Early Loss of Telomerase Action in Yeast Creates a Dependence on the DNA Damage Response Adaptor Proteins

REFERENCES

• Chang M, Luke B, Kraft C, Li Z, Peter M, Lingner J, Rothstein R. 2009. Telomerase is essential to alleviate pif1-induced replication stress at telomeres. Genetics 183:779–791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.107631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller KM, Rog O, Cooper JP. 2006. Semi-conservative DNA replication through telomeres requires Taz1. Nature 440:824–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drosopoulos WC, Kosiyatrakul ST, Yan Z, Calderano SG, Schildkraut CL. 2012. Human telomeres replicate using chromosome-specific, rather than universal, replication programs. J Cell Biol 197:253–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201112083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meena JK, Cerutti A, Beichler C, Morita Y, Bruhn C, Kumar M, Kraus JM, Speicher MR, Wang Z-Q, Kestler HA, d'Adda di Fagagna F, Günes C, Rudolph KL. 2015. Telomerase abrogates aneuploidy-induced telomere replication stress, senescence and cell depletion. EMBO J 34:1371–1384. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201490070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfeir A, Kosiyatrakul ST, Hockemeyer D, MacRae SL, Karlseder J, Schildkraut CL, de Lange T. 2009. Mammalian telomeres resemble fragile sites and require TRF1 for efficient replication. Cell 138:90–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, Kibe T, Kabir S, de Lange T. 2014. TRF1 negotiates TTAGGG repeat-associated replication problems by recruiting the BLM helicase and the TPP1/POT1 repressor of ATR signaling. Genes Dev 28:2477–2491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.251611.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonomo SBC, Wu Y, Ferguson D, de Lange T. 2009. Mammalian Rif1 contributes to replication stress survival and homology-directed repair. J Cell Biol 187:385–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200902039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lue NF, Chan J, Wright WE, Hurwitz J. 2014. The CDC13-STN1-TEN1 complex stimulates Pol α activity by promoting RNA priming and primase-to-polymerase switch. Nat Commun 5:5762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6762.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dehé P-M, Rog O, Ferreira MG, Greenwood J, Cooper JP. 2012. Taz1 enforces cell-cycle regulation of telomere synthesis. Mol Cell 46:797–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.022.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen L-Y, Lingner J. 2013. CST for the grand finale of telomere replication. Nucleus 4:277–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.25701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Karamysheva Z, Wang L, Shippen DE, Price CM. 2002. Interactions between telomerase and primase physically link the telomere and chromosome replication machinery. Mol Cell Biol 22:5859–5868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.16.5859-5868.2002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vannier J-B, Pavicic-Kaltenbrunner V, Petalcorin MIR, Ding H, Boulton SJ. 2012. RTEL1 dismantles T loops and counteracts telomeric G4-DNA to maintain telomere integrity. Cell 149:795–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T, Saretzki G, Carter NP, Jackson SP. 2003. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426:194–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar JM, Lydall D. 2012. Similarities and differences between “uncapped” telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks. Chromosoma 121:117–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0357-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nautiyal S, DeRisi JL, Blackburn EH. 2002. The genome-wide expression response to telomerase deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9316–9321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142162499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain D, Cooper JP. 2010. Telomeric strategies: means to an end. Annu Rev Genet 44:243–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo J, Toczyski D. 2002. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14:237–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00312-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SW, Chang J, Prescott J, Blackburn EH. 2001. Altering telomere structure allows telomerase to act in yeast lacking ATM kinases. Curr Biol 11:1240–1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00391-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedel AM, Pike BL, Gasser SM. 2009. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:237–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreson BL, Gupta A, Georgieva BP, Rothstein R. 2010. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, Sml1, is sequentially phosphorylated, ubiquitylated and degraded in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 38:6490–6501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chabes A, Domkin V, Thelander L. 1999. Yeast Sml1, a protein inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. J Biol Chem 274:36679–36683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.51.36679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7:1255–1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00270-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SW-L, Blackburn EH. 2003. Telomerase and ATM/Tel1p protect telomeres from nonhomologous end joining. Mol Cell 11:1379–1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00174-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJH, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JFX, Carr AM, Elledge SJ. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 3:958–965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1101-958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bando M, Katou Y, Komata M, Tanaka H, Itoh T, Sutani T, Shirahige K. 2009. Csm3, Tof1, and Mrc1 form a heterotrimeric mediator complex that associates with DNA replication forks. J Biol Chem 284:34355–34365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.065730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin N, Bailly A, Charbonneau M. 2005. Activation of Mrc1, a mediator of the replication checkpoint, by telomere erosion. Biol Cell 97:799–814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BC20040526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsolou A, Lydall D. 2007. Mrc1 protects uncapped budding yeast telomeres from exonuclease EXO1. DNA Repair 6:1607–1617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.05.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolling JA, Boreham DR, Bahen ME, Mitchel RE. 2000. Role of RAD9-dependent cell-cycle checkpoints in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Radiat Biol 76:1273–1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553000050134500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Moghrabi NM, Al-Sharif IS, Aboussekhra A. 2001. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 cell cycle checkpoint gene is required for optimal repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in both G(1) and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2020–2025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.10.2020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J 17:5679–5688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingner J, Hughes TR, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Lundblad V, Cech TR. 1997. Reverse transcriptase motifs in the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Science 276:561–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counter CM, Meyerson M, Eaton EN, Weinberg RA. 1997. The catalytic subunit of yeast telomerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:9202–9207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.17.9202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Negrini S, Ribaud V, Bianchi A, Shore D. 2007. DNA breaks are masked by multiple Rap1 binding in yeast: implications for telomere capping and telomerase regulation. Genes Dev 21:292–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.400907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore D, Bianchi A. 2009. Telomere length regulation: coupling DNA end processing to feedback regulation of telomerase. EMBO J 28:2309–2322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Jay KA, Smith DL, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Zheng J, Tian R, Li H, Blackburn EH. 2015. Early telomerase inactivation accelerates aging independently of telomere length. Cell 160:928–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichard P. 1988. Interactions between deoxyribonucleotide and DNA synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem 57:349–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.002025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose MD, Winston F, Heiter P. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Sambrook J, Russel DW. 2001. Molecular cloning, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Longtine MS, McKenzie A, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 17:1755–1767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1098303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin N, Damon C, Charbonneau M. 2000. Cdc13 cooperates with the yeast Ku proteins and Stn1 to regulate telomerase recruitment. Mol Cell Biol 20:8397–8408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.22.8397-8408.2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bianchi A, Shore D. 2007. Increased association of telomerase with short telomeres in yeast. Genes Dev 21:1726–1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.438907.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeyre C, Shore D. 2013. Regulation of telomere addition at DNA double-strand breaks. Chromosoma 122:159–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-013-0404-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig AJ, Petes TD. 1986. Identification of yeast mutants with altered telomere structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:1398–1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.5.1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 2:329–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80277-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabes A, Georgieva B, Domkin V, Zhao X, Rothstein R, Thelander L. 2003. Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell 112:391–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00075-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5247.357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch NC, Chen ES-W, Buckland R, Wang S-C, Fazio A, Hammet A, Pellicioli A, Chabes A, Tsai M-D, Heierhorst J. 2013. Molecular basis of the essential S phase function of the rad53 checkpoint kinase. Mol Cell Biol 33:3202–3213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00474-13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saban N, Bujak M. 2009. Hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid derivatives as antitumor drugs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:213–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0991-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasullo M, Tsaponina O, Sun M, Chabes A. 2010. Elevated dNTP levels suppress hyper-recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-phase checkpoint mutants. Nucleic Acids Res 38:1195–1203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundblad V, Blackburn EH. 1993. An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues est1-senescence. Cell 73:347–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90234-H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Ly H, Hussain A, Abraham M, Pearl S, Tzfati Y, Parslow TG, Blackburn EH. 2004. A universal telomerase RNA core structure includes structured motifs required for binding the telomerase reverse transcriptase protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14713–14718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405879101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. 2010. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:171–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett JA, Greider CW. 2003. End resection initiates genomic instability in the absence of telomerase. Mol Cell Biol 23:8450–8461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.23.8450-8461.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diede SJ, Gottschling DE. 1999. Telomerase-mediated telomere addition in vivo requires DNA primase and DNA polymerases alpha and delta. Cell 99:723–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81670-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman AR, Dheekollu J, Deng Z, Lee SW, Das MM, Lieberman PM, Noguchi E. 2012. Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres. Cell Cycle 11:2337–2347. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdallah P, Luciano P, Runge KW, Lisby M, Géli V, Gilson E, Teixeira MT. 2009. A two-step model for senescence triggered by a single critically short telomere. Nat Cell Biol 11:988–993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar