RSC Facilitates Rad59-Dependent Homologous Recombination between Sister Chromatids by Promoting Cohesin Loading at DNA Double-Strand Breaks

REFERENCES

• Baetz, K. K., N. J. Krogan, A. Emili, J. Greenblatt, and P. Hieter. 2004. The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1232–1244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bai, Y., and L. S. Symington. 1996. A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10:2025–2037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bao, Y., and X. Shen. 2007. Chromatin remodeling in DNA double-strand break repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17:126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R. et al. 1996. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87:1249–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R. et al. 1999. Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. Mol. Cell 4:715–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaban, Y. et al. 2008. Structure of a RSC-nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:1272–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, B., J. Huang, B. R. Cairns, and B. C. Laurent. 2005. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 19:1656–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. P., and L. S. Symington. 2003. The Rad52-Rad59 complex interacts with Rad51 and replication protein A. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2:1127–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. P., and L. S. Symington. 2001. The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics 159:515–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, A. et al. 2008. Defective break-induced replication leads to half-crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179:1845–1860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mayolo, A. A. et al. 2010. The rad52-y66A allele alters the choice of donor template during spontaneous chromosomal recombination. DNA Repair (Amst.) 9:23–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong, Z., and M. Fasullo. 2003. Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2576–2585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downs, J. A., M. C. Nussenzweig, and A. Nussenzweig. 2007. Chromatin dynamics and the preservation of genetic information. Nature 447:951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasullo, M. T., and R. W. Davis. 1987. Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84:6215–6219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng, Q. et al. 2007. Rad52 and Rad59 exhibit both overlapping and distinct functions. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6:27–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florio, C. et al. 2007. A study of biochemical and functional interactions of Htl1p, a putative component of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rsc chromatin-remodeling complex. Gene 395:72–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gasior, S. L., A. K. Wong, Y. Kora, A. Shinohara, and D. K. Bishop. 1998. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with rad55 and rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev. 12:2208–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. C., and J. E. Haber. 2006. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40:209–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, S. L., A. A. Firmenich, P. Massey, R. Banerjee, and P. Berg. 1998. Studies of the interaction between Rad52 protein and the yeast single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4400–4406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidinger-Pauli, J. M., E. Unal, V. Guacci, and D. Koshland. 2008. The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion. Mol. Cell 31:47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., J. M. Hsu, and B. C. Laurent. 2004. The RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex is required for cohesin's association with chromosome arms. Mol. Cell 13:739–750.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ira, G., D. Satory, and J. E. Haber. 2006. Conservative inheritance of newly synthesized DNA in double-strand break-induced gene conversion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:9424–9429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jablonovich, Z., B. Liefshitz, R. Steinlauf, and M. Kupiec. 1999. Characterization of the role played by the RAD59 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ectopic recombination. Curr. Genet. 36:13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaskelioff, M., S. Van Komen, J. E. Krebs, P. Sung, and C. L. Peterson. 2003. Rad54p is a chromatin remodeling enzyme required for heteroduplex DNA joint formation with chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 278:9212–9218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaye, J. A. et al. 2004. DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr. Biol. 14:2096–2106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent, N. A., A. L. Chambers, and J. A. Downs. 2007. Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double-strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J. Biol. Chem. 282:27693–27701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J. S., T. B. Krasieva, V. LaMorte, A. M. Taylor, and K. Yokomori. 2002. Specific recruitment of human cohesin to laser-induced DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 277:45149–45153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzuolo, C. et al. 2001. The HTL1 gene (YCR020W-b) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is necessary for growth at 37 degrees C, and for the conservation of chromosome stability and fertility. Yeast 18:1317–1330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lea, D. E., and C. A. Coulson. 1949. The distribution in the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49:264–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Y. Zhang, and S. E. Lee. 2008. Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454:543–546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, S. E. et al. 1998. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. et al. 2008. Microarray-based genetic screen defines SAW1, a gene required for Rad1/Rad10-dependent processing of recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell 30:325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, B., J. Qiu, K. Ratnakumar, and B. C. Laurent. 2007. RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 17:1432–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorente, B., C. E. Smith, and L. S. Symington. 2008. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7:859–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, Y., M. Zhang, and R. D. Kornberg. 1999. Histone octamer transfer by a chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 96:389–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. M. et al. 2003. Dissecting the pet18 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: HTL1 encodes a 7-kDa polypeptide that interacts with components of the RSC complex. Mol. Genet. Genomics 269:321–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyndaker, A. M., and E. Alani. 2009. A tale of tails: insights into the coordination of 3′ end processing during homologous recombination. Bioessays 31:315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachern, M. J., and J. E. Haber. 2006. Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75:111–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou, E. P., and L. S. Symington. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, K. E., and J. L. Workman. 2002. The complexity of chromatin remodeling and its links to cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1603:19–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New, J. H., T. Sugiyama, E. Zaitseva, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 1998. Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A. Nature 391:407–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osley, M. A., T. Tsukuda, and J. A. Nickoloff. 2007. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair. Mutat. Res. 618:65–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabla, R., V. Pawar, H. Zhang, and W. Siede. 2006. Characterization of checkpoint responses to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: basic protocols. Methods Enzymol. 409:101–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmbos, P. L., J. M. Daley, and T. E. Wilson. 2005. Mutations of the Yku80 C terminus and Xrs2 FHA domain specifically block yeast nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10782–10790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pâques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petukhova, G., S. A. Stratton, and P. Sung. 1999. Single strand DNA binding and annealing activities in the yeast recombination factor Rad59. J. Biol. Chem. 274:33839–33842.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romeo, M. J. et al. 2002. HTL1 encodes a novel factor that interacts with the RSC chromatin remodeling complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8165–8174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Filippo, J., P. Sung, and H. Klein. 2008. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:229–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong, C. et al. 2008. Molecular anatomy of the recombination mediator function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52. J. Biol. Chem. 283:12166–12174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, E. Y. et al. 2007. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:1602–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, E. Y., J. L. Ma, J. H. Oum, Y. Yanez, and S. E. Lee. 2005. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3934–3944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinohara, A., and T. Ogawa. 1998. Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination. Nature 391:404–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., and C. L. Peterson. 2005. A conserved Swi2/Snf2 ATPase motif couples ATP hydrolysis to chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5880–5892.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, J., and R. Rothstein. 1999. An allele of RFA1 suppresses RAD52-dependent double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 151:447–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ström, L. et al. 2007. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317:242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ström, L., H. B. Lindroos, K. Shirahige, and C. Sjogren. 2004. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16:1003–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., T. Goldfarb, B. Studamire, E. Alani, and J. E. Haber. 2004. Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:9315–9320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., and J. E. Haber. 1992. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:563–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., G. Ira, and J. E. Haber. 2000. DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5300–5309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, P. 1997. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28194–28197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, P., and S. A. Stratton. 1996. Yeast Rad51 recombinase mediates polar DNA strand exchange in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27983–27986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington, L. S. 2002. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:630–670, table of contents.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treich, I., L. Ho, and M. Carlson. 1998. Direct interaction between Rsc6 and Rsc8/Swh3, two proteins that are conserved in SWI/SNF-related complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:3739–3745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unal, E. et al. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16:991–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal, E., J. M. Heidinger-Pauli, and D. Koshland. 2007. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister chromatid cohesion through EcoI (Ctf7). Science 317:245–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Attikum, H., and S. M. Gasser. 2005. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle 4:1011–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Attikum, H., and S. M. Gasser. 2005. The histone code at DNA breaks: a guide to repair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:757–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstrepen, K. J., A. Jansen, F. Lewitter, and G. R. Fink. 2005. Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nat. Genet. 37:986–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. S. et al. 2009. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell 139:87–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and B. R. Cairns. 2006. The RSC chromatin remodeling complex bears an essential fungal-specific protein module with broad functional roles. Genetics 172:795–809.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittmeyer, J., A. Saha, and B. Cairns. 2004. DNA translocation and nucleosome remodeling assays by the RSC chromatin remodeling complex. Methods Enzymol. 377:322–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong, L. Y., J. Recht, and B. C. Laurent. 2006. Chromatin remodeling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Mol. Histol. 37:261–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, Y., T. Sugiyama, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2006. DNA annealing mediated by Rad52 and Rad59 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 281:15441–15449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, Y. et al. 2007. Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:639–646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu, Z., W. H. Chung, E. Y. Shim, S. E. Lee, and G. Ira. 2008. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar