A Divergent Sm Fold in EDC3 Proteins Mediates DCP1 Binding and P-Body Targeting

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, M., and T. Lengauer. 2004. Novel Sm-like proteins with long C-terminal tails and associated methyltransferases. FEBS Lett. 569:18–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anantharaman, V., and L. Aravind. 2004. Novel conserved domains in proteins with predicted roles in eukaryotic cell-cycle regulation, decapping and RNA stability. BMC Genomics 5:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouveret, E., G. Rigaut, A. Shevchenko, M. Wilm, and B. Seraphin. 2000. A Sm-like protein complex that participates in mRNA degradation. EMBO J. 19:1661–1671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng, Z., J. Coller, R. Parker, and H. Song. 2005. Crystal structure and functional analysis of DEAD-box protein Dhh1p. RNA 11:1258–1270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, S. X., R. J. Morris, F. J. Fernandez, M. Ben Jelloul, M. Kakaris, V. Parthasarathy, V. S. Lamzin, G. J. Kleywegt, and A. Perrakis. 2004. Towards complete validated models in the next generation of ARP/wARP. Acta Crystallogr. D 60:2222–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M., M. Hulko, S. Djuranovic, V. Truffault, K. Koretke, J. Martin, and A. N. Lupas. 2006. Common evolutionary origin of swapped-hairpin and double-psi beta barrels. Structure 14:1489–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. M., L. Cubeddu, N. Naidoo, S. J. Harrop, G. D. Kornfeld, I. W. Dawes, P. M. Curmi, and B. C. Mabbutt. 2003. Homomeric ring assemblies of eukaryotic Sm proteins have affinity for both RNA and DNA. Crystal structure of an oligomeric complex of yeast SmF. J. Biol. Chem. 278:17291–17298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornilescu, G., F. Delaglio, and A. Bax. 1999. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13:289–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks, T., M. Coles, and H. Kessler. 1999. An efficient strategy for assignment of cross-peaks in 3D heteronuclear NOESY experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 15:177–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diercks, T., M. Daniels, and R. Kaptein. 2005. Extended flip-back schemes for sensitivity enhancement in multidimensional HSQC-type out-and-back experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 33:243–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emsley, P., and K. Cowtan. 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60:2126–2132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulalio, A., I. Behm-Ansmant, and E. Izaurralde. 2007. P bodies: at the crossroads of post-transcriptional pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulalio, A., J. Rehwinkel, M. Stricker, E. Huntzinger, S.-F. Yang, T. Doerks, S. Dorner, P. Peer Bork, M. Boutros, and E. Izaurralde. 2007. Target-specific requirements for enhancers of decapping in miRNA-mediated gene silencing. Genes Dev. 21:2558–2570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eulalio, A., I. Behm-Ansmant, D. Schweizer, and E. Izaurralde. 2007. P-body formation is a consequence, not the cause, of RNA-mediated gene silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:3970–3981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. R. 1997. ‘SCALA.’ Joint CCP4 ESF-EACBM Newsl. 33:22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fenger-Grøn, M., C. Fillman, B. Norrild, and J. Lykke-Andersen. 2005. Multiple processing body factors and the ARE binding protein TTP activate mRNA decapping. Mol. Cell 20:905–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromont-Racine, M., A. E. Mayes, A. Brunet-Simon, J. C. Rain, A. Colley, I. Dix, L. Decourty, N. Joly, F. Ricard, J. D. Beggs, and P. Legrain. 2000. Genome-wide protein interaction screens reveal functional networks involving Sm-like proteins. Yeast 17:95–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, H., P. Fabrizio, V. A. Raker, K. Foulaki, H. Hornig, and R. Lührmann. 1995. snRNP Sm proteins share two evolutionarily conserved sequence motifs which are involved in Sm protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 14:2076–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, L., and C. Sander. 1995. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:478–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambach, C., S. Walke, R. Young, J. M. Avis, E. de la Fortelle, V. A. Raker, R. Lührmann, J. Li, and K. Nagai. 1999. Crystal structures of two Sm protein complexes and their implications for the assembly of the spliceosomal snRNPs. Cell 96:375–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khusial, P., R. Plaag, and G. W. Zieve. 2005. LSm proteins form heptameric rings that bind to RNA via repeating motifs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:522–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilic, T., S. Sanglier, A. van Dorsselaer, and D. Suck. 2006. Oligomerization behavior of the archaeal Sm2-type protein from Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Protein Sci. 15:2310–2317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M., and R. Parker. 2004. Identification of Edc3p as an enhancer of mRNA decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 166:729–739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laskowski, R. A., M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton. 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereo chemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, A. G. W. 1992. ‘MOSFLM.’ Joint CCP4 ESF-EACBM Newsl. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Mura, C., D. Cascio, M. R. Sawaya, and D. S. Eisenberg. 2001. The crystal structure of a heptameric archaeal Sm protein: implications for the eukaryotic snRNP core. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5532–5537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murshudov, G. N., A. A. Vagin, and E. J. Dodson. 1997. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53:240–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murzin, A. G., S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia. 1995. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:536–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otwinowski, Z., and W. Minor. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276:307–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R., and H. Song. 2004. The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R., and U. Sheth. 2007. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol. Cell 25:635–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehwinkel, J., I. Behm-Ansmant, D. Gatfield, and E. Izaurralde. 2005. A crucial role for GW182 and the DCP1:DCP2 decapping complex in miRNA-mediated gene silencing. RNA 11:1640–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, M. A., R. F. Pearson, T. Moller, P. Valentin-Hansen, and R. G. Brennan. 2002. Structures of the pleiotropic translational regulator Hfq and an Hfq-RNA complex: a bacterial Sm-like protein. EMBO J. 21:3546–3556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séraphin, B. 1995. Sm and Sm-like proteins belong to a large family: identification of proteins of the U6 as well as the U1, U2, U4 and U5 snRNPs. EMBO J. 14:2089–2098.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• She, M., C. J. Decker, K. Sundramurthy, Y. Liu, N. Chen, R. Parker, and H. Song. 2004. Crystal structure of Dcp1p and its functional implications in mRNA decapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:249–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• She, M., C. J. Decker, N. Chen, S. Tumati, R. Parker, and H. Song. 2006. Crystal structure and functional analysis of Dcp2p from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:63–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka, K. J., K. Ogawa, M. Takagi, N. Imamoto, K. Matsumoto, and M. Tsujimoto. 2006. RAP55, a cytoplasmic mRNP component, represses translation in Xenopus oocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 281:40096–40106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharun, S., W. He, A. E. Mayes, P. Lennertz, J. D. Beggs, and R. Parker. 2000. Yeast Sm-like proteins function in mRNA decapping and decay. Nature 404:515–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharun, S., and R. Parker. 2001. Targeting an mRNA for decapping: displacement of translation factors and association of the Lsm1p-7p complex on deadenylated yeast mRNAs. Mol. Cell 8:1075–1083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thore, S., C. Mayer, C. Sauter, S. Weeks, and D. Suck. 2003. Crystal structures of the Pyrococcus abyssi Sm core and its complex with RNA. Common features of RNA binding in archaea and eukarya. J. Biol. Chem. 278:1239–1247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Törö, I., S. Thore, C. Mayer, J. Basquin, B. Seraphin, and D. Suck. 2001. RNA binding in an Sm core domain: X-ray structure and functional analysis of an archaeal Sm protein complex. EMBO J. 20:2293–2303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Truffault, V., M. Coles, T. Diercks, K. Abelmann, S. Eberhardt, H. Luttgen, A. Bacher, and H. Kessler. 2001. The solution structure of the N-terminal domain of riboflavin synthase. J. Mol. Biol. 309:949–960.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vonrhein, C., E. Blanc, P. Roversi, and G. Bricogne. 2006. Automated structure solution with autoSHARP. Methods Mol. Biol. 364:215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Vuister, G. W., and A. Bax. 1993. Quantitative J correlation: a new approach for measuring homonuclear three-bond J(HNH.alpha.) coupling constants in 15N-enriched proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:7772–7777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. E., M. Buszczak, and S. Sayles. 2005. Efficient protein trafficking requires trailer hitch, a component of a ribonucleoprotein complex localized to the ER in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 9:675–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilusz, C. J., and J. Wilusz. 2005. Eukaryotic Lsm proteins: lessons from bacteria. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:1031–1036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, W. H., J. H. Yu, T. Gulick, K. D. Bloch, and D. B. Bloch. 2006. RNA-associated protein 55 (RAP55) localizes to mRNA processing bodies and stress granules. RNA 12:547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J. H., W. H. Yang, T. Gulick, K. D. Bloch, and D. B. Bloch. 2005. Ge-1 is a central component of the mammalian cytoplasmic mRNA processing body. RNA 11:1795–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar