci Signal 3:rs4. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Elia AE, Naylor ML, Dephoure N, Ballif BA, Goel G, Xu Q, Ng A, Chou DM, Xavier RJ, Gygi SP, Elledge SJ. 2016. Profiling DNA damage-induced phosphorylation in budding yeast reveals diverse signaling networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E3667–E3675. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602827113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DL, Hart-Smith G, Wilkins MR. 2018. Characterization of protein methyltransferases Rkm1, Rkm4, Efm4, Efm7, Set5 and Hmt1 reveals extensive post-translational modification. J Mol Biol 430:102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G, Zhu H, Zhu X, Fasolo J, Guo H, Jona G, Breitkreutz A, Sopko R, McCartney RR, Schmidt MC, Rachidi N, Lee SJ, Mah AS, Meng L, Stark MJ, Stern DF, De Virgilio C, Tyers M, Andrews B, Gerstein M, Schweitzer B, Predki PF, Snyder M. 2005. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 438:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang C, Stillman B. 1997. Persistent initiation of DNA replication and chromatin-bound MCM proteins during the cell cycle in cdc6 mutants. Genes Dev 11:3375–3386. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.24.3375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan S, Harwood J, Drury LS, Diffley JF. 1997. Cdc6p-dependent loading of Mcm proteins onto pre-replicative chromatin in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:5611–5616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.11.5611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes da Rosa J, Holik J, Green EM, Rando OJ, Kaufman PD. 2011. Overlapping regulation of CenH3 localization and histone H3 turnover by CAF-1 and HIR proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 187:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.123117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowary PT, Widom J. 1998. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 276:19–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran K, Jethmalani Y, Jaiswal D, Green EM. 2018. Set4 is a chromatin-associated protein, promotes survival during oxidative stress, and regulates stress response genes in yeast. J Biol Chem 293:14429–14443. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.003078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bua DJ, Kuo AJ, Cheung P, Liu CL, Migliori V, Espejo A, Casadio F, Bassi C, Amati B, Bedford MT, Guccione E, Gozani O. 2009. Epigenome microarray platform for proteome-wide dissection of chromatin-signaling networks. PLoS One 4:e6789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert JP, Mitchell L, Rudner A, Baetz K, Figeys D. 2009. A novel proteomics approach for the discovery of chromatin-associated protein networks. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:870–882. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M800447-MCP200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR, III. 2001. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 73:5683–5690. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010617e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He L, Diedrich J, Chu YY, Yates JR, III. 2015. Extracting accurate precursor information for tandem mass spectra by RawConverter. Anal Chem 87:11361–11367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. 2003. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J Proteome Res 2:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr025556v.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Park SK, Venable JD, Wohlschlegel JA, Diedrich JK, Cociorva D, Lu B, Liao L, Hewel J, Han X, Wong CC, Fonslow B, Delahunty C, Gao Y, Shah H, Yates JR, III. 2015. ProLuCID: an improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. J Proteomics 129:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR, III. 2002. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 1:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr015504q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. 2006. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 24:1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar