The Mouse Genomic Instability Mutation chaos1 Is an Allele of Polq That Exhibits Genetic Interaction with Atm

REFERENCES

• Abraham, R. T. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2177–2196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, A. A., Eisen M. B., Davis R. E., Ma C., Lossos I. S., Rosenwald A., Boldrick J. C., Sabet H., Tran T., Yu X., Powell J. I., Yang L., Marti G. E., Moore T., Hudson J. J., Lu L., Lewis D. B., Tibshirani R., Sherlock G., Chan W. C., Greiner T. C., Weisenburger D. D., Armitage J. O., Warnke R., Levy R., Wilson W., Grever M. R., Byrd J. C., Botstein D., Brown P. O., and Staudt L. M.. 2000. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403:503–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balling, R. 2001. ENU mutagenesis: analyzing gene function in mice. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2:463–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., Hirotsune S., Paylor R., Liyanage M., Eckhaus M., Collins F., Shiloh Y., Crawley J. N., Ried T., Tagle D., and Wynshaw-Boris A.. 1996. Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 86:159–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. B., Sakaguchi K., and Harris P. V.. 1990. mus308 mutants of Drosophila exhibit hypersensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents and are defective in a deoxyribonuclease. Genetics 125:813–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dertinger, S. D., Torous D. K., and Tometsko K. R.. 1996. Simple and reliable enumeration of micronucleated reticulocytes with a single-laser flow cytometer. Mutat. Res. 371:283–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedberg, E. C., Wagner R., and Radman M.. 2002. Specialized DNA polymerases, cellular survival, and the genesis of mutations. Science 296:1627–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, S. E., Rosenberg E., Khalil A., McEwen A., Holmes M., Neill S., Povirk L. F., and Valerie K.. 2004. Double strand break repair by homologous recombination is regulated by cell cycle-independent signaling via ATM in human glioma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279:15402–15410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurley, K. E., and Kemp C. J.. 2001. Synthetic lethality between mutation in Atm and DNA-PK(cs) during murine embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 11:191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. V., Mazina O. M., Leonhardt E. A., Case R. B., Boyd J. B., and Burtis K. C.. 1996. Molecular cloning of Drosophila mus308, a gene involved in DNA cross-link repair with homology to prokaryotic DNA polymerase I genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5764–5771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddle, J. A. 1973. A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage. Mutat. Res. 18:187–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer, B. S., MacAuley A., Behrendtsen O., and Werb Z.. 2000. Hypersensitivity to DNA damage leads to increased apoptosis during early mouse development. Genes Dev. 14:2072–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitotsumachi, S., Carpenter D. A., and Russell W. L.. 1985. Dose-repetition increases the mutagenic effectiveness of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in mouse spermatogonia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:6619–6621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeijmakers, J. H. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubscher, U., Maga G., and Spadari S.. 2002. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71:133–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaar, R., Hoeijmakers J. H., and van Gent D. C.. 1998. Molecular mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 8:483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura, K., Bahar R., Seimiya M., Chiyo M., Wada A., Okada S., Hatano M., Tokuhisa T., Kimura H., Watanabe S., Honda I., Sakiyama S., Tagawa M., and Wang J. O.. 2004. DNA polymerase theta is preferentially expressed in lymphoid tissues and upregulated in human cancers. Int. J. Cancer 109:9–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khanna, K. K., and Jackson S. P.. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurencon, A., Orme C. M., Peters H. K., Boulton C. L., Vladar E. K., Langley S. A., Bakis E. P., Harris D. T., Harris N. J., Wayson S. M., Hawley R. S., and Burtis K. C.. 2004. A large-scale screen for mutagen-sensitive Loci in Drosophila. Genetics 167:217–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lees-Miller, S. P., and Meek K.. 2003. Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. Biochimie 85:1161–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, E. A., Henderson D. S., Rinehart J. E., and Boyd J. B.. 1993. Characterization of the mus308 gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 133:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maga, G., Shevelev I., Ramadan K., Spadari S., and Hubscher U.. 2002. DNA polymerase theta purified from human cells is a high-fidelity enzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 319:359–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini, F., Kim N., Schuffert A., and Wood R. D.. 2003. POLN, a nuclear PolA family DNA polymerase homologous to the DNA cross-link sensitivity protein Mus308. J. Biol. Chem. 278:32014–32019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, F., and Wood R. D.. 2002. A human DNA helicase homologous to the DNA cross-link sensitivity protein Mus308. J. Biol. Chem. 277:8716–8723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masutani, M., Nakagama H., and Sugimura T.. 2003. Poly(ADP-ribose) and carcinogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 38:339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menisser-de Murcia, J., Mark M., Wendling O., Wynshaw-Boris A., and de Murcia G.. 2001. Early embryonic lethality in PARP-1 Atm double-mutant mice suggests a functional synergy in cell proliferation during development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:1828–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita, T., Asano N., Awogi T., Sasaki Y. F., Sato S., Shimada H., Sutou S., Suzuki T., Wakata A., Sofuni T., Hayashi M., et al. 1997. Evaluation of the rodent micronucleus assay in the screening of IARC carcinogens (groups 1, 2A and 2B): the summary report of the 6th collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS MMS. Mutat. Res. 389:3–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., Sonoda E., Takao N., Shinohara A., Yamamoto K., and Takeda S.. 2000. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusse, M., Miller B. M., Viaggi S., and Grawe J.. 1996. Analysis of the DNA content distribution of micronuclei using flow sorting and fluorescent in situ hybridization with a centromeric DNA probe. Mutagenesis 11:405–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petiniot, L. K., Weaver Z., Barlow C., Shen R., Eckhaus M., Steinberg S. M., Ried T., Wynshaw-Boris A., and Hodes R. J.. 2000. Recombinase-activating gene (RAG) 2-mediated V(D)J recombination is not essential for tumorigenesis in Atm-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6664–6669.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petiniot, L. K., Weaver Z., Vacchio M., Shen R., Wangsa D., Barlow C., Eckhaus M., Steinberg S. M., Wynshaw-Boris A., Ried T., and Hodes R. J.. 2002. RAG-mediated V(D)J. recombination is not essential for tumorigenesis in Atm-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:3174–3317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prakash, S., and Prakash L.. 2002. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev. 16:1872–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray, A. J., and Strathern J. N.. 2003. Error-prone DNA polymerases: when making a mistake is the only way to get ahead. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37:31–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki, M., Marini F., and Wood R. D.. 2003. POLQ (Pol theta), a DNA polymerase and DNA-dependent ATPase in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6117–6126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi, J., Ferguson D. O., Chen H. T., Yang E. M., Earle J., Frank K., Whitlow S., Gu Y., Nussenzweig Y. X., Nussenzweig A., and Alt F. W.. 2001. Genetic interactions between ATM and the nonhomologous end-joining factors in genomic stability and development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3243–3248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shcherbakova, P. V., Bebenek K., and Kunkel T. A.. 2003. Functions of eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ. 2003:RE3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shima, N., Hartford S. A., Duffy T., Wilson L. A., Schimenti K. J., and Schimenti J. C.. 2003. Phenotype-based identification of mouse chromosome instability mutants. Genetics 163:1031–1040.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, L. H., and Schild D.. 1999. The contribution of homologous recombination in preserving genome integrity in mammalian cells. Biochimie 81:87–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. H., and Schild D.. 2001. Homologous recombinational repair of DNA ensures mammalian chromosome stability. Mutat. Res. 477:131–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treuner, K., Helton R., and Barlow C.. 2004. Loss of Rad52 partially rescues tumorigenesis and T-cell maturation in Atm-deficient mice. Oncogene 23:4655–4661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valerie, K., and Povirk L. F.. 2003. Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair. Oncogene 22:5792–5812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Wang X., Iliakis G., and Wang Y.. 2003. Caffeine could not efficiently sensitize homologous recombination repair-deficient cells to ionizing radiation-induced killing. Radiat. Res. 159:420–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, X., Wang H., Iliakis G., and Wang Y.. 2003. Caffeine-induced radiosensitization is independent of nonhomologous end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Radiat. Res. 159:426–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. A., Elson A., and Leder P.. 1997. Loss of p21 increases sensitivity to ionizing radiation and delays the onset of lymphoma in atm-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14590–14595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, R. A., and Poon R. Y.. 2004. Activated oncogenes promote and cooperate with chromosomal instability for neoplastic transformation. Genes Dev. 18:1317–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar