Temporal Recruitment of the mSin3A-Histone Deacetylase Corepressor Complex to the ETS Domain Transcription Factor Elk-1

REFERENCES

• Alberts, A. S., O. Geneste, and R. Treisman. 1998. Activation of SRF-regulated chromosomal templates by Rho-family GTPases requires a signal that also induces H4 hyperacetylation. Cell 92:475–487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayer, D. E.. 1999. Histone deacetylases: transcriptional repression with SINers and NuRDs. Trends Cell Biol. 9:193–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boshart, M., M. Kluppel, A. Schmidt, G. Schutz, and B. Luckow. 1992. Reporter constructs with low background activity utilizing the CAT gene. Gene 110:129–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer, T. G., M. E. Martin, E. Lees, R. P. Ricciardi, and A. J. Berk. 1999. Mammalian Srb/mediator complex is targeted by adenovirus E1A protein. Nature 399:276–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, A., and T. Kouzarides. 1999. Retinoblastoma protein meets chromatin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:142–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, L. A., A. Amores, T. F. Schilling, T. Jowett, J. L. Baert, Y. de Launoit, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1998. Molecular characterization of the zebrafish PEA3 ETS-domain transcription factor. Oncogene 17:93–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cahill, M. A., R. Janknecht, and A. Nordheim. 1995. Signal uptake by the c-fos serum response element. Inducible gene expression.. P. A. Bauerle. 39–72. Birkhauser, Boston, Mass
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, P., K. G. Tanner, W. L. Cheung, P. Sassone-Corsi, J. M. Denu, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Synergistic coupling of histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation in response to epidermal growth factor stimulation. Mol. Cell 5:905–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, I. G.. 1994. Repression versus activation in the control of gene transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19:38–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criqui-Filipe, P., C. Ducret, S. M. Maira, and B. Wasylyk. 1999. Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation. EMBO J. 18:3392–3403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalgleish, P., and A. D. Sharrocks. 2000. The mechanism of complex formation between Fli-1 and SRF transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:560–569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eilers, A. L., A. N. Billin, J. Liu, and D. E. Ayer. 1999. A 13-amino-acid amphipathic alpha-helix is required for the functional interaction between the transcriptional repressor Mad1 and mSin3A. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32750–32756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenrick, R., J. M. Amann, B. Lutterbach, L. Wang, J. J. Westendorf, J. R. Downing, and S. W. Hiebert. 1999. Both TEL and AML-1 contribute repression domains to the t(12;21) fusion protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6566–6574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gille, H., M. Kortenjann, O. Thomae, C. Moomaw, C. Slaughter, M. H. Cobb, and P. E. Shaw. 1995. ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk-1-mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. EMBO J. 14:951–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovane, A., A. Pintzas, S. M. Maira, P. Sobieszczuk, and B. Wasylyk. 1994. Net, a new ets transcription factor that is activated by Ras. Genes Dev. 8:1502–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovane, A., P. Sobieszczuk, A. Ayadi, S. M. Maira, and B. Wasylyk. 1997. Net-b, a Ras-insensitive factor that forms ternary complexes with serum response factor on the serum response element of the fos promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5667–5678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbour, J. W., R. X. Luo, A. Dei Santi, A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean. 1999. Cdk phosphorylation triggers sequential intramolecular interactions that progressively block Rb functions as cells move through G1. Cell 98:859–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herschbach, B. M., and A. D. Johnson. 1993. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9:479–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill, C. S., and R. Treisman. 1995. Transcriptional regulation by extracellular signals: mechanisms and specificity. Cell 80:199–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. S., J. Wynne, and R. Treisman. 1995. The Rho family GTPases RhoA, Rac1, and CDC42Hs regulate transcriptional activation by SRF. Cell 81:1159–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D., D. Glossip, H. Xing, A. J. Muslin, and K. Kornfeld. 1999. Multiple docking sites on substrate proteins form a modular system that mediates recognition by ERK MAP kinase. Genes Dev. 13:163–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janknecht, R., R. Zinck, W. H. Ernst, and A. Nordheim. 1994. Functional dissection of the transcription factor Elk-1. Oncogene 9:1273–1278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janknecht, R., W. H. Ernst, and A. Nordheim. 1995. SAP1a is a nuclear target of signaling cascades involving ERKs. Oncogene 10:1209–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janknecht, R., and A. Nordheim. 1996. MAP kinase-dependent transcriptional coactivation by Elk-1 and its cofactor CBP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 228:831–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, F. E., and R. Prywes. 1994. Two pathways for serum regulation of the c-fos serum response element require specific sequence elements and a minimal domain of serum response factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5920–5928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, C. A., and B. M. Turner. 1999. Histone deacetylases: complex transducers of nuclear signals. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koipally, J., A. Renold, J. Kim, and K. Georgopoulos. 1999. Repression by Ikaros and Aiolos is mediated through histone deacetylase complexes. EMBO J. 18:3090–3100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kouzarides, T.. 1999. Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laherty, C. D., W. M. Yang, J. M. Sun, J. R. Davie, E. Seto, and R. N. Eisenman. 1997. Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate mad transcriptional repression. Cell 89:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, R. G., C. Carron, C. Oury, P. Gardellin, O. Bernard, and J. Ghysdael. 1999. TEL is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 274:30132–30138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maira, S.-M., J.-M. Wurtz, and B. Wasylyk. 1996. Net (ERP/SAP2), one of the Ras-inducible TCFs, has a novel inhibitory domain with resemblance to the helix-loop-helix motif. EMBO J. 15:5849–5865.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marais, R., J. Wynne, and R. Treisman. 1993. The SRF accessory protein Elk-1 contains a growth factor-regulated transcriptional activation domain. Cell 73:381–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., J. Ahn, K. K. Walker, W. H. Hoffman, R. M. Evans, A. J. Levine, and D. L. George. 1999. Transcriptional repression by wild-type p53 utilizes histone deacetylases, mediated by interaction with mSin3a. Genes Dev. 13:2490–2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo, J. R., B. Mellstrom, J. Auwerx, F. Mollinedo, and P. Sassone-Corsi. 1990. Unusual c-fos induction upon chromaffin PC12 differentiation by sodium butyrate: loss of fos autoregulatory function. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3605–3610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pazin, M. J., and J. T. Kadonaga. 1997. What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription?. Cell 89:325–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. A., A. E. Rogers, and R. Treisman. 1995. Comparative analysis of the ternary complex factors Elk-1, SAP-1a and SAP-2 (ERP/NET). EMBO J. 14:2589–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A., F. A. Gonzalez, S. Gupta, D. L. Raden, and R. J. Davis. 1992. Signal transduction within the nucleus by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 267:24796–24804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, P., and A. D. Sharrocks. 1994. The transcription factors Elk-1 and serum response factor interact by direct protein-protein contacts mediated by a short region of Elk-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3283–3291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, P., and A. D. Sharrocks. 1995. The ETS-domain transcription factors Elk-1 and SAP-1 exhibit differential DNA binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4698–4706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, P., L. Bisset, J. Lakey, J. P. Waltho, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1995. Characterization of the Elk-1 ETS DNA-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 270:5805–5811.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, R.. 1992. The serum response element. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17:423–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, R.. 1994. Ternary complex factors: growth regulated transcriptional activators. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4:96–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, R.. 1996. Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:205–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wotton, D., R. S. Lo, S. Lee, and J. Massague. 1999. A Smad transcriptional corepressor. Cell 97:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1999. Coactivator and corepressor complexes in nuclear receptor function. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-H., P. R. Yates, A. J. Whitmarsh, R. J. Davis, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1998. The Elk-1 ETS-domain transcription factor contains a MAP kinase targeting motif. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:710–720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, S.-H., A. J. Whitmarsh, R. J. Davis, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1998. Differential targeting of MAP kinases to the ETS-domain transcription factor Elk-1. EMBO J. 17:1740–1749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-H., P. R. Yates, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1999. The ETS-domain transcription factors: lessons from the TCF subfamily. Gene Ther. Mol. Biol. 3:355–371.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-H., P. Shore, N. Willingham, J. H. Lakey, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1999. The mechanism of phosphorylation-inducible activation of the ETS-domain transcription factor Elk-1. EMBO J. 18:5666–5674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, P. R., G. T. Atherton, R. W. Deed, J. D. Norton, and A. D. Sharrocks. 1999. Id helix-loop-helix proteins inhibit nucleoprotein complex formation by the TCF ETS-domain transcription factors. EMBO J. 18:968–976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar