Spreading of a Corepressor Linked to Action of Long-Range Repressor Hairy

REFERENCES

• Arnosti, D. N. 2004. Multiple mechanisms of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes, p. 33-67. In M. Gossen, J. Kaufmann, and S. J. Triezenberg (ed.), Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Arnosti, D. N., S. Gray, S. Barolo, J. Zhou, and M. Levine. 1996. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 15:3659–3666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barolo, S., and M. Levine. 1997. hairy mediates dominant repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 16:2883–2891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuchle, D., G. Struhl, and J. Muller. 2001. Polycomb group proteins and heritable silencing of Drosophila Hox genes. Development 128:993–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi-Frias, D., A. Orian, J. J. Delrow, J. Vazquez, A. E. Rosales-Nieves, and S. M. Parkhurst. 2004. Hairy transcriptional repression targets and cofactor recruitment in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2:e178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrozza, M. J., S. John, A. K. Sil, J. E. Hopper, and J. L. Workman. 2002. Gal80 confers specificity on HAT complex interactions with activators. J. Biol. Chem. 277:24648–24652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, G., J. Fernandez, S. Mische, and A. J. Courey. 1999. A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor Groucho in Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 13:2218–2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., and A. J. Courey. 2000. Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression. Gene 249:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courey, A. J., and S. Jia. 2001. Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. Genes Dev. 15:2786–2796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie, J. K., D. G. Edmondson, C. B. Coco, and S. Y. Dent. 2003. Tup1-Ssn6 interacts with multiple class I histone deacetylases in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 278:50158–50162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davie, J. K., R. J. Trumbly, and S. Y. Dent. 2002. Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:693–703.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, R. L., and D. L. Turner. 2001. Vertebrate hairy and Enhancer of split related proteins: transcriptional repressors regulating cellular differentiation and embryonic patterning. Oncogene 20:8342–8357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducker, C. E., and R. T. Simpson. 2000. The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome. EMBO J. 19:400–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flores-Saaib, R. D., and A. J. Courey. 2000. Analysis of Groucho-histone interactions suggests mechanistic similarities between Groucho- and Tup1-mediated repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4189–4196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmour, D. S., and J. T. Lis. 1986. RNA polymerase II interacts with the promoter region of the noninduced hsp70 gene in Drosophila melanogaster cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3984–3989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., P. Szymanski, and M. Levine. 1994. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8:1829–1838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, S. R., and A. D. Johnson. 2005. Genome-wide analysis of the functions of a conserved surface on the corepressor Tup1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:2605–2613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyuris J., E. Golemis, H. Chertkov, and R. Brent. 1993. Cdi1, a human G1 and S phase protein phosphatase that associates with Cdk2. Cell 75:791–803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallberg, M., G. Z. Hu, S. Tronnersjo, Z. Shaikhibrahim, D. Balciunas, S. Bjorklund, and H. Ronne. 2006. Functional and physical interactions within the middle domain of the yeast mediator. Mol. Genet. Genomics 276:197–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, G. F., B. S. Strunk, C. Margulies, T. Priputin, X. D. Wang, R. Amey, B. A. Pabst, D. Kosman, J. Reinitz, and D. N. Arnosti. 1999. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126:1201–1210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang, L., W. Zhang, and S. Y. Roth. 1997. Amino termini of histones H3 and H4 are required for a1-α2 repression in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6555–6562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingham, P., K. R. Howard, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1985. Transcription pattern of the Drosophila segmentation gene hairy. Nature 318:439–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, B. H., S. M. Wainwright, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 23 November 2007, posting date. Differential in vivo requirements for oligomerization during Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO Rep. 9:76-83. [Epub ahead of print.]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang, J., H. Cai, Q. Zhou, and M. Levine. 1993. Conversion of a dorsal-dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. EMBO J. 12:3201–3209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, I. F. G., N. J. Francis, and R. E. Kingston. 2002. Native and recombinant polycomb group complexes establish a selective block to template accessibility to repress transcription in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7919–7928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulkarni, M. M., and D. N. Arnosti. 2003. Information display by transcriptional enhancers. Development 130:6569–6575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulkarni, M. M., and D. N. Arnosti. 2005. cis-regulatory logic of short-range transcriptional repression in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3411–3420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdistani, S. K., and M. Grunstein. 2003. In vivo protein-protein and protein-DNA crosslinking for genomewide binding microarray. Methods 31:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larschan, E., and F. Winston. 2001. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15:1946–1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, M., S. Chatterjee, and K. Struhl. 2000. Genetic analysis of the role of Pol II holoenzyme components in repression by the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor in yeast. Genetics 155:1535–1542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moazed, D., A. D. Rudner, J. Huang, G. J. Hoppe, and J. C. Tanny. 2004. A model for step-wise assembly of heterochromatin in yeast. Novartis Found. Symp. 259:48–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller, J., and J. A. Kassis. 2006. Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16:476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalley, K., S. A. Johnston, and T. Kodadek. 2006. Proteolytic turnover of the Gal4 transcription factor is not required for function in vivo. Nature 442:1054–1057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, E. Bajor, S. Barolo, S. Small, and M. Levine. 1998. dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 17:7009–7020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, and M. Levine. 2001. Local action of long-range repressors in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 20:2246–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohsako, S., J. Hyer, G. Panganiban, I. Oliver, and M. Caudy. 1994. Hairy function as a DNA-binding helix-loop-helix repressor of Drosophila sensory organ formation. Genes Dev. 8:2743–2755.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paroush, Z., R. L. Finley, Jr., T. Kidd, S. M. Wainwright, P. W. Ingham, R. Brent, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1994. Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation, and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins. Cell 79:805–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrotta, V. 1988. Vectors for P-mediated transformation in Drosophila. Biotechnology 10:437–456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poortinga, G., M. Watanabe, and S. M. Parkhurst. 1998. Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 17:2067–2078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. I., and S. M. Parkhurst. 2002. Drosophila Sir2 is required for heterochromatic silencing and by euchromatic Hairy/E(Spl) bHLH repressors in segmentation and sex determination. Cell 109:447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushlow, C. A., A. Hogan, S. M. Pinchin, K. M. Howe, M. Lardelli, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1989. The Drosophila hairy protein acts in both segmentation and bristle patterning and shows homology to N-myc. EMBO J. 8:3095–3103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz, Y. B., and V. Pirrotta. 2007. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekinger, E. A., and D. S. Gross. 1999. SIR repression of a yeast heat shock gene: UAS and TATA footprints persist within heterochromatin. EMBO J. 18:7041–7055.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sekiya, T., and K. S. Zaret. 2007. Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg proteins: genomic site recruitment generates compacted chromatin in vitro and impairs activator binding in vivo. Mol. Cell 28:291–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small, S., D. N. Arnosti, and M. Levine. 1993. Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119:762–772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small, S., A. Blair, and M. Levine. 1992. Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 11:4047–4057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., P. Hasson, Z. Paroush, and A. J. Courey. 2004. Groucho oligomerization is required for repression in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4341–4350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stebbins, J. L., and S. J. Triezenberg. 2004. Identification, mutational analysis, and coactivator requirements of two distinct transcriptional activation domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hap4 protein. Eukaryot. Cell 3:339–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takebayashi, K., Y. Sasai, Y. Sakai, T. Watanabe, S. Nakanishi, and R. Kageyama. 1994. Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5150–5156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripic, T., D. G. Edmondson, J. K. Davie, B. D. Strahl, and S. Y. Dent. 2006. The Set2 methyltransferase associates with Ssn6 yet Tup1-Ssn6 repression is independent of histone methylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 339:905–914.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Doren, M., A. M. Bailey, J. Esnayra, K. Ede, and J. W. Posakony. 1994. Negative regulation of proneural gene activity: hairy is a direct transcriptional repressor of achaete. Genes Dev. 8:2729–2742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, X., C. Lee, D. S. Gilmour, and J. P. Gergen. 2007. Transcription elongation controls cell fate specification in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21:1031–1036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson, A. D., D. G. Edmondson, J. R. Bone, Y. Mukai, Y. Yu, W. Du, D. J. Stillman, and S. Y. Roth. 2000. Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737–2744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, K. A. J., and S. T. Crews. 1993. CNS midline enhancers of the Drosophila slit and Toll genes. Mech. Dev. 40:141–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., N. Suka, M. Carlson, and M. Grunstein. 2001. TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol. Cell 7:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlinger, J., R. P. Zinzen, A. Stark, M. Kellis, H. Zhang, R. A. Young, and M. Levine. 2007. Whole-genome ChIP-chip analysis of Dorsal, Twist, and Snail suggests integration of diverse patterning processes in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21:385–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng, P. Y., C. R. Vakoc, Z. C. Chen, G. A. Blobel, and S. L. Berger. 2006. In vivo dual cross-linking for identification of indirect DNA-associated proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BioTechniques 41:694–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and M. Levine. 1999. Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:535–540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar