Phosphorylation of Rad55 on Serines 2, 8, and 14 Is Required for Efficient Homologous Recombination in the Recovery of Stalled Replication Forks

REFERENCES

• Bärtsch, S., L. E. Kang, and L. S. Symington. 2000. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1194–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashkirov, V. I., E. V. Bashkirova, E. Haghnazari, and W. D. Heyer. 2003. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1441–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashkirov, V. I., K. Herzberg, E. Haghnazari, A. S. Vlasenko, and W. D. Heyer. 2006. DNA-damage induced phosphorylation of Rad55 protein as a sentinel for DNA damage checkpoint activation in S. cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 409:166–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bashkirov, V. I., J. S. King, E. V. Bashkirova, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, and W. D. Heyer. 2000. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4393–4404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bianco, P. R., R. B. Tracy, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 1998. DNA strand exchange proteins: a biochemical and physical comparison. Front. Biosci. 3:570–603.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binz, S. K., Y. Lao, D. F. Lowry, and M. F. Wold. 2003. The phosphorylation domain of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 278:35584–35591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boddy, M. N., A. Lopez-Girona, P. Shanahan, H. Interthal, W. D. Heyer, and P. Russell. 2000. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:8758–8766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, S., T. Hryciw, and W. Xiao. 2001. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486:167–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brush, G. S., and T. J. Kelly. 2000. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:3725–3732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. M. 2002. DNA structure dependent checkpoints as regulators of DNA repair. DNA Repair 1:983–994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carty, M. P., M. Zernikkobak, S. Mcgrath, and K. Dixon. 1994. UV light-induced DNA synthesis arrest in HeLa cells is associated with changes in phosphorylation of human single-stranded DNA-binding protein. EMBO J. 13:2114–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspari, T., J. M. Murray, and A. M. Carr. 2002. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16:1195–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejka, P., V. Vondrejs, and Z. Storchova. 2001. Dissection of the functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 postreplicative repair group in mutagenesis and UV sensitivity. Genetics 159:953–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., S. S. F. Yuan, W. Liu, Y. Xu, K. Trujillo, B. W. Song, F. Cong, S. P. Goff, Y. Wu, R. Arlinghaus, D. Baltimore, P. J. Gasser, M. S. Park, P. Sung, and E. Lee. 1999. Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12748–12752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici, M., V. Baldo, D. Mantiero, F. Lottersberger, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2004. A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10126–10144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clever, B., H. Interthal, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, J. King, M. Sigrist, and W. D. Heyer. 1997. Recombinational repair in yeast: functional interactions between Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. EMBO J. 16:2535–2544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amours, D., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15:2238–2249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desany, B., A. A. Alcasabas, J. B. Bachant, and S. J. Elledge. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reference deleted.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, G. S., and L. S. Symington. 2002. Mutations in yeast Rad51 that partially bypass the requirement for Rad55 and Rad57 in DNA repair by increasing the stability of Rad51-DNA complexes. EMBO J. 21:3160–3170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haghnazari, E., and W.-D. Heyer. 2004. The DNA damage checkpoints pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a DNA double stranded gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:4257–4268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ira, G., A. Pellicioli, A. Balijja, X. Wang, S. Fiorani, W. Carotenuto, G. Liberi, D. Bressan, L. H. Wan, N. M. Hollingsworth, J. E. Haber, and M. Foiani. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeggo, P. A., A. M. Carr, and A. R. Lehmann. 1998. Splitting the ATM: distinct repair and checkpoint defects in ataxia-telangiectasia. Trends Genet. 14:312–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., and L. S. Symington. 1995. Functional differences and interactions among the putative RecA homologs Rad51, Rad55, and Rad57. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4843–4850.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanoh, Y., K. Tamai, and K. Shirahige. 2006. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks. Gene 377:88–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kantake, N., T. Sugiyama, R. D. Kolodner, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2003. The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23410–23417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, H. S., and S. J. Brill. 2001. Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3725–3737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, R. D., C. D. Putnam, and K. Myung. 2002. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297:552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci, L., S. Van Komen, Y. Li, J. Villemain, M. S. Reddy, H. Klein, T. Ellenberger, and P. Sung. 2003. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423:305–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh, B. O., and L. S. Symington. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:233–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhne, M., E. Riballo, N. Rief, K. Rothkamm, P. A. Jeggo, and M. Lobrich. 2004. A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res. 64:500–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. E., J. K. Moore, A. Holmes, K. Umezu, R. D. Kolodner, and J. E. Haber. 1998. Saccharomyces Ku70, Mre11/Rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. E., A. Pellicioli, M. B. Vaze, N. Sugawara, A. Malkova, M. Foiani, and J. E. Haber. 2003. Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8913–8923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, S.-J., M. F. Schwartz, J. K. Duong, and D. F. Stern. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6300–6314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberi, G., I. Chiolo, A. Pellicioli, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and M. Foiani. 2000. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19:5027–5038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liefshitz, B., R. Steinlauf, A. Friedl, F. Eckardt-Schupp, and M. Kupiec. 1998. Genetic interactions between mutants of the ‘error-prone’ repair group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their effect on recombination and mutagenesis. Mutat. Res. 407:135–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim, D. S., S. T. Kim, B. Xu, R. S. Maser, J. Y. Lin, J. H. J. Petrini, and M. B. Kastan. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, V. F., and D. T. Weaver. 1993. The ionizing radiation-induced replication protein A phosphorylation response differs between ataxia telangiectasia and normal human cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:7222–7231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. L., J. Y. Masson, R. Shah, P. O'Regan, and S. C. West. 2004. RAD51C is required for Holliday junction processing in mammalian cells. Science 303:243–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lovett, S. T., and R. K. Mortimer. 1987. Characterization of null mutants of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of temperature, osmotic strength and mating type. Genetics 116:547–553.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacCoss, M. J., W. H. McDonald, A. Saraf, R. Sadygov, J. M. Clark, J. J. Tasto, K. L. Gould, D. Wolters, M. Washburn, A. Weiss, J. I. Clark, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Shotgun identification of protein modifications from protein complexes and lens tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7900–7905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazin, A. V., C. J. Bornarth, J. A. Solinger, W.-D. Heyer, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2000. Rad54 protein is targeted to pairing loci by the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. Mol. Cell 6:583–592.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, W. H., R. Ohi, D. Miyamoto, T. J. Mitchison, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Comparison of three directly coupled HPLC MS/MS strategies for identification of proteins from complex mixtures: single-dimension LC-MS/MS, 2-phase MudPIT, and 3-phase MudPIT. Int. J. Mass Spectrometry 219:245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, J., and D. Toczyski. 2002. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, B., G. Grompone, M. J. Flores, and V. Bidnenko. 2004. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12783–12788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minesinger, B. K., and S. Jinks-Robertson. 2005. Roles of RAD6 epistasis group members in spontaneous Polzeta-dependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169:1939–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., E. Sonoda, N. Takao, A. Shinohara, K. Yamamoto, and S. Takeda. 2000. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, K., C. Chen, and R. D. Kolodner. 2001. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411:1073–1076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New, J. H., T. Sugiyama, E. Zaitseva, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 1998. Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A. Nature 391:407–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, C. J., and B. Zhivotovsky. 2004. DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 23:2797–2808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg, K. A., R. J. Michelson, C. W. Putnam, and T. A. Weinert. 2002. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36:617–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. J., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17:1755–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. J., S. J. Elledge, and L. Zou. 2002. Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 12:509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papouli, E., S. H. Chen, A. A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, and H. D. Ulrich. 2005. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19:123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicioli, A., S. B. Lee, C. Lucca, M. Foiani, and J. E. Haber. 2001. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfander, B., G. L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuraman, M. K., E. A. Winzeler, D. Collingwood, S. Hunt, L. Wodicka, A. Conway, D. J. Lockhart, R. W. Davis, B. J. Brewer, and W. J. Fangman. 2001. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., J. K. Duong, Z. X. Sun, J. S. Morrow, D. Pradhan, and D. F. Stern. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, C. S., L. T. Hansen, J. Dziegielewski, R. G. Syljuasen, C. Lundin, J. Bartek, and T. Helleday. 2005. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homolgous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J. E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:209–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sung, P. 1997. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28194–28197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, P. 1997. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11:1111–1121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tercero, J. A., and J. F. X. Diffley. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercero, J. A., M. P. Longhese, and J. F. X. Diffley. 2003. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11:1323–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umezu, K., N. Sugawara, C. Chen, J. E. Haber, and R. D. Kolodner. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148:989–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui, T., H. Ogawa, and J. H. J. Petrini. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassin, V. M., M. S. Wold, and J. A. Borowiec. 2004. Replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1930–1943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veaute, X., J. Jeusset, C. Soustelle, S. C. Kowalczykowski, E. Le Cam, and F. Fabre. 2003. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423:309–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, G. M., and A. M. Carr. 2001. The evolution of diverse biological responses to DNA damage: insights from yeast and p53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E277–E286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and J. E. Haber. 2004. Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol. 2:104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Weichselbaum, R. R., J. Nove, and J. B. Little. 1978. Deficient recovery from potentially lethal radiation damage in ataxia telangiectasia and xeroderma pigmentosum. Nature 271:261–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, M. S. 1997. Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:61–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolner, B., S. van Komen, P. Sung, and C. L. Peterson. 2003. Recruitment of the recombinational repair machinery to a DNA double-strand break in yeast. Mol. Cell 12:221–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X. H., V. Ranganathan, D. S. Weisman, W. F. Heine, D. N. Ciccone, T. B. O'Neill, K. E. Crick, K. A. Pierce, W. S. Lane, G. Rathbum, D. M. Livingston, and D. T. Weaver. 2000. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 405:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, W., B. L. Chow, S. Broomfield, and M. Hanna. 2000. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. Genetics 155:1633–1641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiao, W., B. L. Chow, and L. Rathgeber. 1996. The repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 30:461–468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuan, Z. M., Y. Y. Huang, T. Ishiko, S. Nakada, T. Utsugisawa, S. Kharbanda, R. Wang, P. Sung, A. Shinohara, R. Weichselbaum, and D. Kufe. 1998. Regulation of Rad51 function by c-Abl in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 273:3799–3802.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao, S., Y. C. Weng, S. S. Yuan, Y. T. Lin, H. C. Hsu, S. C. Lin, E. Gerbino, M. H. Song, M. Z. Zdzienicka, R. A. Gatti, J. W. Shay, Y. Ziv, Y. Shiloh, and E. Y. Lee. 2000. Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Nature 405:473–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B. B. S., and S. J. Elledge. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, L., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar