Interactions of the Mcm1 MADS Box Protein with Cofactors That Regulate Mating in Yeast

REFERENCES

• Acton, T. B., J. Mead, A. M. Steiner, and A. K. Vershon. 2000. Scanning mutagenesis of Mcm1: residues required for DNA binding, DNA bending, and transcriptional activation by a MADS-box protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammerer, G. 1990. Identification, purification, and cloning of a polypeptide (PRTF/GRM) that binds to mating-specific promoter elements in yeast. Genes Dev. 4: 299–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baur, M., R. K. Esch, and B. Errede. 1997. Cooperative binding interactions required for function of the Ty1 sterile responsive element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 4330–4337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bender, A., and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1987. MATα1 protein, a yeast transcription activator, binds synergistically with a second protein to a set of cell-type-specific genes. Cell 50: 681–691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boeke, J. D., J. Trueheart, G. Natsoulis, and G. R. Fink. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 154: 164–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn, L., J.-J. Hwang-Shum, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1992. The N-terminal 96 residues of MCM1, a regulator of cell type-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are sufficient for DNA binding, transcription activation, and interaction with α1 Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 3563–3572.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, L., and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1994. MCM1 point mutants deficient in expression of α-specific genes: residues important for interaction with α1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 2534–2544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, R. K., and C. A. Otte. 1982. Isolation and genetic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by a factor and α factor pheromones. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2: 11–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christ, C., and B. K. Tye. 1991. Functional domains of the yeast transcription/replication factor MCM1. Genes Dev. 5: 751–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan, J. W., C. Kirkman, and S. Fields. 1989. The yeast STE12 protein binds to the DNA sequence mediating pheromone induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 5703–5707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubois, E., and F. Messenguy. 1991. In vitro studies of the binding of the ARGR proteins to the ARG5,6 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 2162–2168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Errede, B., and G. Ammerer. 1989. STE12, a protein involved in cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast, is part of protein-DNA complexes. Genes Dev. 3: 1349–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, S., and I. Herskowitz. 1985. The yeast STE12 product is required for expression of two sets of cell-type specific genes. Cell 42: 923–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groisman, R., H. Masutani, M. P. Leibovitch, P. Robin, I. Soudant, D. Trouche, and A. Harel-Bellan. 1996. Physical interaction between the mitogen-responsive serum response factor and myogenic basic-helix-loop-helix proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 5258–5264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagen, D. C., L. Bruhn, C. A. Westby, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1993. Transcription of α-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: DNA sequence requirements for activity of the coregulator α1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 6866–6875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herskowitz, I., J. Rine, and J. Strathern. 1992. Mating-type determination and mating-type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenhorst, P. C., M. E. Bose, M. R. Mielke, U. Muller, and C. A. Fox. 2000. Forkhead genes in transcriptional silencing, cell morphology and the cell cycle. Overlapping and distinct functions for FKH1 and FKH2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 154: 1533–1548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hung, W., K. A. Olson, A. Breitkreutz, and I. Sadowski. 1997. Characterization of the basal and pheromone-stimulated phosphorylation states of Ste12p. Eur. J. Biochem. 245: 241–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang-Shum, J. J., D. C. Hagen, E. E. Jarvis, C. A. Westby, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1991. Relative contributions of MCM1 and STE12 to transcriptional activation of a- and α-specific genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 227: 197–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarvis, E. E., K. L. Clark, and G. F. Sprague. 1989. The yeast transcription activator PRTF, a homolog of the mammalian serum response factor, is encoded by the MCM1 gene. Genes Dev. 3: 936–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, M. C., B. P. Hogan, and A. K. Vershon. 1997. Homeodomain-DNA interactions of the Pho2 protein are promoter-dependent. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4730–4739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keleher, C. A., C. Goutte, and A. D. Johnson. 1988. The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell 53: 927–936.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keleher, C. A., S. Passmore, and A. D. Johnson. 1989. Yeast repressor α2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 5228–5230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koranda, M., A. Schleiffer, L. Endler, and G. Ammerer. 2000. Forkhead-like transcription factors recruit Ndd1 to the chromatin of G2/M-specific promoters. Nature 406: 94–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, R., D. M. Reynolds, A. Shevchenko, S. D. Goldstone, and S. Dalton. 2000. Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase. Curr. Biol. 10: 896–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo, M. H., E. T. Nadeau, and E. J. Grayhack. 1997. Multiple phosphorylated forms of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm1 protein include an isoform induced in response to high salt concentrations. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 819–832.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lydall, D., G. Ammerer, and K. Nasmyth. 1991. A new role for MCM1 in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 transcription. Genes Dev. 5: 2405–2419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mead, J., H. Zhong, T. B. Acton, and A. K. Vershon. 1996. The yeast α2 and Mcm1 proteins interact through a region similar to a motif found in homeodomain proteins of higher eukaryotes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 2135–2143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molkentin, J. D., B. L. Black, J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1995. Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell 83: 1125–1136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molkentin, J. D., and E. N. Olson. 1996. Combinatorial control of muscle development by basic helix-loop-helix and MADS-box transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 9366–9373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehlen, L. J., J. D. McKinney, and F. R. Cross. 1996. Ste12 and Mcm1 regulate cell cycle-dependent transcription of FAR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 2830–2837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Passmore, S., R. Elble, and B. K. Tye. 1989. A protein involved in minichromosome maintenance in yeast binds a transcriptional enhancer conserved in eukaryotes. Genes Dev. 3: 921–935.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Passmore, S., G. T. Maine, R. Elble, C. Christ, and B. K. Tye. 1988. Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein involved in plasmid maintenance is necessary for mating of MATα cells. J. Mol. Biol. 204: 593–606.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellegrini, L., S. Tan, and T. J. Richmond. 1995. Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA. Nature 376: 490–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. A., A. E. Rogers, and R. Treisman. 1995. Comparative analysis of the ternary complex factors Elk-1, SAP-1a and SAP-2 (ERP/NET). EMBO J. 14: 2589–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primig, M., H. Winkler, and G. Ammerer. 1991. The DNA binding and oligomerization domain of MCM1 is sufficient for its interaction with other regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 10: 4209–4218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechmann, J. L., B. A. Krizek, and E. M. Meyerowitz. 1996. Dimerization specificity of Arabidopsis MADS domain homeotic proteins APETALA1, APETALA3, PISTILLATA, and AGAMOUS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 4793–4798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechmann, J. L., and E. M. Meyerowitz. 1997. MADS domain proteins in plant development. Biol. Chem. 378: 1079–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santelli, E., and T. J. Richmond. 2000. Crystal structure of MEF2A core bound to DNA at 1.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 297: 437–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, P., and A. D. Sharrocks. 1995. The MADS-box family of transcription factors. Eur. J. Biochem. 229: 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song, D., J. W. Dolan, Y. L. Yuan, and S. Fields. 1991. Pheromone-dependent phosphorylation of the yeast STE12 protein correlates with transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 5: 741–750.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sprague, G. F., Jr. 1991. Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 194: 77–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan, S., G. Ammerer, and T. J. Richmond. 1988. Interactions of purified transcription factors: binding of yeast MATα1 and PRTF to cell type-specific, upstream activating sequences. EMBO J. 7: 4255–4264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan, S., and T. J. Richmond. 1998. Crystal structure of the yeast MATα2/MCM1/DNA ternary complex. Nature 391: 660–666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan, S., and T. J. Richmond. 1990. DNA binding-induced conformational change of the yeast transcriptional activator PRTF. Cell 62: 367–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, R., R. Marais, and J. Wynne. 1992. Spatial flexibility in ternary complexes between SRF and its accessory proteins. EMBO J. 11: 4631–4640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vershon, A. K., Y. Jin, and A. D. Johnson. 1995. A homeo domain protein lacking specific side chains of helix 3 can still bind DNA and direct transcriptional repression. Genes Dev. 9: 182–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vershon, A. K., and A. D. Johnson. 1993. A short, disordered protein region mediates interactions between the homeodomain of the yeast α2 protein and the MCM1 protein. Cell 72: 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, H., R. McCord, and A. K. Vershon. 1999. Identification of target sites of the α2-Mcm1 repressor complex in the yeast genome. Genome Res. 9: 1040–1047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhong, H., and A. K. Vershon. 1997. The yeast homeodomain protein MATα2 shows extended DNA binding specificity in complex with Mcm1. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 8402–8409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar