BRG1 Governs Nanog Transcription in Early Mouse Embryos and Embryonic Stem Cells via Antagonism of Histone H3 Lysine 9/14 Acetylation

REFERENCES

• Cockburn K, Rossant J. 2010. Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse. J Clin Invest 120:995–1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI41229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Knott JG. 2014. Epigenetic control of cell fate in mouse blastocysts: the role of covalent histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. Mol Reprod Dev 81:171–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oron E., Ivanova N. 2012. Cell fate regulation in early mammalian development. Phys Biol 9:045002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/9/4/045002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K, Beck F, Rossant J. 2005. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 132:2093–2102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Maruyama M, Maeda M, Yamanaka S. 2003. The Homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113:631–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00393-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich JE, Hiiragi T. 2007. Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. Development 134:4219–4231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.003798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi I, Carey TS, Wilson CA, Knott JG. 2012. Transcription factor AP-2gamma is a core regulator of tight junction biogenesis and cavity formation during mouse early embryogenesis. Development 139:4623–4632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.086645.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuckenberg P, Buhl S, Woynecki T, van Furden B, Tolkunova E, Seiffe F, Moser M, Tomilin A, Winterhager E, Schorle H. 2010. The transcription factor TCFAP2C/AP-2gamma cooperates with CDX2 to maintain trophectoderm formation. Mol Cell Biol 30:3310–3320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01215-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home P, Ray S, Dutta D, Bronshteyn I, Larson M, Paul S. 2009. GATA3 is selectively expressed in the trophectoderm of peri-implantation embryo and directly regulates Cdx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem 284:28729–28737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.016840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicklow E, Blij S, Frum T, Hirate Y, Lang RA, Sasaki H, Ralston A. 2014. HIPPO pathway members restrict SOX2 to the inner cell mass where it promotes ICM fates in the mouse blastocyst. PLoS Genet 10: e1004618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004618.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Carey TS, Ganguly A, Wilson CA, Paul S, Knott JG. 2015. Transcription factor AP-2gamma induces early Cdx2 expression and represses HIPPO signaling to specify the trophectoderm lineage. Development 142:1606–1615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.120238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishioka N, Inoue K, Adachi K, Kiyonari H, Ota M, Ralston A, Yabuta N, Hirahara S, Stephenson RO, Ogonuki N, Makita R, Kurihara H, Morin-Kensicki EM, Nojima H, Rossant J, Nakao K, Niwa H, Sasaki H. 2009. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cell 16:398–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Strumpf D, Takahashi K, Yagi R, Rossant J. 2005. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123:917–929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan P, Han J, Guo G, Orlov YL, Huss M, Loh YH, Yaw LP, Robson P, Lim B, Ng HH. 2009. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev 23:2507–2520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1831909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Sengupta S, Magnani L, Wilson CA, Henry RW, Knott JG. 2010. Brg1 is required for Cdx2-mediated repression of Oct4 expression in mouse blastocysts. PLoS One 5: e10622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010622.
   Google Scholar
• Saha B, Home P, Ray S, Larson M, Paul A, Rajendran G, Behr B, Paul S. 2013. EED and KDM6B coordinate the first mammalian cell lineage commitment to ensure embryo implantation. Mol Cell Biol 33:2691–2705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00069-13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito S, D'Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC, Zhang Y. 2010. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466:1129–1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Padilla ME, Parfitt DE, Kouzarides T, Zernicka-Goetz M. 2007. Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature 445:214–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder BL, Palmer S, Knott JG. 2009. SWI/SNF-Brg1 regulates self-renewal and occupies core pluripotency-related genes in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 27:317–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2008-0710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho L, Jothi R, Ronan JL, Cui K, Zhao K, Crabtree GR. 2009. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:5187–5191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812888106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi I, Carey TS, Wilson CA, Knott JG. 2013. Evidence that transcription factor AP-2gamma is not required for Oct4 repression in mouse blastocysts. PLoS One 8: e65771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065771.
   Google Scholar
• Carey TS, Choi I, Wilson CA, Floer M, Knott JG. 2014. Transcriptional reprogramming and chromatin remodeling accompanies Oct4 and Nanog silencing in mouse trophoblast lineage. Stem Cells Dev 23:219–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/scd.2013.0328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho L, Ronan JL, Wu J, Staahl BT, Chen L, Kuo A, Lessard J, Nesvizhskii AI, Ranish J, Crabtree GR. 2009. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:5181–5186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812889106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM. 2005. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 307:1098–1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1106148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gévry N, Svotelis A, Larochelle M, Gaudreau L. 2009. Nucleosome mapping. Methods Mol Biol 543:281–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1_19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Infante JJ, Law GL, Young ET. 2012. Analysis of nucleosome positioning using a nucleosome-scanning assay. Methods Mol Biol 833:63–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bultman S, Gebuhr T, Yee D, La Mantia C, Nicholson J, Gilliam A, Randazzo F, Metzger D, Chambon P, Crabtree G, Magnuson T. 2000. A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Mol Cell 6:1287–1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00127-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolkunova E, Cavaleri F, Eckardt S, Reinbold R, Christenson LK, Scholer HR, Tomilin A. 2006. The caudal-related protein cdx2 promotes trophoblast differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24:139–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2005-0240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch CM, Andrews RM, Flicek P, Dillon SC, Karaoz U, Clelland GK, Wilcox S, Beare DM, Fowler JC, Couttet P, James KD, Lefebvre GC, Bruce AW, Dovey OM, Ellis PD, Dhami P, Langford CF, Weng Z, Birney E, Carter NP, Vetrie D, Dunham I. 2007. The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines. Genome Res 17:691–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.5704207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Zhao K. 2005. Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. Genes Dev 19:542–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1272505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmodiya K, Krebs AR, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Kimura H, Tora L. 2012. H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation co-occur at many gene regulatory elements, while H3K14ac marks a subset of inactive inducible promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 13:424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder BL, Palmer S. 2012. HDAC1 regulates pluripotency and lineage specific transcriptional networks in embryonic and trophoblast stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 40:2925–2939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther MG, Levine SS, Boyer LA, Jaenisch R, Young RA. 2007. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130:77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Serna IL, Ohkawa Y, Imbalzano AN. 2006. Chromatin remodelling in mammalian differentiation: lessons from ATP-dependent remodellers. Nat Rev Genet 7:461–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotter KW, Archer TK. 2008. The BRG1 transcriptional coregulator. Nucl Recept Signal 6: e004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1621/nrs.06004.
   Google Scholar
• Ware CB, Wang L, Mecham BH, Shen L, Nelson AM, Bar M, Lamba DA, Dauphin DS, Buckingham B, Askari B, Lim R, Tewari M, Gartler SM, Issa JP, Pavlidis P, Duan Z, Blau CA. 2009. Histone deacetylase inhibition elicits an evolutionarily conserved self-renewal program in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 4:359–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Morozov AV. 2010. Gene regulation by nucleosome positioning. Trends Genet 26:476–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss TC, Hager GL. 2014. Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors. Nat Rev Genet 15:69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, Smith A. 2003. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113:643–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00392-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng RK, Dean W, Dawson C, Lucifero D, Madeja Z, Reik W, Hemberger M. 2008. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat Cell Biol 10:1280–1290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop L, Stojkovic M, Armstrong L, Walter T, Stojkovic P, Przyborski S, Herbert M, Murdoch A, Strachan T, Lako M. 2005. Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages. Stem Cells 23:1035–1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2005-0080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yabuuchi A, Eminli S, Takeuchi A, Lu CW, Hochedlinger K, Daley GQ. 2009. Cross-regulation of the Nanog and Cdx2 promoters. Cell Res 19:1052–1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2009.79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho LT, Wamaitha SE, Tsai IJ, Artus J, Sherwood RI, Pedersen RA, Hadjantonakis AK, Niakan KK. 2012. Conversion from mouse embryonic to extra-embryonic endoderm stem cells reveals distinct differentiation capacities of pluripotent stem cell states. Development 139:2866–2877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.078519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschhorn JN, Brown SA, Clark CD, Winston F. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev 6:2288–2298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.12a.2288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston F, Carlson M. 1992. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet 8:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Chambers KJ, Faller DV, Wang S. 2007. Reprogramming of the SWI/SNF complex for co-activation or co-repression in prohibitin-mediated estrogen receptor regulation. Oncogene 26:7153–7157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Meng X, Cai Y, Koury MJ, Brandt SJ. 2006. Recruitment of the SWI/SNF protein Brg1 by a multiprotein complex effects transcriptional repression in murine erythroid progenitors. Biochem J 399:297–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20060873.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu W, Cho H, Kadam S, Banayo EM, Anderson S, Yates JR 3rd, Emerson BM, Evans RM. 2004. A methylation-mediator complex in hormone signaling. Genes Dev 18:144–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1141704.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darr H, Mayshar Y, Benvenisty N. 2006. Overexpression of NANOG in human ES cells enables feeder-free growth while inducing primitive ectoderm features. Development 133:1193–1201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.02286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li B, Li W, Ma L, Zheng D, Li L, Yang W, Chu M, Chen W, Mailman RB, Zhu J, Fan G, Archer TK, Wang Y. 2014. Transcriptional repression by the BRG1-SWI/SNF complex affects the pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 3:460–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.07.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Zang C, Cui K, Schones DE, Barski A, Peng W, Zhao K. 2009. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 138:1019–1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar