Structural and Functional Analysis of Mutations along the Crystallographic Dimer Interface of the Yeast TATA Binding Protein

REFERENCES

• Adamkewicz, J. I., K. E. Hansen, W. A. Prud'homme, J. L. Davis, and J. Thorner. 2001. High affinity interaction of yeast transcriptional regulator, Mot1, with TATA box-binding protein (TBP). J. Biol. Chem. 276: 11883–11894.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andel, F., III, A. G. Ladurner, C. Inouye, R. Tjian, and E. Nogales. 1999. Three-dimensional structure of the human TFIID-IIA-IIB complex. Science 286: 2153–2156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. L. Ricupero, D. M. Eisenmann, and F. Winston. 1992. Biochemical and genetic characterization of a yeast TFIID mutant that alters transcription in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 2372–2382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. Ricupero-Hovasse, and F. Winston. 1995. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 14: 1490–1497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., C. R. Wobbe, S. Ricupero-Hovasse, K. Struhl, and F. Winston. 1994. Equivalent mutations in the two repeats of yeast TATA-binding protein confer distinct TATA recognition specificities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 3719–3728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auble, D. T., and S. Hahn. 1993. An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA. Genes Dev. 7: 844–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auble, D. T., K. E. Hansen, C. G. Mueller, W. S. Lane, J. Thorner, and S. Hahn. 1994. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 8: 1920–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auble, D. T., D. Wang, K. W. Post, and S. Hahn. 1997. Molecular analysis of the SNF2/SWI2 protein family member MOT1, an ATP-driven enzyme that dissociates TATA-binding protein from DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 4842–4851.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badarinarayana, V., Y. C. Chiang, and C. L. Denis. 2000. Functional interaction of CCR4-NOT proteins with TATAA-binding protein (TBP) and its associated factors in yeast. Genetics 155: 1045–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., G. M. Perez, J. M. Beechem, and P. A. Weil. 1997. Structure-function analysis of TAF130: identification and characterization of a high-affinity TATA-binding protein interaction domain in the N terminus of yeast TAF(II)130. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 3081–3093.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banik, U., J. M. Beechem, E. Klebanow, S. Schroeder, and P. A. Weil. 2001. Fluorescence-based analyses of the effects of full-length recombinant TAF130p on the interaction of TATA box-binding protein with TATA box DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 49100–49109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belotserkovskaya, R., D. E. Sterner, M. Deng, M. H. Sayre, P. M. Lieberman, and S. L. Berger. 2000. Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 634–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2002. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 7365–7371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2001. SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. Genes Dev. 15: 1935–1945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, W. S., and B. R. Cullen. 1997. A yeast TATA-binding protein mutant that selectively enhances gene expression from weak RNA polymerase II promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 2888–2896.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand, M., C. Leurent, V. Mallouh, L. Tora, and P. Schultz. 1999. Three-dimensional structures of the TAFII-containing complexes TFIID and TFTC. Science 286: 2151–2153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, G. O., L. S. Martel, S. K. Burley, and A. J. Berk. 1996. Radical mutations reveal TATA-box binding protein surfaces required for activated transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 10: 2491–2504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buratowski, S., and H. Zhou. 1992. Transcription factor IID mutants defective for interaction with transcription factor IIA. Science 255: 1130–1132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burley, S. K., and R. G. Roeder. 1996. Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 769–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. M., R. T. Ranallo, L. A. Stargell, and K. J. Lumb. 2000. Reevaluation of transcriptional regulation by TATA-binding protein oligomerization: predominance of monomers. Biochemistry 39: 2633–2638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cang, Y., D. T. Auble, and G. Prelich. 1999. A new regulatory domain on the TATA-binding protein. EMBO J. 18: 6662–6671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chasman, D. I., K. M. Flaherty, P. A. Sharp, and R. D. Kornberg. 1993. Crystal structure of yeast TATA-binding protein and model for interaction with DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8174–8178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicca, J. J., II, D. T. Auble, and B. F. Pugh. 1998. Cloning and biochemical characterization of TAF-172, a human homolog of yeast Mot1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 1701–1710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chitikila, C., K. L. Huisinga, J. D. Irvin, M. Mitra, and B. F. Pugh. 2002. Interplay of TBP inhibitors in global transcriptional control. Mol. Cell 10: 871–882.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, R. A., and B. F. Pugh. 1997. Slow dimer dissociation of the TATA binding protein dictates the kinetics of DNA binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 7221–7226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, R. A., A. K. Taggart, L. R. Benjamin, and B. F. Pugh. 1995. Dimerization of the TATA binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 13842–13849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. A., A. K. P. Taggart, S. Burma, J. J. Chicca, I. I., and B. F. Pugh. 1999. TFIIA regulates TBP and TFIID dimers. Mol. Cell 4: 451–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collart, M. A. 1996. The NOT, SPT3, and MOT1 genes functionally interact to regulate transcription at core promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 6668–6676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormack, B. P., M. Strubin, A. S. Ponticelli, and K. Struhl. 1991. Functional differences between yeast and human TFIID are localized to the highly conserved region. Cell 65: 341–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daugherty, M. A., M. Brenowitz, and M. G. Fried. 1999. The TATA-binding protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae oligomerizes in solution at micromolar concentrations to form tetramers and octamers. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 1389–1399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deluen, C., N. James, L. Maillet, M. Molinete, G. Theiler, M. Lemaire, N. Paquet, and M. A. Collart. 2002. The Ccr4-Not complex and yTAF1 [yTaf(II)130p/yTaf(II)145p] show physical and functional interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 6735–6749.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudley, A. M., C. Rougeulle, and F. Winston. 1999. The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. Genes Dev. 13: 2940–2945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisen, M. B., P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14863–14868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., K. M. Arndt, S. L. Ricupero, J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston. 1992. SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 6: 1319–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., C. Chapon, S. M. Roberts, C. Dollard, and F. Winston. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT8 gene encodes a very acidic protein that is functionally related to SPT3 and TATA-binding protein. Genetics 137: 647–657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geisberg, J. V., and K. Struhl. 2000. TATA-binding protein mutants that increase transcription from enhancerless and repressed promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 1478–1488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gietz, R. D., and R. H. Schiestl. 1995. Transforming yeast with DNA. Methods Mol. Biol. Cell. Biol. 5: 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Goppelt, A., and M. Meisterernst. 1996. Characterization of the basal inhibitor of class II transcription NC2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4450–4455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant, P. A., L. Duggan, J. Cote, S. M. Roberts, J. E. Brownell, R. Candau, R. Ohba, T. Owen-Hughes, C. D. Allis, F. Winston, S. L. Berger, and J. L. Workman. 1997. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11: 1640–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, P. A., D. Schieltz, M. G. Pray-Grant, D. J. Steger, J. C. Reese, J. R. Yates III, and J. L. Workman. 1998. A subset of TAF(II)s are integral components of the SAGA complex required for nucleosome acetylation and transcriptional stimulation. Cell 94: 45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagemeier, C., S. Walker, R. Caswell, T. Kouzarides, and J. Sinclair. 1992. The human cytomegalovirus 80-kilodalton but not the 72-kilodalton immediate-early protein transactivates heterologous promoters in a TATA box-dependent mechanism and interacts directly with TFIID. J. Virol. 66: 4452–4456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Icard-Liepkalns, C. 1993. Binding activity of the human transcription factor TFIID. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193: 453–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370: 481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson-Fisher, A. J., S. Burma, M. Portnoy, L. Schneeweis, R. A. Coleman, M. Mitra, C. Chitikila, and B. F. Pugh. 1999. Dimer dissociation and thermosensitivity kinetics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human TATA binding proteins. Biochemistry 38: 11340–11348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson-Fisher, A. J., C. Chitikila, M. Mitra, and B. F. Pugh. 1999. A role for TBP dimerization in preventing unregulated gene expression. Mol. Cell 3: 717–727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamada, K., F. Shu, H. Chen, S. Malik, G. Stelzer, R. G. Roeder, M. Meisterernst, and S. K. Burley. 2001. Crystal structure of negative cofactor 2 recognizing the TBP-DNA transcription complex. Cell 106: 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, K., Y. Makino, T. Kishimoto, J. Yamauchi, S. Kato, M. Muramatsu, and T. Tamura. 1994. Multimerization of the mouse TATA-binding protein (TBP) driven by its C-terminal conserved domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 1179–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. L., D. B. Nikolov, and S. K. Burley. 1993. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature 365: 520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., J. G. Na, M. Hampsey, and D. Reinberg. 1997. The Dr1/DRAP1 heterodimer is a global repressor of transcription in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 820–825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, Y., J. H. Geiger, S. Hahn, and P. B. Sigler. 1993. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature 365: 512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A., T. Miyake, Y. Ohyama, M. Kawaichi, and T. Kokubo. 2001. Mutations in the TATA-binding protein, affecting transcriptional activation, show synthetic lethality with the TAF145 gene lacking the TAF N-terminal domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 395–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokubo, T., M. J. Swanson, J. I. Nishikawa, A. G. Hinnebusch, and Y. Nakatani. 1998. The yeast TAF145 inhibitory domain and TFIIA competitively bind to TATA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 1003–1012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotani, T., K. Banno, M. Ikura, A. G. Hinnebusch, Y. Nakatani, M. Kawaichi, and T. Kokubo. 2000. A role of transcriptional activators as antirepressors for the autoinhibitory activity of TATA box binding of transcription factor IID. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7178–7183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotani, T., T. Miyake, Y. Tsukihashi, A. G. Hinnebusch, Y. Nakatani, M. Kawaichi, and T. Kokubo. 1998. Identification of highly conserved amino-terminal segments of dTAFII230 and yTAFII145 that are functionally interchangeable for inhibiting TBP-DNA interactions in vitro and in promoting yeast cell growth in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 32254–32264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuddus, R., and M. C. Schmidt. 1993. Effect of the non-conserved N-terminus on the DNA binding activity of the yeast TATA binding protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 1789–1796.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuras, L., P. Kosa, M. Mencia, and K. Struhl. 2000. TAF-containing and TAF-independent forms of transcriptionally active TBP in vivo. Science 288: 1244–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras, L., and K. Struhl. 1999. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 399: 609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larschan, E., and F. Winston. 2001. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15: 1946–1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, D. K., J. DeJong, S. Hashimoto, M. Horikoshi, and R. G. Roeder. 1992. TFIIA induces conformational changes in TFIID via interactions with the basic repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 5189–5196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, M., and K. Struhl. 2001. Multiple functions of the nonconserved N-terminal domain of yeast TATA-binding protein. Genetics 158: 87–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, M., and K. Struhl. 1995. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 5461–5469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leurent, C., S. Sanders, C. Ruhlmann, V. Mallouh, P. A. Weil, D. B. Kirschner, L. Tora, and P. Schultz. 2002. Mapping histone fold TAFs within yeast TFIID. EMBO J. 21: 3424–3433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X.-Y., A. Virbasius, X. Zhu, and M. Green. 1999. Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors. Nature 399: 605–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. Y., S. R. Bhaumik, and M. R. Green. 2000. Distinct classes of yeast promoters revealed by differential TAF recruitment. Science 288: 1242–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., R. Ishima, K. I. Tong, S. Bagby, T. Kokubo, D. R. Muhandiram, L. E. Kay, Y. Nakatani, and M. Ikura. 1998. Solution structure of a TBP-TAF(II)230 complex: protein mimicry of the minor groove surface of the TATA box unwound by TBP. Cell 94: 573–583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maillet, L., C. Tu, Y. K. Hong, E. O. Shuster, and M. A. Collart. 2000. The essential function of Not1 lies within the Ccr4-Not complex. J. Mol. Biol. 303: 131–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mermelstein, F., K. Yeung, J. Cao, J. A. Inostroza, H. Erdjument-Bromage, K. Eagelson, D. Landsman, P. Levitt, P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg. 1996. Requirement of a corepressor for Dr1-mediated repression of transcription. Genes Dev. 10: 1033–1048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muldrow, T. A., A. M. Campbell, P. A. Weil, and D. T. Auble. 1999. MOT1 can activate basal transcription in vitro by regulating the distribution of TATA binding protein between promoter and nonpromoter sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 2835–2845.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikolov, D. B., S. H. Hu, J. Lin, A. Gasch, A. Hoffmann, M. Horikoshi, N. H. Chua, R. G. Roeder, and S. K. Burley. 1992. Crystal structure of TFIID TATA-box binding protein. Nature 360: 40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, J., T. Kokubo, M. Horikoshi, R. G. Roeder, and Y. Nakatani. 1997. Drosophila TAF(II)230 and the transcriptional activator VP16 bind competitively to the TATA box-binding domain of the TATA box-binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 85–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira, L. A., J. A. van der Knaap, V. van den Boom, F. A. van den Heuvel, and H. T. Timmers. 2001. TAF(II)170 interacts with the concave surface of TATA-binding protein to inhibit its DNA binding activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 7523–7534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez-Howard, G. M., P. A. Weil, and J. M. Beechem. 1995. Yeast TATA binding protein interaction with DNA: fluorescence determination of oligomeric state, equilibrium binding, on-rate, and dissociation kinetics. Biochemistry 34: 8005–8017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, D., A. M. Campbell, Y. Bai, and P. A. Weil. 1994. Yeast TAF170 is encoded by MOT1 and exists in a TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-TBP-associated factor complex distinct from transcription factor IID. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 23135–23140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poon, D., S. Schroeder, C. K. Wang, T. Yamamoto, M. Horikoshi, R. G. Roeder, and P. A. Weil. 1991. The conserved carboxy-terminal domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID is sufficient to support normal cell growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 4809–4821.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pugh, B. F. 2000. Control of gene expression through regulation of the TATA binding protein. Gene 255: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, P., and S. Hahn. 1991. Dominant negative mutations in yeast TFIID define a bipartite DNA-binding region. Cell 65: 349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, J. C., L. Apone, S. S. Walker, L. A. Griffin, and M. R. Green. 1994. Yeast TAFIIS in a multisubunit complex required for activated transcription. Nature 371: 523–527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, S. L., K. A. Garbett, and P. A. Weil. 2002. Molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 6000–6013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strubin, M., and K. Struhl. 1992. Yeast and human TFIID with altered DNA-binding specificity for TATA elements. Cell 68: 721–730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struhl, K. 1999. Fundamentally different logic of gene regulation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Cell 98: 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, A. K., and B. F. Pugh. 1996. Dimerization of TFIID when not bound to DNA. Science 272: 1331–1333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winston, F., K. J. Durbin, and G. R. Fink. 1984. The SPT3 gene is required for normal transcription of Ty elements in S. cerevisiae. Cell 39: 675–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrick, J. J., F. C. Holstege, E. G. Jennings, H. C. Causton, D. Shore, M. Grunstein, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Young. 1999. Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast. Nature 402: 418–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, T., M. Horikoshi, J. Wang, S. Hasegawa, P. A. Weil, and R. G. Roeder. 1992. A bipartite DNA binding domain composed of direct repeats in the TATA box binding factor TFIID. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2844–2848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou, Q. A., M. C. Schmidt, and A. J. Berk. 1991. Requirement for acidic amino acid residues immediately N-terminal to the conserved domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID. EMBO J. 10: 1843–1852.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar