Novel Checkpoint Pathway Organization Promotes Genome Stability in Stationary-Phase Yeast Cells

REFERENCES

• Jin K, Ewton DZ, Park S, Hu J, Friedman E. 2009. Mirk regulates the exit of colon cancer cells from quiescence. J. Biol. Chem. 284:22916–22925.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, Vogel S, Crowley D, Bronson RT, Jacks T. 2005. Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 121:823–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda T, Arai F, Hirao A. 2005. Hematopoietic stem cells and their niche. Trends Immunol. 26:426–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Petsko GA, Johnston GC, Ringe D, Singer RA, Werner-Washburne M. 2004. “Sleeping beauty”: quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:187–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner-Washburne M, Braun E, Johnston GC, Singer RA. 1993. Stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 57:383–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly MK, Alver B, Kirkpatrick DT. 2011. Minisatellite alterations in ZRT1 mutants occur via RAD52-dependent and RAD52-independent mechanisms in quiescent stationary phase yeast cells. DNA Repair 10:556–566.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly MK, Jauert PA, Jensen LE, Chan CL, Truong CS, Kirkpatrick DT. 2007. Zinc regulates the stability of repetitive minisatellite DNA tracts during stationary phase. Genetics 177:2469–2479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly MK, Brosnan L, Jauert PA, Dunham MJ, Kirkpatrick DT. 2012. Multiple pathways regulate minisatellite stability during stationary phase in yeast. G3 2:1185–1195.
   Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2009. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair 8:1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam CD, Jaehnig EJ, Kolodner RD. 2009. Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 8:974–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JF, Carr AM, Elledge SJ. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:958–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emili A. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor ML, Li JM, Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. 2009. Mrc1 phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress is required for Mec1 accumulation at the stalled fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:12765–12770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Zhou H. 2009. Reconstitution of Rad53 activation by Mec1 through adaptor protein Mrc1. J. Biol. Chem. 284:18593–18604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17:1755–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhese MP, Clerici M, Lucchini G. 2003. The S-phase checkpoint and its regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 532:41–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenwell PW, Kronmal SL, Porter SE, Gassenhuber J, Obermaier B, Petes TD. 1995. TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow DM, Tagle DA, Shiloh Y, Collins FS, Hieter P. 1995. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82:831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. 1994. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8:652–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. 1999. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1136–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciotti V, Lucchini G, Plevani P, Longhese MP. 1998. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 17:4199–4209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majka J, Burgers PM. 2003. Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2249–2254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navadgi-Patil VM, Burgers PM. 2009. A tale of two tails: activation of DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1/ATR by the 9-1-1 clamp and by Dpb11/TopBP1. DNA Repair 8:996–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge SJ. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew DJ, Burke DJ. 2003. The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37:251–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66:507–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Murray AW. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, Hwang ES, Amon A, Murray AW. 1998. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279:1041–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar V, Jingjing L, Patel N, Kaur N, Doetsch PW, Shadel GS, Zhang H, Siede W. 2009. Checkpoint kinase phosphorylation in response to endogenous oxidative DNA damage in repair-deficient stationary-phase Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mech. Ageing Dev. 130:501–508.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong AH, Boone C. 2006. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 313:171–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, Page N, Robinson M, Raghibizadeh S, Hogue CW, Bussey H, Andrews B, Tyers M, Boone C. 2001. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364–2368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie C, Fink G. 1991. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology, vol 194. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jauert PA, Edmiston SN, Conway K, Kirkpatrick DT. 2002. RAD1 controls the meiotic expansion of the human HRAS1 minisatellite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:953–964.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raveendranathan M, Chattopadhyay S, Bolon YT, Haworth J, Clarke DJ, Bielinsky AK. 2006. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25:3627–3639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang KN, Symington LS. 1995. Suppressors of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae pkc1 mutation identify alleles of the phosphatase gene PTC1 and of a novel gene encoding a putative basic leucine zipper protein. Genetics 141:1275–1285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeke JD, LaCroute F, Fink GR. 1984. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:345–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Umezu K, Sugawara N, Chen C, Haber JE, Kolodner RD. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148:989–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Vizeacoumar FJ, Bahr S, Li J, Warringer J, Vizeacoumar FS, Min R, Vandersluis B, Bellay J, Devit M, Fleming JA, Stephens A, Haase J, Lin ZY, Baryshnikova A, Lu H, Yan Z, Jin K, Barker S, Datti A, Giaever G, Nislow C, Bulawa C, Myers CL, Costanzo M, Gingras AC, Zhang Z, Blomberg A, Bloom K, Andrews B, Boone C. 2011. Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat. Biotechnol. 29:361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggins S, Murray AW. 2001. The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15:3118–3129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsky BA, Kung C, Shokat KM, Biggins S. 2006. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner J, Carbon J. 1991. A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64:717–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunnikov AV, Kingsbury J, Koshland D. 1995. CEP3 encodes a centromere protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 128:749–760.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullmann G, Fien K, Kobayashi R, Stillman B. 1995. Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4661–4671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2006. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. Exp. Cell Res. 312:2654–2659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen C, Buttner S, Aragon AD, Thomas JA, Meirelles O, Jaetao JE, Benn D, Ruby SW, Veenhuis M, Madeo F, Werner-Washburne M. 2006. Isolation of quiescent and nonquiescent cells from yeast stationary-phase cultures. J. Cell Biol. 174:89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon AD, Rodriguez AL, Meirelles O, Roy S, Davidson GS, Tapia PH, Allen C, Joe R, Benn D, Werner-Washburne M. 2008. Characterization of differentiated quiescent and nonquiescent cells in yeast stationary-phase cultures. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:1271–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkko JM, Koivuranta KT, Miinalainen IJ, Yagi AI, Schmitz W, Kastaniotis AJ, Airenne TT, Gurvitz A, Hiltunen KJ. 2001. Candida tropicalis Etr1p and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ybr026p (Mrf1′p), 2-enoyl thioester reductases essential for mitochondrial respiratory competence. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:6243–6253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez NS, Pearce DA, Cardillo TS, Uribe S, Sherman F. 2001. Requirements of Cyc2p and the porin, Por1p, for ionic stability and mitochondrial integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 392:326–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Kao HI, Bambara RA. 2004. Flap endonuclease 1: a central component of DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:589–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti H, Raths S, Crausaz F, Riezman H. 1994. The END3 gene encodes a protein that is required for the internalization step of endocytosis and for actin cytoskeleton organization in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:1023–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin DE, Fields FO, Kunisawa R, Bishop JM, Thorner J. 1990. A candidate protein kinase C gene, PKC1, is required for the S. cerevisiae cell cycle. Cell 62:213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager AR. 2006. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:4126–4137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantake N, Sugiyama T, Kolodner RD, Kowalczykowski SC. 2003. The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23410–23417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soustelle C, Vedel M, Kolodner R, Nicolas A. 2002. Replication protein A is required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161:535–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bando M, Katou Y, Komata M, Tanaka H, Itoh T, Sutani T, Shirahige K. 2009. Csm3, Tof1, and Mrc1 form a heterotrimeric mediator complex that associates with DNA replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 284:34355–34365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, Sugimoto K, Shirahige K. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424:1078–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohrmann PR, Sclafani RA. 2006. Novel role for checkpoint Rad53 protein kinase in the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174:87–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunjan A, Verreault A. 2003. A Rad53 kinase-dependent surveillance mechanism that regulates histone protein levels in S. cerevisiae. Cell 115:537–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Morgan A, Brodsky L, Ronin Y, Nevo E, Korol A, Kashi Y. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of DNA turnover and gene expression in stationary-phase Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 156:1758–1771.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokoska RJ, Stefanovic L, Tran HT, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, Petes TD. 1998. Destabilization of yeast micro- and minisatellite DNA sequences by mutations affecting a nuclease involved in Okazaki fragment processing (rad27) and DNA polymerase delta (pol3-t). Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2779–2788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes J, Ribeyre C, Nicolas A. 2006. Complex minisatellite rearrangements generated in the total or partial absence of Rad27/hFEN1 activity occur in a single generation and are Rad51 and Rad52 dependent. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:6675–6689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gourlay CW, Ayscough KR. 2006. Actin-induced hyperactivation of the Ras signaling pathway leads to apoptosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:6487–6501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghnazari E, Heyer WD. 2004. The Hog1 MAP kinase pathway and the Mec1 DNA damage checkpoint pathway independently control the cellular responses to hydrogen peroxide. DNA Repair 3:769–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy C, Mann C, Marsolier MC. 2001. Silent repair accounts for cell cycle specificity in the signaling of oxidative DNA lesions. EMBO J. 20:2896–2906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pujol N, Bonet C, Vilella F, Petkova MI, Mozo-Villarias A, de la Torre-Ruiz MA. 2009. Two proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Pfy1 and Pkc1, play a dual role in activating actin polymerization and in increasing cell viability in the adaptive response to oxidative stress. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:1196–1207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson AL, Chen R, Loeb LA. 1998. Induction of microsatellite instability by oxidative DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:12468–12473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC. 2007. Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat. Rev. 8:798–812.
   Google Scholar
• McCulley JL, Petes TD. 2010. Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:11465–11470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McSherry TD, Kitazono AA, Javaheri A, Kron SJ, Mueller PR. 2007. Non-catalytic function for ATR in the checkpoint response. Cell Cycle 6:2019–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar