Developmentally Regulated Recruitment of Transcription Factors and Chromatin Modification Activities to Chicken Lysozyme cis-Regulatory Elements In Vivo

REFERENCES

• Ahne, B., and W. H. Strätling. 1994. Characterization of a myeloid-specific enhancer of the chicken lysozyme gene. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 17794–17801.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alevizopoulos, A., Y. Dusserre, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, T. von der Weid, W. Wahli, and N. Mermod. 1995. A proline-rich TGF-beta-responsive transcriptional activator interacts with histone H3. Genes Dev. 9: 3051–3066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altschmied, J., M. Müller, S. Baniahmad, S. Steiner, and R. Renkawitz. 1989. Cooperative interaction of chicken lysozyme enhancer subdomains partially overlapping with a steroid receptor binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 4975–4991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniahmad, A., C. Steiner, A. C. Kohne, and R. Renkawitz. 1990. Modular structure of a chicken lysozyme silencer: involvement of an unusual thyroid hormone receptor binding site. Cell 61: 505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. C., A. G. West, and G. Felsenfeld. 1999. The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 98: 387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beug, H., A. V. Kirchbach, G. Düderlein, J.-F. Conscience, and T. Graf. 1979. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell 18: 375–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, A. 2002. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16: 6–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, P., Q. Li, and O. Wrange. 1996. The affinity of nuclear factor I for its DNA site is drastically reduced by nucleosome organization irrespective of its rotational or translational position. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 153–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonifer, C., F. Bosch, N. Faust, A. Schuhmann, and A. E. Sippel. 1994. Evolution of gene regulation as revealed by differential regulation of the chicken lysozyme transgene and the endogenous mouse lysozyme gene in mouse macrophages. Eur. J. Biochem. 226: 227–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonifer, C., U. Jägle, and M. C. Huber. 1997. The chicken lysozyme locus as a paradigm for the complex regulation of eucaryotic gene loci. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 26075–26078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borgmeyer, U., J. Nowock, and A. E. Sippel. 1984. The TGGCA-binding protein: a eukaryotic nuclear protein recognizing a symmetrical sequence in double stranded linear DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 4295–4311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brightbill, H. D., S. E. Plevy, R. L. Modlin, and S. T. Smale. 2000. A prominent role for Sp1 during lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of the IL-10 promoter in macrophages. J. Immunol. 164: 1940–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D., L. Chakalova, C. S. Osborne, Y. F. Dai, and P. Fraser. 2002. Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo. Nat. Genet. 32: 623–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberharter, A., and P. B. Becker. 2002. Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin: second in review series on chromatin dynamics EMBO Rep. 3: 224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, N., C. Bonifer, and A. E. Sippel. 2000. Differential activity of the −2.7 kb chicken lysozyme enhancer in macrophages of different ontogenic origins is regulated by C/EBP and PU.1 transcription factors. DNA Cell Biol. 18: 631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E. C., K. M. Downs, H. M. Christensen, H. Im, P. A. Nuzzi, and E. H. Bresnick. 2000. Developmentally dynamic histone acetylation pattern of a tissue-specific chromatin domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14494–14499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritton, H. P., T. Igo-Kemenes, J. Nowock, U. Strech-Jurk, M. Theisen, and A. E. Sippel. 1984. Alternative sets of DNase I-hypersensitive sites characterize the various functional states of the chicken lysozyme gene. Nature 311: 163–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritton, H. P., T. Igo-Kemenes, J. Nowock, U. Strech-Jurk, M. Theisen, and A. E. Sippel. 1987. DNase I-hypersensitive sites in the chromatin structure of the lysozyme gene in steroid hormone target and non-target cells. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 368: 111–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry, C. J., and C. L. Peterson. 2001. Chromatin remodeling enzymes: who's on first? Curr. Biol. 11: R185-R187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethe, R., and L. Phi-van. 1994. The far upstream chicken lysozyme enhancer at −6.1 kilobase, by interacting with NF-M, mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of the chicken lysozyme gene in chicken myelomonocytic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 31302–31309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goethe, R., and L. Phi-van. 1998. Posttranscriptional lipopolysaccharide regulation of the lysozyme gene at processing of the primary transcript in myelomonocytic HD11 cells. J. Immunol. 160: 4970–4978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güttgens, B., A. Nastos, S. Kinston, S. Piltz, E. C. Delabesse, M. Stanley, M. J. Sanchez, A. Ciau-Uitz, R. Patient, and A. R. Green. 2002. Establishing the transcriptional programme for blood: the SCL stem cell enhancer is regulated by a multiprotein complex containing Ets and GATA factors. EMBO J. 21: 3039–3050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graf, T., K. McNagny, G. Brady, and J. Frampton. 1992. Chicken “erythroid” cells transformed by the gag-myb-ets-encoding E26 leukemia virus are multipotent. Cell 70: 201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, T., M. Theisen, U. Borgmeyer, T. Grussenmeyer, R. A. W. Rupp, A. Stief, F. Qian, A. Hecht, and A. E. Sippel. 1992. The −6.1-kilobase chicken lysozyme enhancer is a multifactorial complex containing several cell type-specific elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 2339–2350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gronostajski, R. M. 2000. Roles of the NFI/CTF gene family in transcription and development. Gene 16: 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gualdi, R., P. Bossard, M. Zheng, Y. Hamada, J. R. Coleman, and K. S. Zaret. 1996. Hepatic specification of the gut endoderm in vitro: cell signaling and transcriptional control. Genes Dev. 10: 1670–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzis, P., and I. Talianidis. 2002. Dynamics of enhancer-promoter communication during differentiation-induced gene activation. Mol. Cell 10: 1467–1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbes, T. R., A. L. Clayton, A. W. Thorne, and C. Crane-Robinson. 1994. Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken β-globin chromosomal domain. EMBO J. 13: 1823–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., D. Krause, M. Greaves, S. Sharkis, M. Dexter, C. Heyworth. and T. Enver. 1997. Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. Genes Dev. 11: 774–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. C., T. Graf, A. E. Sippel, and C. Bonifer. 1995. Dynamic changes in the chromatin of the chicken lysozyme gene domain during differentiation of multipotent progenitors to macrophages. DNA Cell Biol. 14: 397–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber, M., G. Krüger, and C. Bonifer. 1996. Genomic position effects lead to an inefficient reorganization of nucleosomes in the 5′ regulatory region of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 1443–1453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber, M. C., U. Jagle, G. Kruger, and C. Bonifer. 1997. The developmental activation of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice requires the interaction of a subset of enhancer elements with the promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 2992–3000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jägle, U., A. M. Müller, H. Kohler, and C. Bonifer. 1997. Role of positive and negative cis-regulatory elements regions in the regulation of transcriptional activation of the lysozyme locus in developing macrophages of transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 5871–5879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jantzen, K., H. P. Fritton, and Igo-T. Kemenes. 1986. The DNase I sensitive domain of the chicken lysozyme gene spans 24 kb. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 6085–6099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenuwein, T., and C. D. Allis. 2001. Translating the histone code. Science 293: 1074–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., E. Kowenz-Leutz, C. Müller, K. Meese, S. A. Ness, and A. Leutz. 1993. The NF-M transcription factor is related to C/EBPβ and plays a role in signal transduction, differentiation and leukemogenesis of avian myelomonocytic cells. EMBO J. 12: 1321–1332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komura, J., and A. D. Riggs. 1998. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-dependent PCR, a new, more sensitive approach to genomic footprinting and adduct detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 1807–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontaraki, J., H. H. Chen, A. D. Riggs, and C. Bonifer. 2000. Chromatin fine structure profiles for a developmentally regulated gene locus: reorganization of chromatin structure of the lysozyme locus before trans-activator binding and activation of gene expression. Genes Dev. 14: 2106–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzarides, T. 2002. Histone methylation in transcriptional control. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12: 198–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowenz-Leutz, E., G. Twamley, S. Ansieau, and A. Leutz. 1994. Novel mechanism of C/EBPβ (NF-M) transcriptional control: activation through derepression. Genes Dev. 8: 2781–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowenz-Leutz, E., and A. Leutz. 1999. A C/EBP beta isoform recruits the SWI/SNF complex to activate myeloid genes. Mol. Cell 4: 735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, G., M. Huber, and C. Bonifer. 1999. The −3.9 kb DNase I-hypersensitive site of the chicken lysozyme locus harbors an enhancer with unusual chromatin reorganizing activity. Gene 236: 63–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kundu, T. K., V. B. Palhan, Z. Wang, W. An, P. A. Cole, and R. G. Roeder. 2000. Activator-dependent transcription from chromatin in vitro involving targeted histone acetylation by p300. Mol. Cell 6: 551–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leahy, P., D. R. Crawford, G. Grossman, R. Gronostajski, and R. W. Hanson. 1999. CREB binding protein coordinates the function of multiple transcription factors including nuclear factor1 to regulate phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) gene transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 8813–8822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lefevre, P., J. Kontaraki, and C. Bonifer. 2001. Identification of factors mediating the developmental regulation of the −3.9 kb chicken lysozyme enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 4551–4560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litt, M. D., M. Simpson, M. Gaszner, C. D. Allis, and G. Felsenfeld. 2001. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken beta-globin locus. Science 293: 2453–2455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litt, M. D., M. Simpson, F. Recillas-Targa, M. N. Prioleau, and G. Felsenfeld. 2001. Transitions in histone acetylation reveal boundaries of three separately regulated neighboring loci. EMBO J. 20: 2224–2235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutz, M., L. J. Burke, G. Barreto., F. Goeman, H. Greb, R. Arnold, H. Schultheiss, A. Brehm, T. Kouzarides, V. Lobanenkov, and R. Renkawitz. 2000. Transcriptional repression by the insulator protein CTCF involves histone deacetylases. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 1707–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxam, A. M., and W. Gilbert. 1980. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 65: 499–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metz, T., and T. Graf. 1991. v-myb and v-ets transform chicken erythroid cells and cooperate both in trans and in cis to induce distinct differentiation phenotypes. Genes Dev. 5: 369–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mink, S., B. Haenig, and K. H. Klempnauer. 1997. Interaction and functional collaboration of p300 and C/EBPβ. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 6609–6617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, T., H. Iwasaki, B. Reizis, M. Ye, T. Graf, D. L. Weissman, and K. Akashi. 2002. Myeloid or lymphoid promiscuity as a critical step in hematopoietic commitment. Dev. Cell 3: 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., and N. Mermod. 2000. The histone-interacting domain of nuclear factor I activates simian virus 40 DNA replication in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 1645–1650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ness, S. A., E. Kowenz-Leutz, T. Casini, T. Graf, and A. Leutz. 1993. Myb and NF-M: combinatorial activators of myeloid genes in heterologous cell types. Genes Dev. 7: 749–759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeifer, G. P., R. Drouin, A. D. Riggs, and G. P. Holmquist. 1992. Binding of transcription factors generates hot spots for UV photoproducts in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 1798–1804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pina, B., U. Brüggemeier, and M. Beato. 1990. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mamary tumor virus promoter. Cell 60: 719–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippel, A. E., H. Saueressig, M. C. Huber, H. C. Hoefer, A. Stief, U. Borgmeyer, and C. Bonifer. 1996. Identification of cis-acting elements as DNase I-hypersensitive sites in lysozyme chromatin. Methods Enzymol. 274: 233–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soutoglou, E., and I. Talianidis. 2002. Coordination of PIC assembly and chromatin remodeling during differentiation-induced gene activation. Science 295: 1901–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, C., M. Muller, A. Baniahmad, and R. Renkawitz. 1987. Lysozyme gene activity in chicken macrophages is controlled by positive and negative regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 4163–4178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tagoh, H., R. Himes, D. Clarke, P. Leenen, A. D. Riggs, D. Hume, and C. Bonifer. 2002. Transcription factor complex formation and chromatin fine structure alterations at the murine c-fms (CSF-1 receptor) locus during myeloid precursor maturation. Genes Dev. 16: 1721–1737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenen, D. G., R. Hromas, J. D. Licht, and D. E. Zhang. 1997. Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 90: 489–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassin, H., E. J. Oakeley, and T. Grange. 1999. Identification of 5-methylcytosine in complex genomes. Methods 19: 465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., A. L. Clayton, and L. C. Mahadevan. 2001. Independent dynamic regulation of histone phosphorylation and acetylation during immediate-early gene induction. Mol. Cell 8: 1231–1241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolhuis., B., R. J. Palstra, E. Splinter, F. Grosveld, and W. de Laat. 2002. Looping and Interaction between Hypersensitive Sites in the Active beta-globin Locus. Mol. Cell 10: 1453–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, A. H., and Y. Ben-David. 2000. The role of Fli-1 in normal cell function and malignant transformation. Oncogene 19: 6482–6489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, E. Y., J. V. Falvo, A. V. Tsytsykova, A. K. Barczak, A. M. Reimold, L. H. Glimcher, M. J. Fenton, D. C. Gordon, L. F. Dunn, and A. E. Goldfeld. 2000. A lipopolysaccharide-specific enhancer complex involving Ets, Elk-1, Sp1, and CREB binding protein and p300 is recruited to the tumor necrosis factor alpha promoter in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 6084–6094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar