Association of Rad9 with Double-Strand Breaks through a Mec1-Dependent Mechanism

REFERENCES

• Abraham, R. T. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2177–2196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortez, D., Guntuku S., Qin J., and Elledge S. J.. 2001. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294:1713–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, L. L., Nakamura T. M., Moser B. A., and Russell P.. 2003. Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6150–6158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durocher, D., Henckel J., Fersht A. R., and Jackson S. P.. 1999. The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell 4:387–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, R. J., Bentley N. J., and Carr A. M.. 1999. A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:393–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elledge, S. J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emili, A. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietz, R. D., and Sugino A.. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. S., Green C. M., and Lowndes N. F.. 2001. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 8:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., and Lowndes N. F.. 2000. A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C. Curr. Biol. 10:39–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katou, Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K.. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424:1073–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 1999. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1136–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, T., Wakayama T., Naiki T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 2001. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 5543:867–870.
   Google Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., Foiani M., Muzi-Falconi M., Lucchini G., and Plevani P.. 1998. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 17:5525–5528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallory, J. C., and Petes T. D.. 2000. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13749–13754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, J. A., Cohen J., and Toczyski D. P.. 2001. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 21:2809–2821.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. M., Tagle D. A., Shiloh Y., Collins F. S., and Hieter P.. 1995. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82:831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiki, T., Shimomura T., Kondo T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 2000. Rfc5, in cooperation with Rad24, controls DNA damage checkpoints throughout the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5888–5896.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakada, D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 2003. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17:1957–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakada, D., Shimomura T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 2003. The ATM-related Tel1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls a checkpoint response following phleomycin treatment. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:1715–1724.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paciotti, V., Clerici M., Lucchini G., and Longhese M. P.. 2000. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2046–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicioli, A., Lee S. E., Lucca C., Foiani M., and Haber J. E.. 2001. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, R. J., Sunjevaric I., Keddache M., and Rothstein R.. 2002. Efficient PCR-based gene disruption in Saccharomyces strains using intergenic primers. Yeast 19:319–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouse, J., and Jackson S. P.. 2000. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19:5793–5800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouse, J., and Jackson S. P.. 2002. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9:857–869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saka, Y., Esashi F., Matsusaka T., Mochida S., and Yanagida M.. 1997. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev. 11:3387–3400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez, Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., and Elledge S. J.. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., and Elledge S. J.. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinase MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Duong J. K., Sun Z., Morrow J. S., Pradhan D., and Stern D. F.. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, K., Ando S., Shimomura T., and Matsumoto K.. 1997. Rfc5, replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5905–5914.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, Z., Fay D. S., Marini F., Foiani M., and Stern D. F.. 1996. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 10:395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., Hsiao J., Fay D. S., and Stern D. F.. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toczyski, D. P., Galgoczy D. J., and Hartwell L. H.. 1997. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90:1097–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard, J. E., Gilbert C. S., Green C. M., and Lowndes N. F.. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakayama, T., Kondo T., Ando S., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K.. 2001. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:755–764.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., and Hartwell L. H.. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. I., and Haber J. E.. 1990. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9:663–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Muller E. G. D., and Rothstein R.. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pool. Mol. Cell 2:329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B.-B. S., and Elledge S. J.. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, L., and Elledge S. J.. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar