Localized Histone Acetylation and Deacetylation Triggered by the Homologous Recombination Pathway of Double-Strand DNA Repair

REFERENCES

• Anderson, J. D., P. T. Lowary, and J. Widom. 2001. Effects of histone acetylation on the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 307:977–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlev, N. A., V. Poltoratsky, T. Owen-Hughes, C. Ying, L. Liu, J. L. Workman, and S. L. Berger. 1998. Repression of GCN5 histone acetyltransferase activity via bromodomain-mediated binding and phosphorylation by the Ku-DNA-dependent protein kinase complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1349–1358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett, C. B., A. L. Lewis, K. K. Baldwin, and M. A. Resnick. 1993. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5613–5617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, A. W., D. Y. Yu, M. G. Pray-Grant, Q. Qiu, K. E. Harmon, P. C. Megee, P. A. Grant, M. M. Smith, and M. F. Christman. 2002. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419:411–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, S. J., A. Gartner, J. Reboul, P. Vaglio, N. Dyson, D. E. Hill, and M. Vidal. 2002. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295:127–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choy, J. S., and S. J. Kron. 2002. NuA4 subunit Yng2 function in intra-S-phase DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8215–8225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, J. A., S. Allard, O. Jobin-Robitaille, A. Javaheri, A. Auger, N. Bouchard, S. J. Kron, S. P. Jackson, and J. Cote. 2004. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 16:979–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, J. A., N. F. Lowndes, and S. P. Jackson. 2000. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408:1001–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Adams, G., and M. Grunstein. 1995. Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the GAL1 promoter. EMBO J. 14:1468–1477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freiman, R. N., and R. Tjian. 2003. Regulating the regulators: lysine modifications make their mark. Cell 112:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannattasio, M., F. Lazzaro, P. Plevani, and M. Muzi-Falconi. 2005. The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J. Biol. Chem. 280:9879–9886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haber, J. E. 2000. Lucky breaks: analysis of recombination in Saccharomyces. Mutat. Res. 451:53–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasan, S., and M. O. Hottiger. 2002. Histone acetyl transferases: a role in DNA repair and DNA replication. J. Mol. Med. 80:463–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, G. J., J. C. Tanny, A. D. Rudner, S. A. Gerber, S. Danaie, S. P. Gygi, and D. Moazed. 2002. Steps in assembly of silent chromatin in yeast: Sir3-independent binding of a Sir2/Sir4 complex to silencers and role for Sir2-dependent deacetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:4167–4180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyen, Y., O. Zgheib, R. A. Ditullio, Jr., V. G. Gorgoulis, P. Zacharatos, T. J. Petty, E. A. Sheston, H. S. Mellert, E. S. Stavridi, and T. D. Halazonetis. 2004. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432:406–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iizuka, M., and M. M. Smith. 2003. Functional consequences of histone modifications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. J., P. M. Laurenson, and L. Pillus. 2004. Functional analyses of chromatin modifications in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 377:3–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jazayeri, A., A. D. McAinsh, and S. P. Jackson. 2004. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3p facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1644–1649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornberg, R. D., and J. O. Thomas. 1974. Chromatin structure: oligomers of the histones. Science 184:865–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M. H., and C. D. Allis. 1999. In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment. Methods 19:425–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. E., F. Paques, J. Sylvan, and J. E. Haber. 1999. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 9:767–770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, S. E., A. Pellicioli, M. B. Vaze, N. Sugawara, A. Malkova, M. Foiani, and J. E. Haber. 2003. Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8913–8923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenfant, F., R. K. Mann, B. Thomsen, X. Ling, and M. Grunstein. 1996. All four core histone N-termini contain sequences required for the repression of basal transcription in yeast. EMBO J. 15:3974–3985.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lisby, M., J. H. Barlow, R. C. Burgess, and R. Rothstein. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, K., T. J. Rechsteiner, and T. J. Richmond. 1999. Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. Methods Mol. Biol. 119:1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malone, R. E., and R. E. Esposito. 1980. The RAD52 gene is required for homothallic interconversion of mating types and spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. K., and M. Grunstein. 1992. Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo. EMBO J. 11:3297–3306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. G., T. Laroche, N. Suka, M. Grunstein, and S. M. Gasser. 1999. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell 97:621–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, C., B. Shafer, and J. Strathern. 1989. Coconversion of flanking sequences with homothallic switching. Cell 57:459–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Megee, P. C., B. A. Morgan, and M. M. Smith. 1995. Histone H4 and the maintenance of genome integrity. Genes Dev. 9:1716–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. D., D. A. Sinclair, and L. Guarente. 1999. MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 97:609–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. J., J. Highland, N. J. Krogan, A. Arbel-Eden, J. F. Greenblatt, J. E. Haber, and X. Shen. 2004. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119:767–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull, T. T., E. P. Rogakou, V. Yamazaki, C. U. Kirchgessner, M. Gellert, and W. M. Bonner. 2000. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10:886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothof, J., G. van Haaften, K. Thijssen, R. S. Kamath, A. G. Fraser, J. Ahringer, R. H. Plasterk, and M. Tijsterman. 2003. Identification of genes that protect the C. elegans genome against mutations by genome-wide RNAi. Genes Dev. 17:443–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, S., and M. R. Parthun. 2002. Histone H3 and the histone acetyltransferase Hat1p contribute to DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8353–8365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveh, D., S. H. Hughes, B. K. Shafer, and J. N. Strathern. 1989. Analysis of the HO-cleaved MAT DNA intermediate generated during the mating type switch in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 220:33–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robert, F., D. K. Pokholok, N. M. Hannett, N. J. Rinaldi, M. Chandy, A. Rolfe, J. L. Workman, D. K. Gifford, and R. A. Young. 2004. Global position and recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the yeast genome. Mol. Cell 16:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robyr, D., Y. Suka, I. Xenarios, S. K. Kurdistani, A. Wang, N. Suka, and M. Grunstein. 2002. Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell 109:437–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusche, L. N., and J. Rine. 2001. Conversion of a gene-specific repressor to a regional silencer. Genes Dev. 15:955–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S. L., M. Portoso, J. Mata, J. Bahler, R. C. Allshire, and T. Kouzarides. 2004. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119:603–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroff, R., A. Arbel-Eden, D. Pilch, G. Ira, W. M. Bonner, J. H. Petrini, J. E. Haber, and M. Lichten. 2004. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14:1703–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis. 2000. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J. E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:209–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suka, N., Y. Suka, A. A. Carmen, J. Wu, and M. Grunstein. 2001. Highly specific antibodies determine histone acetylation site usage in yeast heterochromatin and euchromatin. Mol. Cell 8:473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, P., K. M. Trujillo, and S. Van Komen. 2000. Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451:257–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Attikum, H., O. Fritsch, B. Hohn, and S. M. Gasser. 2004. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, J. S., R. K. Mann, and M. Grunstein. 1995. Yeast histone H3 and H4 N termini function through different GAL1 regulatory elements to repress and activate transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5664–5668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., J. K. Moore, and J. E. Haber. 1996. Mechanism of MATα donor preference during mating-type switching of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:657–668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar