Genome-Wide Analysis of the Relationship between Transcriptional Regulation by Rpd3p and the Histone H3 and H4 Amino Termini in Budding Yeast

REFERENCES

• Agalioti, T., Chen G., and Thanos D.. 2002. Deciphering the transcriptional histone acetylation code for a human gene. Cell 111:381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg Y.. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57:289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. E., Tong J. K., and Schreiber S. L.. 2000. Genomewide studies of histone deacetylase function in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13708–13713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, R., and Ptashne M.. 1984. A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene. Nature 312:612–615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, C. E., Lechner T., Howe L., and Workman J. L.. 2000. The many HATs of transcription coactivators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet, A., Sweeney L. B., Sturgill J. F., Chua K. F., Greer P. L., Lin Y., Tran H., Ross S. E., Mostoslavsky R., Cohen H. Y., Hu L. S., Cheng H. L., Jedrychowski M. P., Gygi S. P., Sinclair D. A., Alt F. W., and Greenberg M. E.. 2004. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science 303:2011–2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, P., Allis C. D., and Sassone-Corsi P.. 2000. Signaling to chromatin through histone modifications. Cell 103:263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., and Hieter P.. 1992. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110:119–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckert, J., and Struhl K.. 2002. Targeted recruitment of Rpd3 histone deacetylase represses transcription by inhibiting recruitment of Swi/Snf, SAGA, and TATA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6458–6470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRisi, J. L., Iyer V. R., and Brown P. O.. 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, Y., and Gorovsky M. A.. 2000. Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by creating a charge patch. Mol. Cell 6:225–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrin, L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., and Grunstein M.. 1991. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell 65:1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. G., Smith M. M., and Roth S. Y.. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247–1259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisen, M. B., Spellman P. T., Brown P. O., and Botstein D.. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14863–14868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galarneau, L., Nourani A., Boudreault A. A., Zhang Y., Heliot L., Allard S., Savard J., Lane W. S., Stillman D. J., and Cote J.. 2000. Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription. Mol. Cell 5:927–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, M., and Grunstein M.. 1988. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55:1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstege, F. C., Jennings E. G., Wyrick J. J., Lee T. I., Hengartner C. J., Green M. R., Golub T. R., Lander E. S., and Young R. A.. 1998. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95:717–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and Struhl K.. 1998. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:797–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and Struhl K.. 1997. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89:365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and Struhl K.. 1998. Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5121–5127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayne, P. S., Kim U. J., Han M., Mullen J. R., Yoshizaki F., and Grunstein M.. 1988. Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell 55:27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzarides, T. 2000. Acetylation: a regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation? EMBO J. 19:1176–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdistani, S. K., Robyr D., Tavazoie S., and Grunstein M.. 2002. Genome-wide binding map of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 in yeast. Nat. Genet. 31:248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, D., and Lopez J.. 1995. GAL4/GAL80-dependent nucleosome disruption/deposition on the upstream regions of the yeast GAL1-10 and GAL80 genes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:27671–27678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann, R. K., and Grunstein M.. 1992. Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo. EMBO J. 11:3297–3306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. M., Pouchnik D. J., Walker J. L., and Wyrick J. J.. 2004. Redundant roles for histone H3 N-terminal lysine residues in subtelomeric gene repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167:1123–1132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Megee, P. C., Morgan B. A., Mittman B. A., and Smith M. M.. 1990. Genetic analysis of histone H4: essential role of lysines subject to reversible acetylation. Science 247:841–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megee, P. C., Morgan B. A., and Smith M. M.. 1995. Histone H4 and the maintenance of genome integrity. Genes Dev. 9:1716–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, J. M., and Holmberg S.. 1998. Nucleosome structure of the yeast CHA1 promoter: analysis of activation-dependent chromatin remodeling of an RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed gene in TBP and RNA pol II mutants defective in vivo in response to acidic activators. EMBO J. 17:6028–6038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan, B. A., Mittman B. A., and Smith M. M.. 1991. The highly conserved N-terminal domains of histones H3 and H4 are required for normal cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4111–4120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., Grigull J., Mohammad N., and Hughes T. R.. 2002. FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC Bioinformatics 3:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robyr, D., Suka Y., Xenarios I., Kurdistani S. K., Wang A., Suka N., and Grunstein M.. 2002. Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell 109:437–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., Winston F., and Hieter P.. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., Carmen A. A., Kobayashi R., Bavykin S., Turner B. M., and Grunstein M.. 1996. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14503–14508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., Carmen A. A., Suka N., Turner B. M., and Grunstein M.. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392:831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. P., Jones R., and Morse R. H.. 1998. SWI-SNF complex participation in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to activator binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1774–1782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan, M. P., Stafford G. A., Yu L., and Morse R. H.. 2000. Artificially recruited TATA-binding protein fails to remodel chromatin and does not activate three promoters that require chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5847–5857.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabet, N., Tong F., Madigan J. P., Volo S., Smith M. M., and Morse R. H.. 2003. Global and specific transcriptional repression by the histone H3 amino terminus in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4084–4089.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandmeier, J. J., French S., Osheim Y., Cheung W. L., Gallo C. M., Beyer A. L., and Smith J. S.. 2002. RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase. EMBO J. 21:4959–4968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. E., Brown T. A., and Trumpower B. L.. 1990. A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3091–3092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, M., Takahashi K., Lamb T. M., Shindo H., and Mitchell A. P.. 2003. Yeast Ume6p repressor permits activator binding but restricts TBP binding at the HOP1 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3033–3037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, G. A., and Morse R. H.. 1998. Mutations in the AF-2/hormone-binding domain of the chimeric activator GAL4.estrogen receptor.VP16 inhibit hormone-dependent transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273:34240–34246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterner, D. E., and Berger S. L.. 2000. Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:435–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahl, B. D., and Allis C. D.. 2000. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suka, N., Suka Y., Carmen A. A., Wu J., and Grunstein M.. 2001. Highly specific antibodies determine histone acetylation site usage in yeast heterochromatin and euchromatin. Mol. Cell 8:473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taunton, J., Hassig C. A., and Schreiber S. L.. 1996. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 272:408–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. S., Ling X., and Grunstein M.. 1994. Histone H3 amino terminus is required for telomeric and silent mating locus repression in yeast. Nature 369:245–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, B. M. 1993. Decoding the nucleosome. Cell 75:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. M. 2000. Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays 22:836–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelauer, M., Wu J., Suka N., and Grunstein M.. 2000. Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nature 408:495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. D., Edmondson D. G., Bone J. R., Mukai Y., Yu Y., Du W., Stillman D. J., and Roth S. Y.. 2000. Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737–2744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Suka N., Carlson M., and Grunstein M.. 2001. TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol. Cell 7:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Bone J. R., Edmondson D. G., Turner B. M., and Roth S. Y.. 1998. Essential and redundant functions of histone acetylation revealed by mutation of target lysines and loss of the Gcn5p acetyltransferase. EMBO J. 17:3155–3167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and Reinberg D.. 2001. Transcription regulation by histone methylation: interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails. Genes Dev. 15:2343–2360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar