Processing of Double-Strand Breaks Is Involved in the Precise Excision of Paramecium Internal Eliminated Sequences

REFERENCES

• Berger, J. D. 1973. Nuclear differentiation and nucleic acid synthesis in well-fed exconjugants of Paramecium aurelia. Chromosoma 42: 247–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bétermier, M., S. Duharcourt, H. Seitz, and E. Meyer. 2000. Timing of developmentally programmed excision and circularization of Paramecium internal eliminated sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 1553–1561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalker, D. L., and M. C. Yao. 1996. Non-Mendelian, heritable blocks to DNA rearrangement are induced by loading the somatic nucleus of Tetrahymena thermophila with germ line-limited DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 3658–3667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champoux, J. J. 2001. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70: 369–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, N. L., R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Lambowitz. 2002. Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, A., and D. J. Finnegan. 2003. Excision of the Drosophila mariner transposon Mos1. Comparison with bacterial transposition and V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell 11: 225–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duharcourt, S., A. Butler, and E. Meyer. 1995. Epigenetic self-regulation of developmental excision of an internal eliminated sequence in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev. 9: 2065–2077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duharcourt, S., A. M. Keller, and E. Meyer. 1998. Homology-dependent maternal inhibition of developmental excision of internal eliminated sequences in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 7075–7085.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrity, P. A., and B. J. Wold. 1992. Effects of different DNA polymerases in ligation-mediated PCR: enhanced genomic sequencing and in vivo footprinting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 1021–1025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gratias, A., and M. Bétermier. 2001. Developmentally programmed excision of internal DNA sequences in Paramecium aurelia. Biochimie 83: 1009–1022.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallet, B., and D. J. Sherratt. 1997. Transposition and site-specific recombination: adapting DNA cut-and-paste mechanisms to a variety of genetic rearrangements. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 21: 157–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. E., and L. A. Klobutcher. 1996. The long and the short of developmental DNA deletion in Euplotes crassus. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43: 442–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jahn, C. L., and L. A. Klobutcher. 2002. Genome remodeling in ciliated protozoa. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56: 489–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaraczewski, J. W., J. S. Frels, and C. L. Jahn. 1994. Developmentally regulated, low abundance Tec element transcripts in Euplotes crassus—implications for DNA elimination and transposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4535–4542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spol1, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klobutcher, L. A., and G. Herrick. 1995. Consensus inverted terminal repeat sequence of Paramecium IESs: resemblance to termini of Tc1-related and Euplotes Tec transposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 2006–2013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klobutcher, L. A., and G. Herrick. 1997. Developmental genome reorganization in ciliated protozoa: the transposon link. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 56: 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Klobutcher, L. A., L. R. Turner, and J. LaPlante. 1993. Circular forms of developmentally excised DNA in Euplotes crassus have a heteroduplex junction. Genes Dev. 7: 84–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lampe, D. J., M. E. Churchill, and H. M. Robertson. 1996. A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. EMBO J. 15: 5470–5479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, D. J., M. E. Churchill, and H. M. Robertson. 1997. A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. Erratum. EMBO J. 16: 4153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer, K. M., and J. D. Forney. 1999. A mutation in the flanking 5′-TA-3′ dinucleotide prevents excision of an internal eliminated sequence from the Paramecium tetraurelia genome. Genetics 151: 597–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, E., and O. Garnier. 2002. Non-Mendelian inheritance and homology-dependent effects in ciliates. Adv. Genet. 46: 305–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, E., and A. M. Keller. 1996. A mendelian mutation affecting mating-type determination also affects developmental genomic rearrangements in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genetics 143: 191–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller, P. R., and B. Wold. 1989. In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation-mediated PCR. Science 246: 780–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preer, L. B., G. Hamilton, and J. R. Preer. 1992. Micronuclear DNA from Paramecium tetraurelia: serotype 51 A gene has internally eliminated sequences. J. Protozool. 39: 678–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Saveliev, S. V., and M. M. Cox. 1996. Developmentally programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila by a transposition-like reaction pathway. EMBO J. 15: 2858–2869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saveliev, S. V., and M. M. Cox. 2001. Product analysis illuminates the final steps of IES deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. EMBO J. 20: 3251–3261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saveliev, S. V., and M. M. Cox. 1995. Transient DNA breaks associated with programmed genomic deletion events in conjugating cells of Tetrahymena thermophila. Genes Dev. 9: 248–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonneborn, T. M. 1970. Methods in Paramecium research. Methods Cell Physiol. 4: 241–339.
   Google Scholar
• Sonneborn, T. M. 1974. Paramecium aurelia, p. 469–594. In R. C. King (ed.), Handbook of genetics: plants, plant viruses and protists, vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Turlan, C., and M. Chandler. 2000. Playing second fiddle: second-strand processing and liberation of transposable elements from donor DNA. Trends Microbiol. 8: 268–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, K., T. G. Doak, and G. Herrick. 1993. Developmental precise excision of Oxytricha trifallax telomere-bearing elements and formation of circles closed by a copy of the flanking target duplication. EMBO J. 12: 4593–4601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao, M. C., S. Duharcourt, and D. L. Chalker. 2002. Genome-wide rearrangements of DNA in ciliates, p. 730–758. In N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Lambowitz (ed.), Mobile DNA II. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar