The DNA Repair Protein yKu80 Regulates the Function of Recombination Enhancer during Yeast Mating Type Switching

REFERENCES

• Bi, X., and J. R. Broach. 1999. UASrpg can function as a heterochromatin boundary element in yeast. Genes Dev. 13:1089–1101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brachmann, R. K., K. Yu, Y. Eby, N. P. Pavletich, and J. D. Boeke. 1998. Genetic selection of intragenic suppressor mutations that reverse the effect of common p53 cancer mutations. EMBO J. 17:1847–1859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casellas, R., A. Nussenzweig, R. Wuerffel, R. Pelanda, A. Reichlin, H. Suh, X. F. Qin, E. Besmer, A. Kenter, K. Rajewsky, and M. C. Nussenzweig. 1998. Ku80 is required for immunoglobulin isotype switching. EMBO J. 17:2404–2411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cervelli, T., and A. Galli. 2000. Effects of HDF1 (Ku70) and HDF2 (Ku80) on spontaneous and DNA damage-induced intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264:56–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cervelli, T., and A. Galli. 2000. Effects of HDF1 (Ku70) and HDF2 (Ku80) on spontaneous and DNA damage-induced intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264:56–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clikeman, J. A., G. J. Khalsa, S. L. Barton, and J. A. Nickoloff. 2001. Homologous recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in yeast is enhanced by MAT heterozygosity through yKU-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genetics 157:579–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosgrove, A. J., C. A. Nieduszynski, and A. D. Donaldson. 2002. Ku complex controls the replication time of DNA in telomere regions. Genes Dev. 16:2485–2490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean, A., D. S. Pederson, and R. T. Simpson. 1989. Isolation of yeast plasmid chromatin. Methods Enzymol. 170:26–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ducker, C. E., and R. T. Simpson. 2000. The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome. EMBO J. 19:400–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldmann, H., L. Driller, B. Meier, G. Mages, J. Kellermann, and E. L. Winnacker. 1996. HDF2, the second subunit of the Ku homologue from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27765–27769.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank-Vaillant, M., and S. Marcand. 2002. Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 10:1189–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotta, M., and S. M. Gasser. 1996. Nuclear organization and transcriptional silencing in yeast. Experientia 52:1136–1147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haber, J. E. 1998. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:561–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, T., S. G. Martin, M. Gotta, H. C. Gorham, F. E. Pryde, E. J. Louis, and S. M. Gasser. 1998. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres. Curr. Biol. 8:653–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., and J. C. Reese. 2001. Ssn6-Tup1 regulates RNR3 by positioning nucleosomes and affecting the chromatin structure at the upstream repression sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 276:33788–33797.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longtine, M. S., A. McKenzie 3rd, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mages, G. J., H. M. Feldmann, and E. L. Winnacker. 1996. Involvement of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HDF1 gene in DNA double-strand break repair and recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 271:7910–7915.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manis, J. P., Y. Gu, R. Lansford, E. Sonoda, R. Ferrini, L. Davidson, K. Rajewsky, and F. W. Alt. 1998. Ku70 is required for late B cell development and immunoglobulin heavy chain class switching. J. Exp. Med. 187:2081–2089.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, S. G., T. Laroche, N. Suka, M. Grunstein, and S. M. Gasser. 1999. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell 97:621–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. H., D. S. Pederson, A. Dean, and R. T. Simpson. 1987. Yeast nucleosomes allow thermal untwisting of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:10311–10330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. 1983. Molecular analysis of a cell lineage. Nature 302:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S. Y., A. Dean, and R. T. Simpson. 1990. Yeast alpha 2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2247–2260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shakibai, N., V. Kumar, and S. Eisenberg. 1996. The Ku-like protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required in vitro for the assembly of a stable multiprotein complex at a eukaryotic origin of replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11569–11574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimizu, M., S. Y. Roth, C. Szent-Gyorgyi, and R. T. Simpson. 1991. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the alpha 2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 10:3033–3041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. T. 1990. Nucleosome positioning can affect the function of a cis-acting DNA element in vivo. Nature 343:387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, K., E. Coic, Z. Zhou, P. Durrens, and J. E. Haber. 2002. Saccharomyces forkhead protein Fkh1 regulates donor preference during mating-type switching through the recombination enhancer. Genes Dev. 16:2085–2096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szeto, L., M. K. Fafalios, H. Zhong, A. K. Vershon, and J. R. Broach. 1997. Alpha2p controls donor preference during mating type interconversion in yeast by inactivating a recombinational enhancer of chromosome III. Genes Dev. 11:1899–1911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamura, K., Y. Adachi, K. Chiba, K. Oguchi, and H. Takahashi. 2002. Identification of Ku70 and Ku80 homologues in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Plant J. 29:771–781.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker, J. R., R. A. Corpina, and J. Goldberg. 2001. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature 412:607–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, K. S., L. Szeto, and J. R. Broach. 1995. Mutations affecting donor preference during mating type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139:1495–1510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss, K., and R. T. Simpson. 1997. Cell type-specific chromatin organization of the region that governs directionality of yeast mating type switching. EMBO J. 16:4352–4360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, C., K. Weiss, C. Yang, M. A. Harris, B. K. Tye, C. S. Newlon, R. T. Simpson, and J. E. Haber. 1998. Mcm1 regulates donor preference controlled by the recombination enhancer in Saccharomyces mating-type switching. Genes Dev. 12:1726–1737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., and J. E. Haber. 1996. A 700 bp cis-acting region controls mating-type dependent recombination along the entire left arm of yeast chromosome III. Cell 87:277–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., and J. E. Haber. 1995. MATa donor preference in yeast mating-type switching: activation of a large chromosomal region for recombination. Genes Dev. 9:1922–1932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., J. K. Moore, and J. E. Haber. 1996. Mechanism of MATα donor preference during mating type switching of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:657–668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar