Differential Roles for DNA Polymerases Eta, Zeta, and REV1 in Lesion Bypass of Intrastrand versus Interstrand DNA Cross-Links

REFERENCES

• Acharya, N., R. E. Johnson, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2006. Complex formation with Rev1 enhances the proficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase ζ for mismatch extension and for extension opposite from DNA lesions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:9555–9563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertella, M. R., C. M. Green, A. R. Lehmann, and M. J. O'Connor. 2005. A role for polymerase η in the cellular tolerance to cisplatin-induced damage. Cancer Res. 65:9799–9806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, A., K. Lammens, C. Chiocchini, A. Lammens, J. C. Pieck, D. Kuch, K. P. Hopfner, and T. Carell. 2007. Bypass of DNA lesions generated during anticancer treatment with cisplatin by DNA polymerase η. Science 318:967–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist, C. J., and M. B. Kastan. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421:499–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, E., N. M. King, M. F. Bryant, S. Hector, L. Pendyala, S. G. Chaney, and M. Cordeiro-Stone. 2004. The role of DNA polymerase η in translesion synthesis past Platinum-DNA adducts in human fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 64:6469–6475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienko, M., C. M. Green, N. Crosetto, F. Rudolf, G. Zapart, B. Coull, P. Kannouche, G. Wider, M. Peter, A. R. Lehmann, K. Hofmann, and I. Dikic. 2005. Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science 310:1821–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomgarden, R. D., P. J. Lupardus, D. V. Soni, M.-C. Yee, J. M. Ford, and K. A. Cimprich. 2006. Opposing effects of the UV lesion repair protein XPA and UV bypass polymerase η on ATR checkpoint signaling. EMBO J. 25:2614.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., A. Niimi, and A. R. Lehmann. 2009. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination of PCNA in response to stalling of the replication fork. Cell Cycle. 8:689–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, T. S., M. Pacek, M. c. Yee, J. C. Walter, and K. A. Cimprich. 2005. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 19:1040–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper, A. M., P. Nghiem, M. F. Arlt, and T. W. Glover. 2002. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111:779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D. J., P. J. Lupardus, and K. A. Cimprich. 2006. Monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen induced by stalled replication requires uncoupling of DNA polymerase and mini-chromosome maintenance helicase activities. J. Biol. Chem. 281:32081–32088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. w., J. E. Cleaver, F. Hanaoka, C. f. Chang, and K. m. Chou. 2006. A novel role of DNA polymerase η in modulating cellular sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Mol. Cancer Res. 4:257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimprich, K. A., and D. Cortez. 2008. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:616–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. A., D. Huttner, Y. Daigaku, S. Chen, and H. D. Ulrich. 2008. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein A. Mol. Cell 29:625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Feraudy, S., C. L. Limoli, E. Gledzinski, D. Karentz, T. M. Marti, L. Feeney, and J. E. Cleaver. 2007. Pol eta is required for DNA replication during nucleotide deprivation by hydroxyurea. Oncogene 26:5713–5721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva, I. U., P. J. McHugh, P. H. Clingen, and J. A. Hartley. 2000. Defining the roles of nucleotide excision repair and recombination in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7980–7990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronkert, M. L. G., and R. Kanaar. 2001. Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Mutat. Res./DNA Repair 486:217–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Souza, S., and G. C. Walker. 2006. Novel role for the C terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1 in mediating protein-protein interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8173–8182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faili, A., S. Aoufouchi, E. Flatter, Q. Gueranger, C. A. Reynaud, and J. C. Weill. 2002. Induction of somatic hypermutation in immunoglobulin genes is dependent on DNA polymerase iota. Nature 419:944–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Capetillo, O., A. Lee, M. Nussenzweig, and A. Nussenzweig. 2004. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair 3:959–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, E. C., A. R. Lehmann, and R. P. P. Fuchs. 2005. Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? Mol. Cell 18:499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueranger, Q., A. Stary, S. Aoufouchi, A. Faili, A. Sarasin, C. A. Reynaud, and J. C. Weill. 2008. Role of DNA polymerases η, ι, and ζ in UV resistance and UV-induced mutagenesis in a human cell line. DNA Repair 7:1551–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., P. L. Fischhaber, M. J. Luk-Paszyc, Y. Masuda, J. Zhou, K. Kamiya, C. Kisker, and E. C. Friedberg. 2003. Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 22:6621–6630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., E. Sonoda, T. S. Tang, J. L. Parker, A. B. Bielen, S. Takeda, H. D. Ulrich, and E. C. Friedberg. 2006. REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 23:265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., T. S. Tang, M. Bienko, J. L. Parker, A. B. Bielen, E. Sonoda, S. Takeda, H. D. Ulrich, I. Dikic, and E. C. Friedberg. 2006. Ubiquitin-binding motifs in REV1 protein are required for its role in the tolerance of DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8892–8900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanada, K., M. Budzowska, M. Modesti, A. Maas, C. Wyman, J. Essers, and R. Kanaar. 2006. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25:4921–4932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz, J. M., P. B. Nham, E. P. Salazar, and L. H. Thompson. 2006. The Fanconi anemia pathway limits the severity of mutagenesis. DNA Repair 5:875–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, N. G., T. Taniguchi, S. G. Durkin, A. D. D'Andrea, and T. W. Glover. 2005. The Fanconi anemia pathway is required for the DNA replication stress response and for the regulation of common fragile site stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:693–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannouche, P., B. C. Broughton, M. Volkner, F. Hanoaka, L. H. F. Mullenders, and A. R. Lehmann. 2001. Domain structure, localization, and function of DNA polymerase η, defective in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells. Genes Dev. 15:158–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kannouche, P. L., J. Wing, and A. R. Lehmann. 2004. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 14:491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelland, L. 2007. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7:573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laquerbe, A., M. Sala-Trepat, C. Vives, M. Escarceller, and D. Papadopoulo. 1999. Molecular spectra of HPRT deletion mutations in circulating T-lymphocytes in Fanconi anemia patients. Mutat. Res./Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 431:341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, C. W., and D. C. Hinkle. 1996. DNA polymerase zeta and the control of DNA damage induced mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cancer Surv. 28:21–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirchandani, K. D., R. M. McCaffrey, and A. D. D'Andrea. 2008. The Fanconi anemia core complex is required for efficient point mutagenesis and Rev1 foci assembly. DNA Repair 7:902–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovan, G. L., and A. D. D'Andrea. 2009. How the Fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome. Annu. Rev. Gen. 43:223–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedernhofer, L. J., H. Odijk, M. Budzowska, E. van Drunen, A. Maas, A. F. Theil, J. de Wit, N. G. J. Jaspers, H. B. Beverloo, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and R. Kanaar. 2004. The structure-specific endonuclease Ercc1-Xpf is required to resolve DNA interstrand cross-link-induced double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5776–5787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedzwiedz, W., G. Mosedale, M. Johnson, C. Y. Ong, P. Pace, and K. J. Patel. 2004. The Fanconi anaemia gene FANCC promotes homologous recombination and error-prone DNA repair. Mol. Cell 15:607–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niimi, A., S. Brown, S. Sabbioneda, P. L. Kannouche, A. Scott, A. Yasui, C. M. Green, and A. R. Lehmann. 2008. Regulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:16125–16130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohashi, E., Y. Murakumo, N. Kanjo, J. Akagi, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, and H. Ohmori. 2004. Interaction of hREV1 with three human Y-family DNA polymerases. Genes Cells 9:523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, T., E. Sonoda, M. Yoshimura, Y. Kawano, H. Saya, M. Kohzaki, and S. Takeda. 2005. Multiple roles of vertebrate REV genes in DNA repair and recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:6103–6111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda, T., X. Lin, J. Trang, and S. B. Howell. 2005. Suppression of hREV1 expression reduces the rate at which human ovarian carcinoma cells acquire resistance to cisplatin. Mol. Pharmacol. 67:1852–1860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulo, D., C. Guillouf, H. Mohrenweiser, and E. Moustacchi. 1990. Hypomutability in Fanconi anemia cells is associated with increased deletion frequency at the HPRT locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:8383–8387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S., and L. Prakash. 2002. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev. 16:1872–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S., R. E. Johnson, and L. Prakash. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:317–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räschle, M., P. Knipscheer, M. Enoiu, T. Angelov, J. Sun, J. D. Griffith, T. E. Ellenberger, O. D. Schärer, and J. C. Walter. 2008. Mechanism of replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell 134:969–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogakou, E. P., C. Boon, C. Redon, and W. M. Bonner. 1999. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146:905–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothfuss, A., and M. Grompe. 2004. Repair kinetics of genomic interstrand DNA cross-links: evidence for DNA double-strand break-dependent activation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbioneda, S., A. M. Gourdin, C. M. Green, A. Zotter, G. Giglia-Mari, A. Houtsmuller, W. Vermeulen, and A. R. Lehmann. 2008. Effect of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination and chromatin structure on the dynamic properties of the Y-family DNA polymerases. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:5193–5202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., A. A. Davies, H. D. Ulrich, and P. J. Mchugh. 2006. DNA interstrand crosslink repair during G1 involves nucleotide excision repair and DNA polymerase zeta. EMBO J. 25:1285–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, L. B., N. H. Chehab, A. Malikzay, and T. D. Halazonetis. 2000. p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 151:1381–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachar, S., O. Ziv, S. Avkin, S. Adar, J. Wittschieben, T. Reiβner, S. Chaney, E. C. Friedberg, Z. Wang, T. Carell, N. Geacintov, and Z. Livneh. 2009. Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J. 28:383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X., S. Jun, L. E. O'Neal, E. Sonoda, M. Bemark, J. E. Sale, and L. Li. 2006. REV3 and REV1 play major roles in recombination-independent repair of DNA interstrand cross-links mediated by monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). J. Biol. Chem. 281:13869–13872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiomi, N., M. Mori, H. Tsuji, T. Imai, H. Inoue, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, and T. Shiomi. 2007. Human RAD18 is involved in S phase-specific single-strand break repair without PCNA monoubiquitination. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. J., and J. E. Sale. 2003. Rev1 is essential for DNA damage tolerance and non-templated immunoglobulin gene mutation in a vertebrate cell line. EMBO J. 22:1654–1664.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonoda, E., T. Okada, G. Y. Zhao, S. Tateishi, K. Araki, M. Yamaizumi, T. Yagi, N. S. Verkaik, G. van, M. Takata, and S. Takeda. 2003. Multiple roles of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of polζ in maintaining genome stability in vertebrates. EMBO J. 22:3188–3197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelter, P., and H. D. Ulrich. 2003. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425:188–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissier, A., P. Kannouche, M. P. Reck, A. R. Lehmann, R. P. Fuchs, and A. Cordonnier. 2004. Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol eta and REV1 protein. DNA Repair 3:1503–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., S. Matsuoka, P. B. Carpenter, and S. J. Elledge. 2002. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 298:1435–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, K., S. Tateishi, M. Kawasuji, T. Tsurimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2004. Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J. 23:3886–3896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, L. S., B. K. Minesinger, M. E. Wiltrout, S. D'Souza, R. V. Woodruff, and G. C. Walker. 2009. Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73:134–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., X. Lin, T. Okuda, and S. B. Howell. 2004. DNA polymerase zeta regulates cisplatin cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the rate of development of cisplatin resistance. Cancer Res. 64:8029–8035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., X. Liu, L. Li, and R. Legerski. 2007. Double-strand breaks induce homologous recombinational repair of interstrand cross-links via cooperation of MSH2, ERCC1-XPF, REV3, and the Fanconi anemia pathway. DNA Repair 6:1670–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar