Cooperative Roles of Vertebrate Fbh1 and Blm DNA Helicases in Avoidance of Crossovers during Recombination Initiated by Replication Fork Collapse

REFERENCES

• Adachi, N., S. So, and H. Koyama. 2004. Loss of nonhomologous end joining confers camptothecin resistance in DT40 cells. Implications for the repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279:37343–37348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexeev, A., A. Mazin, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2003. Rad54 protein possesses chromatin-remodeling activity stimulated by the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:182–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arakawa, H., D. Lodygin, and J. M. Buerstedde. 2001. Mutant loxP vectors for selectable marker recycle and conditional knock-outs. BMC Biotechnol. 1:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnaudeau, C., C. Lundin, and T. Helleday. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks associated with replication forks are predominantly repaired by homologous recombination involving an exchange mechanism in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 307:1235–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezzubova, O., A. Silbergleit, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, S. Takeda, and J. M. Buerstedde. 1997. Reduced X-ray resistance and homologous recombination frequencies in a RAD54−/− mutant of the chicken DT40 cell line. Cell 89:185–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buerstedde, J. M., C. A. Reynaud, E. H. Humphries, W. Olson, D. L. Ewert, and J. C. Weill. 1990. Light chain gene conversion continues at high rate in an ALV-induced cell line. EMBO J. 9:921–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraverty, R. K., and I. D. Hickson. 1999. Defending genome integrity during DNA replication: a proposed role for RecQ family helicases. Bioessays 21:286–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doe, C. L., and M. C. Whitby. 2004. The involvement of Srs2 in post-replication repair and homologous recombination in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1480–1491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis, N. A., and J. German. 1996. Molecular genetics of Bloom's syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5:1457–1463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujimori, A., S. Tachiiri, E. Sonoda, L. H. Thompson, P. K. Dhar, M. Hiraoka, S. Takeda, Y. Zhang, M. Reth, and M. Takata. 2001. Rad52 partially substitutes for the Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20:5513–5520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima, T., M. Takata, C. Morrison, R. Araki, A. Fujimori, M. Abe, K. Tatsumi, M. Jasin, P. K. Dhar, E. Sonoda, T. Chiba, and S. Takeda. 2001. Genetic analysis of the DNA-dependent protein kinase reveals an inhibitory role of Ku in late S-G2 phase DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44413–44418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickson, I. D. 2003. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, S., K. Yamamoto, M. Ishiai, M. Yamazoe, M. Seki, N. Matsushita, M. Ohzeki, Y. M. Yamashita, H. Arakawa, J. M. Buerstedde, T. Enomoto, S. Takeda, L. H. Thompson, and M. Takata. 2005. Functional relationships of FANCC to homologous recombination, translesion synthesis, and BLM. EMBO J. 24:418–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochegger, H., D. Dejsuphong, T. Fukushima, C. Morrison, E. Sonoda, V. Schreiber, G. Y. Zhao, A. Saberi, M. Masutani, N. Adachi, H. Koyama, G. de Murcia, and S. Takeda. 2006. Parp-1 protects homologous recombination from interference by Ku and ligase IV in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 25:1305–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochegger, H., E. Sonoda, and S. Takeda. 2004. Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: translesion polymerases versus recombinases. Bioessays 26:151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeijmakers, J. H. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura, O., K. Fujita, C. Itoh, S. Takeda, Y. Furuichi, and T. Matsumoto. 2002. Werner and Bloom helicases are involved in DNA repair in a complementary fashion. Oncogene 21:954–963.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., and M. Jasin. 2000. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19:3398–3407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., N. Liu, and M. Jasin. 1999. Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Nature 401:397–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi, K., Y. Taniguchi, A. Hatanaka, E. Sonoda, H. Hochegger, N. Adachi, Y. Matsuzaki, H. Koyama, D. C. van Gent, M. Jasin, and S. Takeda. 2005. Fen-1 facilitates homologous recombination by removing divergent sequences at DNA break ends. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:6948–6955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J., J. H. Kim, S. H. Lee, D. H. Kim, H. Y. Kang, S. H. Bae, Z. Q. Pan, and Y. S. Seo. 2002. The novel human DNA helicase hFBH1 is an F-box protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277:24530–24537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J. H., J. Kim, D. H. Kim, G. H. Ryu, S. H. Bae, and Y. S. Seo. 2004. SCFhFBH1 can act as helicase and E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:2287–2297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindahl, T. 1993. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362:709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and S. C. West. 2004. Happy Hollidays: 40th anniversary of the Holliday junction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:937–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, D., J. Clifford, H. Chiba, and P. Chambon. 1995. Conditional site-specific recombination in mammalian cells using a ligand-dependent chimeric Cre recombinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6991–6995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohaghegh, P., J. K. Karow, R. M. Brosh Jr., V. A. Bohr, and I. D. Hickson. 2001. The Bloom's and Werner's syndrome proteins are DNA structure-specific helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2843–2849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morishita, T., F. Furukawa, C. Sakaguchi, T. Toda, A. M. Carr, H. Iwasaki, and H. Shinagawa. 2005. Role of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe F-Box DNA helicase in processing recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:8074–8083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okada, T., E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, S. Koyoshi, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, M. Takata, O. Ogawa, and S. Takeda. 2002. Involvement of vertebrate polkappa in Rad18-independent postreplication repair of UV damage. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48690–48695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, F., J. Dixon, A. R. Barr, and M. C. Whitby. 2005. The F-Box DNA helicase Fbh1 prevents Rhp51-dependent recombination without mediator proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:8084–8096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petukhova, G., S. Stratton, and P. Sung. 1998. Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature 393:91–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ralf, C., I. D. Hickson, and L. Wu. 2006. The Bloom's syndrome helicase can promote the regression of a model replication fork. J. Biol. Chem. 281:22839–22846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh-Gohari, N., H. E. Bryant, N. Schultz, K. M. Parker, T. N. Cassel, and T. Helleday. 2005. Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7158–7169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogo, J. M., M. Lopes, and M. Foiani. 2002. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297:599–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda, E., M. S. Sasaki, J. M. Buerstedde, O. Bezzubova, A. Shinohara, H. Ogawa, M. Takata, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, and S. Takeda. 1998. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J. 17:598–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda, E., M. S. Sasaki, C. Morrison, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, M. Takata, and S. Takeda. 1999. Sister chromatid exchanges are mediated by homologous recombination in vertebrate cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5166–5169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strumberg, D., A. A. Pilon, M. Smith, R. Hickey, L. Malkas, and Y. Pommier. 2000. Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5′-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3977–3987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J. E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:209–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takata, M., M. S. Sasaki, E. Sonoda, C. Morrison, M. Hashimoto, H. Utsumi, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, A. Shinohara, and S. Takeda. 1998. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17:5497–5508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brabant, A. J., T. Ye, M. Sanz, I. J. German, N. A. Ellis, and W. K. Holloman. 2000. Binding and melting of D-loops by the Bloom syndrome helicase. Biochemistry 39:14617–14625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., M. Seki, Y. Narita, E. Sonoda, S. Takeda, K. Yamada, T. Masuko, T. Katada, and T. Enomoto. 2000. Possible association of BLM in decreasing DNA double strand breaks during DNA replication. EMBO J. 19:3428–3435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, L., and I. D. Hickson. 2003. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426:870–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., and I. D. Hickson. 2006. DNA helicases required for homologous recombination and repair of damaged replication forks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40:279–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita, Y. M., T. Okada, T. Matsusaka, E. Sonoda, G. Y. Zhao, K. Araki, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, and S. Takeda. 2002. RAD18 and RAD54 cooperatively contribute to maintenance of genomic stability in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 21:5558–5566.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar