The LSD1 Family of Histone Demethylases and the Pumilio Posttranscriptional Repressor Function in a Complex Regulatory Feedback Loop

REFERENCES

• Chi P, Allis CD, Wang GG. 2010. Covalent histone modifications—miswritten, misinterpreted and mis-erased in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 10:457–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen MT, Helin K. 2010. Histone demethylases in development and disease. Trends Cell Biol 20:662–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. 2011. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21:381–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Lan F, Matson C, Mulligan P, Whetstine JR, Cole PA, Casero RA. 2004. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119:941–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger E, Wissmann M, Yin N, Muller JM, Schneider R, Peters AH, Gunther T, Buettner R, Schule R. 2005. LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature 437:436–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang R, Barbera AJ, Xu Y, Rutenberg M, Leonor T, Bi Q, Lan F, Mei P, Yuan GC, Lian C, Peng J, Cheng D, Sui G, Kaiser UB, Shi Y, Shi YG. 2010. Human LSD2/KDM1b/AOF1 regulates gene transcription by modulating intragenic H3K4me2 methylation. Mol Cell 39:222–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Essen D, Zhu Y, Saccani S. 2010. A feed-forward circuit controlling inducible NF-κB target gene activation by promoter histone demethylation. Mol Cell 39:750–760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amente S, Lania L, Majello B. 2013. The histone LSD1 demethylase in stemness and cancer transcription programs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829:981–986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano L, Ji JY, Moon NS, Herr A, Dyson N. 2007. Mutation of Drosophila Lsd1 disrupts H3-K4 methylation, resulting in tissue-specific defects during development. Curr Biol 17:808–812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliazer S, Shalaby NA, Buszczak M. 2011. Loss of lysine-specific demethylase 1 nonautonomously causes stem cell tumors in the Drosophila ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7064–7069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015874108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MC, Spradling AC. 2014. The progenitor state is maintained by lysine-specific demethylase 1-mediated epigenetic plasticity during Drosophila follicle cell development. Genes Dev 28:2739–2749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.252692.114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whyte WA, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, Hoke HA, Frampton GM, Foster CT, Cowley SM, Young RA. 2012. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nature 482:221–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo A, Sese B, Boue S, Castano J, Paramonov I, Barrero MJ, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2011. LSD1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 13:652–659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerenyi MA, Shao Z, Hsu YJ, Guo G, Luc S, O'Brien K, Fujiwara Y, Peng C, Nguyen M, Orkin SH. 2013. Histone demethylase Lsd1 represses hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell signatures during blood cell maturation. eLife 2:e00633. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone DN, Su H, Hevi S, Gay F, Lei H, Bajko J, Xu G, Li E, Chen T. 2009. KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature 461:415–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaoka-Taguchi M, Yamada M, Nakamura A, Hanyu K, Kobayashi S. 1999. Maternal Pumilio acts together with Nanos in germline development in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol 1:431–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/15666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda J, Wharton RP. 1999. Recruitment of Nanos to hunchback mRNA by Pumilio. Genes Dev 13:2704–2712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.20.2704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda J, Wharton RP. 2001. Drosophila brain tumor is a translational repressor. Genes Dev 15:762–773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.870801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spassov DS, Jurecic R. 2002. Cloning and comparative sequence analysis of PUM1 and PUM2 genes, human members of the Pumilio family of RNA-binding proteins. Gene 299:195–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01060-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zamore PD, Williamson JR, Lehmann R. 1997. The Pumilio protein binds RNA through a conserved domain that defines a new class of RNA-binding proteins. RNA 3:1421–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaruzelska J, Kotecki M, Kusz K, Spik A, Firpo M, Reijo Pera RA. 2003. Conservation of a Pumilio-Nanos complex from Drosophila germ plasm to human germ cells. Dev Genes Evol 213:120–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Etten J, Schagat TL, Hrit J, Weidmann CA, Brumbaugh J, Coon JJ, Goldstrohm AC. 2012. Human Pumilio proteins recruit multiple deadenylases to efficiently repress messenger RNAs. J Biol Chem 287:36370–36383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.373522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blewett NH, Goldstrohm AC. 2012. A eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein promotes mRNA decapping and is required for PUF repression. Mol Cell Biol 32:4181–4194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00483-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedde M, van Kouwenhove M, Zwart W, Oude Vrielink JA, Elkon R, Agami R. 2010. A Pumilio-induced RNA structure switch in p27-3′ UTR controls miR-221 and miR-222 accessibility. Nat Cell Biol 12:1014–1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles WO, Tschop K, Herr A, Ji JY, Dyson NJ. 2012. Pumilio facilitates miRNA regulation of the E2F3 oncogene. Genes Dev 26:356–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.182568.111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolde MJ, Saka N, Reinert KL, Slack FJ. 2007. The Caenorhabditis elegans pumilio homolog, puf-9, is required for the 3′ UTR-mediated repression of the let-7 microRNA target gene, hbl-1. Dev Biol 305:551–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.040.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friend K, Campbell ZT, Cooke A, Kroll-Conner P, Wickens MP, Kimble J. 2012. A conserved PUF-Ago-eEF1A complex attenuates translation elongation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:176–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Padmanabhan K, Richter JD. 2010. Pumilio 2 controls translation by competing with eIF4E for 7-methyl guanosine cap recognition. RNA 16:221–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.1884610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galgano A, Forrer M, Jaskiewicz L, Kanitz A, Zavolan M, Gerber AP. 2008. Comparative analysis of mRNA targets for human PUF-family proteins suggests extensive interaction with the miRNA regulatory system. PLoS One 3:e3164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber AP, Herschlag D, Brown PO. 2004. Extensive association of functionally and cytotopically related mRNAs with Puf family RNA-binding proteins in yeast. PLoS Biol 2:E79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber AP, Luschnig S, Krasnow MA, Brown PO, Herschlag D. 2006. Genome-wide identification of mRNAs associated with the translational regulator PUMILIO in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:4487–4492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509260103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen D, Zheng W, Lin A, Uyhazi K, Zhao H, Lin H. 2012. Pumilio 1 suppresses multiple activators of p53 to safeguard spermatogenesis. Curr Biol 22:420–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai F, Singh A, King ML. 2012. Xenopus Nanos1 is required to prevent endoderm gene expression and apoptosis in primordial germ cells. Development 139:1476–1486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.079608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuda M, Sasaoka Y, Kiso M, Abe K, Haraguchi S, Kobayashi S, Saga Y. 2003. Conserved role of nanos proteins in germ cell development. Science 301:1239–1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1085222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande G, Calhoun G, Yanowitz JL, Schedl PD. 1999. Novel functions of nanos in downregulating mitosis and transcription during the development of the Drosophila germline. Cell 99:271–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81658-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimova DK, Stevaux O, Frolov MV, Dyson NJ. 2003. Cell cycle-dependent and cell cycle-independent control of transcription by the Drosophila E2F/RB pathway. Genes Dev 17:2308–2320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1116703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlberg J, Degot S, Endege W, Park J, Davies J, Gelfand E, Sawyer J, Conery A, Doench J, Li W, Gonzalez L, Boyce FM, Brizuela L, Labaer J, Grueneberg D, Harlow E. 2005. Screens using RNAi and cDNA expression as surrogates for genetics in mammalian tissue culture cells. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 70:449–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2005.70.047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendenhall EM, Williamson KE, Reyon D, Zou JY, Ram O, Joung JK, Bernstein BE. 2013. Locus-specific editing of histone modifications at endogenous enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 31:1133–1136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Lehmann R. 1991. Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila. Cell 66:637–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90110-K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lin H. 2004. Nanos maintains germline stem cell self-renewal by preventing differentiation. Science 303:2016–2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ram O, Goren A, Amit I, Shoresh N, Yosef N, Ernst J, Kellis M, Gymrek M, Issner R, Coyne M, Durham T, Zhang X, Donaghey J, Epstein CB, Regev A, Bernstein BE. 2011. Combinatorial patterning of chromatin regulators uncovered by genome-wide location analysis in human cells. Cell 147:1628–1639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka K, Hino S, Sakamoto A, Anan K, Takase R, Umehara T, Yokoyama S, Sasaki Y, Nakao M. 2015. Lysine-specific demethylase 2 suppresses lipid influx and metabolism in hepatic cells. Mol Cell Biol 35:1068–1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01404-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan P, Yang F, Di Stefano L, Ji JY, Ouyang J, Nishikawa JL, Toiber D, Kulkarni M, Wang Q, Najafi-Shoushtari SH, Mostoslavsky R, Gygi SP, Gill G, Dyson NJ, Naar AM. 2011. A SIRT1-LSD1 corepressor complex regulates Notch target gene expression and development. Mol Cell 42:689–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles WO, Korenjak M, Griffiths LM, Dyer MA, Provero P, Dyson NJ. 2014. Post-transcriptional gene expression control by NANOS is up-regulated and functionally important in pRb-deficient cells. EMBO J 33:2201–2215. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201488057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahl P, Gullotti L, Heukamp LC, Wolf S, Friedrichs N, Vorreuther R, Solleder G, Bastian PJ, Ellinger J, Metzger E, Schule R, Buettner R. 2006. Androgen receptor coactivators lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 and four and a half LIM domain protein 2 predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Cancer Res 66:11341–11347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Janzer A, Becker A, Zimmer A, Schule R, Buettner R, Kirfel J. 2010. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in ER-negative breast cancers and a biomarker predicting aggressive biology. Carcinogenesis 31:512–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte JH, Lim S, Schramm A, Friedrichs N, Koster J, Versteeg R, Ora I, Pajtler K, Klein-Hitpass L, Kuhfittig-Kulle S, Metzger E, Schule R, Eggert A, Buettner R, Kirfel J. 2009. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 is strongly expressed in poorly differentiated neuroblastoma: implications for therapy. Cancer Res 69:2065–2071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayami S, Kelly JD, Cho HS, Yoshimatsu M, Unoki M, Tsunoda T, Field HI, Neal DE, Yamaue H, Ponder BA, Nakamura Y, Hamamoto R. 2011. Overexpression of LSD1 contributes to human carcinogenesis through chromatin regulation in various cancers. Int J Cancer 128:574–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DJ, Edwards TM, Reinke V, Kelly WG. 2009. A C. elegans LSD1 demethylase contributes to germline immortality by reprogramming epigenetic memory. Cell 137:308–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althoff K, Beckers A, Odersky A, Mestdagh P, Koster J, Bray IM, Bryan K, Vandesompele J, Speleman F, Stallings RL, Schramm A, Eggert A, Sprussel A, Schulte JH. 2013. MiR-137 functions as a tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma by downregulating KDM1A. Int J Cancer 133:1064–1073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris RE, Pargett M, Sutcliffe C, Umulis D, Ashe HL. 2011. Brat promotes stem cell differentiation via control of a bistable switch that restricts BMP signaling. Dev Cell 20:72–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez S, Risolino M, Mandia N, Talotta F, Soini Y, Incoronato M, Condorelli G, Banfi S, Verde P. 2015. miR-340 inhibits tumor cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by targeting multiple negative regulators of p27 in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 34:3240–3250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar