Xenopus TFIIIA Gene Transcription Is Dependent on cis-Element Positioning and Chromatin Structure

REFERENCES

• Armstrong, J. A., and B. M. Emerson 1996. NF-E2 disrupts chromatin structure at human β-globin locus control region hypersensitive site 2 in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 5634–5644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carthew, R. W., L. A. Chodosh, and P. A. Sharp 1987. The major late transcription factor binds to and activates the mouse metallothionein I promoter. Genes Dev. 1: 973–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodosh, L. A., R. W. Carthew, J. W. Morgan, G. R. Crabtree, and P. A. Sharp 1987. An adenovirus major late transcription factor activates the γ-fibrinogen promoter. Science 238: 684–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelke, D. R., S. Y. Ng, B. S. Shastry, and R. G. Roeder 1980. Specific interaction of a purified transcription factor with an internal control region of 5S RNA genes. Cell 19: 717–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedor, M. J., L. F. Lue, and R. D. Kornberg 1988. Statistical positioning of nucleosomes by specific protein binding to an upstream activating sequence in yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 204: 109–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ginsberg, A. M., B. O. King, and R. G. Roeder 1984. Xenopus 5S gene transcription factor, TFIIIA: characterization of a cDNA clone and measurement of RNA levels throughout development. Cell 39: 479–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, P. D., M. Sawadogo, and R. G. Roeder 1990. The adenovirus major late transcription factor USF is a member of the helix-loop-helix group of regulatory proteins and binds to DNA as a dimer. Genes Dev. 4: 1730–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. K., and W. L. Taylor 1989. Transcription factor IIIA gene expression in Xenopus oocytes utilizes a transcription factor similar to the major late transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 5003–5011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honda, B. M., and R. G. Roeder 1980. Association of a 5S gene transcription factor with 5S RNA and altered levels of the factor during cell differentiation. Cell 22: 119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulen, H., P. Pognonec, P. D. Gregor, and R. G. Roeder 1991. The Xenopus B1 factor is closely related to the mammalian activator USF and is implicated in the developmental regulation of TFIIIA gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 412–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landsberger, N., and A. P. Wolffe 1995. Role of chromatin and Xenopus laevis heat shock transcription factor in the regulation of transcription from the X. laevis hsp70 promoter in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 6013–6024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu, Q., L. L. Wallrath, and S. C. R. Elgin 1994. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation. J. Cell. Biochem. 55: 83–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu, Q., L. L. Wallrath, and S. C. R. Elgin 1995. The role of a positioned nucleosome at the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 14: 4738–4746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marin, M., A. Karis, P. Visser, F. Grosveld, and S. Philipsen 1997. Transcription factor Sp1 is essential for early embryonic development but dispensable for cell growth and differentiation. Cell 89: 619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y., and L. J. Korn 1988. Upstream sequences required for transcription of the TFIIIA gene in Xenopus oocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 3801–3813.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxam, A., and W. Gilbert 1980. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 65: 499–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPherson, C. E., E. Shim, D. S. Friedman, and K. S. Zaret 1993. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell 75: 387–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J., A. D. McLachlan, and A. Klug 1985. Repetitive zinc-binding domains in the protein transcription factor TFIIIA from Xenopus oocytes. EMBO J. 4: 1609–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, P. R., S. J. Salser, and B. Wold 1988. Constitutive and metal-inducible protein:DNA interactions at the mouse metallothionein I promoter examined by in vivo and in vitro footprinting. Genes Dev. 2: 412–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pazin, M., R. T. Kamakaka, and J. T. Kadonaga 1994. ATP-dependent nucleosome reconfiguration and transcriptional activation from preassembled chromatin templates. Science 266: 2007–2011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pazin, M. J., P. L. Sheridan, K. Cannon, Z. Cao, J. G. Keck, J. T. Kadonaga, and K. A. Jones 1996. NF-κB-mediated chromatin reconfiguration and transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 enhancer in vitro. Genes Dev. 10: 37–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pazin, M. J., P. Bhargava, E. P. Geiduschek, and J. T. Kadonaga 1997. Nucleosome mobility and the maintenance of nucleosome positioning. Science 276: 809–812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelham, H. R. B., and D. D. Brown 1980. A specific transcription factor that can bind either the 5S RNA gene or 5S RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4170–4174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penberthy, W. T., D. Griffin, R. K. Hall, and W. L. Taylor. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Peritz, L. N., E. J. Fodor, D. W. Silversides, P. A. Cattini, J. D. Baxter, and N. L. Eberhardt 1988. The human growth hormone gene contains both positive and negative control elements. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 5005–5007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman, T., and O. Wrange 1991. Inhibition of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes correlates with the derepression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 5259–5265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfaff, S. L., R. K. Hall, G. C. Hart, and W. L. Taylor 1991. Regulation of the Xenopus laevis transcription factor IIIA gene during oogenesis and early embryogenesis: negative elements repress the O-TFIIIA promoter in embryonic cells. Dev. Biol. 145: 241–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfaff, S. L., and W. L. Taylor. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Pondel, M. D., S. Murphy, L. Pearson, C. Craddock, and N. J. Proudfoot 1995. Sp1 functions in a chromatin dependent manner to augment human α-globin promoter activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7237–7241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth, S. Y., M. Shimizu, L. Johnson, M. Grunstein, and R. T. Simpson 1992. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast α2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev. 6: 411–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schild, C., F. Claret, W. Wahli, and A. P. Wolffe 1993. A nucleosome-dependent static loop potentiates estrogen-regulated transcription from the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 12: 423–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scotto, K. W., H. Kaulen, and R. G. Roeder 1989. Positive and negative regulation of the gene for transcription factor IIIA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Genes Dev. 3: 651–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal, S. N., D. L. Davis, and J. B. E. Burch 1991. Mutational studies reveal a complex set of positive and negative control elements within the chicken vitellogenin II promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 2704–2717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall, J., T. Matsui, and R. G. Roeder 1980. Multiple factors are required for the accurate transcription of purified genes by RNA polymerase III. J. Biol. Chem. 255: 11986–11991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, M., S. Y. Roth, C. Szent-Gyorgi, and R. T. Simpson 1991. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the α2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 10: 3033–3041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W., I. J. Jackson, N. Siegel, A. Kumar, and D. D. Brown 1986. The developmental expression of the gene for TFIIIA in Xenopus laevis. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 6185–6195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. H., and S. C. R. Elgin 1988. Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 7: 2191–2201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsukiyama, T., P. B. Becker, and C. Wu 1994. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367: 525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso, J. Y., D. J. Van Den Berg, and L. J. Korn 1986. Structure of the gene for Xenopus transcription factor IIIA. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 2187–2200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, G., P. D. Varga-Weisz, R. L. Sandaltzopoulos, and P. B. Becker 1995. Chromatin remodeling by GAGA factor and heat shock factor at the hypersensitive Drosophila hsp26 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 14: 1727–1736.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P. 1992. Chromatin structure and function. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
   Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., R. G. Roeder, and R. E. Kingston 1990. An upstream transcription factor, USF (MLTF), facilitates the formation of preinitiation complexes during in vitro chromatin assembly. EMBO J. 9: 1299–1308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yenidunya, A., C. Davey, D. Clark, G. Felsenfeld, and J. Allan 1994. Nucleosome positioning on chicken and human globin gene promoters in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 237: 401–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwartkruis, F., T. Hoeijmakers, J. Deschamps, and F. Meijlink 1991. Characterization of the murine Hox-2.3 promoter: involvement of the transcription factor USF (MLTF). Mech. Dev. 33: 179–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar