Combined Global Localization Analysis and Transcriptome Data Identify Genes That Are Directly Coregulated by Adr1 and Cat8

REFERENCES

• Allocco, D. J., I. S. Kohane, and A. J. Butte. 2004. Quantifying the relationship between co-expression, co-regulation and gene function. BMC Bioinformatics 5:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, M., R. K. Esch, and B. Errede. 1997. Cooperative binding interactions required for function of the Ty1 sterile responsive element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4330–4337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumberg, H., T. A. Hartshorne, and E. T. Young. 1988. Regulation of expression and activity of the yeast transcription factor ADR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1868–1876.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bojunga, N., and K. D. Entian. 1999. Cat8p, the activator of gluconeogenic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, regulates carbon source-dependent expression of NADP-dependent cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idp2p) and lactate permease (Jen1p). Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:869–875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bojunga, N., P. Kotter, and K. D. Entian. 1998. The succinate/fumarate transporter Acr1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is part of the gluconeogenic pathway and its expression is regulated by Cat8p. Mol. Gen. Genet. 260:453–461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brons, J. F., M. De Jong, M. Valens, L. A. Grivell, M. Bolotin-Fukuhara, and J. Blom. 2002. Dissection of the promoter of the HAP4 gene in S. cerevisiae unveils a complex regulatory framework of transcriptional regulation. Yeast 19:923–932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey, M., Y. S. Lin, M. R. Green, and M. Ptashne. 1990. A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives. Nature 345:361–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson, M. 1999. Glucose repression in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspary, F., A. Hartig, and H. J. Schuller. 1997. Constitutive and carbon source-responsive promoter elements are involved in the regulated expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae malate synthase gene MLS1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255:619–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Causton, H. C., B. Ren, S. S. Koh, C. T. Harbison, E. Kanin, E. G. Jennings, T. I. Lee, H. L. True, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Young. 2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:323–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbon, G., K. D. Breunig, R. Wattiez, J. Vandenhaute, and I. Noel-Georis. 2004. Key role of Ser562/661 in Snf1-dependent regulation of Cat8p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4083–4091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeRisi, J. L., V. R. Iyer, and P. O. Brown. 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vit, M. J., J. A. Waddle, and M. Johnston. 1997. Regulated nuclear translocation of the Mig1 glucose repressor. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:1603–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mauro, E., S. G. Kendrew, and M. Caserta. 2000. Two distinct nucleosome alterations characterize chromatin remodeling at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 275:7612–7618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Mauro, E., L. Verdone, B. Chiappini, and M. Caserta. 2002. In vivo changes of nucleosome positioning in the pretranscription state. J. Biol. Chem. 277:7002–7009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dombek, K. M., and E. T. Young. 1997. Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits ADH2 expression in part by decreasing expression of the transcription factor gene ADR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1450–1458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donoviel, M. S., N. Kacherovsky, and E. T. Young. 1995. Synergistic activation of ADH2 expression is sensitive to upstream activation sequence 2 (UAS2) orientation, copy number and UAS1-UAS2 helical phasing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3442–3449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Errede, B., and G. Ammerer. 1989. STE12, a protein involved in cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast, is part of protein-DNA complexes. Genes Dev. 3:1349–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferre, P., D. Azzout-Marniche, and F. Foufelle. 2003. AMP-activated protein kinase and hepatic genes involved in glucose metabolism. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31:220–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisberg, J. V., and K. Struhl. 2004. Cellular stress alters the transcriptional properties of promoter-bound Mot1-TBP complexes. Mol. Cell 14:479–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guarente, L. 1983. Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 101:181–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldener, U., S. Heck, T. Fielder, J. Beinhauer, and J. H. Hegemann. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2519–2524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haurie, V., M. Perrot, T. Mini, P. Jeno, F. Sagliocco, and H. Boucherie. 2001. The transcriptional activator Cat8p provides a major contribution to the reprogramming of carbon metabolism during the diauxic shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedges, D., M. Proft, and K. D. Entian. 1995. CAT8, a new zinc cluster-encoding gene necessary for derepression of gluconeogenic enzymes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1915–1922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiesinger, M., S. Roth, E. Meissner, and H. J. Schuller. 2001. Contribution of Cat8 and Sip4 to the transcriptional activation of yeast gluconeogenic genes by carbon source-responsive elements. Curr. Genet. 39:68–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knop, M., K. Siegers, G. Pereira, W. Zachariae, B. Winsor, K. Nasmyth, and E. Schiebel. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15:963–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, T., S. Wesche, N. Taheri, G. H. Braus, and H. U. Mosch. 2002. Dual role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TEA/ATTS family transcription factor Tec1p in regulation of gene expression and cellular development. Eukaryot. Cell 1:673–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kratzer, S., and H. J. Schuller. 1997. Transcriptional control of the yeast acetyl-CoA synthetase gene, ACS1, by the positive regulators CAT8 and ADR1 and the pleiotropic repressor UME6. Mol. Microbiol. 26:631–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurdistani, S. K., and M. Grunstein. 2003. In vivo protein-protein and protein-DNA crosslinking for genomewide binding microarray. Methods 31:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laybourn, P. J., and J. T. Kadonaga. 1992. Threshold phenomena and long-distance activation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science 257:1682–1685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, T. I., N. J. Rinaldi, F. Robert, D. T. Odom, Z. Bar-Joseph, G. K. Gerber, N. M. Hannett, C. T. Harbison, C. M. Thompson, I. Simon, J. Zeitlinger, E. G. Jennings, H. L. Murray, D. B. Gordon, B. Ren, J. J. Wyrick, J. B. Tagne, T. L. Volkert, E. Fraenkel, D. K. Gifford, and R. A. Young. 2002. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298:799–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, W. S., L. Duggan, N. C. Emre, R. Belotserkovskya, W. S. Lane, R. Shiekhattar, and S. L. Berger. 2001. Snf1—a histone kinase that works in concert with the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 to regulate transcription. Science 293:1142–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhani, H. D., and G. R. Fink. 1997. Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275:1314–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martone, R., G. Euskirchen, P. Bertone, S. Hartman, T. E. Royce, N. M. Luscombe, J. L. Rinn, F. K. Nelson, P. Miller, M. Gerstein, S. Weissman, and M. Snyder. 2003. Distribution of NF-κB-binding sites across human chromosome 22. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:12247–12252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahner, A., M. Hiesinger, and H. J. Schuller. 1999. Deregulation of gluconeogenic structural genes by variants of the transcriptional activator Cat8p of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 34:146–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randez-Gil, F., N. Bojunga, M. Proft, and K. D. Entian. 1997. Glucose derepression of gluconeogenic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae correlates with phosphorylation of the gene activator Cat8p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2502–2510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ren, B., F. Robert, J. J. Wyrick, O. Aparicio, E. G. Jennings, I. Simon, J. Zeitlinger, J. Schreiber, N. Hannett, E. Kanin, T. L. Volkert, C. J. Wilson, S. P. Bell, and R. A. Young. 2000. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290:2306–2309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S., J. Kumme, and H. J. Schuller. 2004. Transcriptional activators Cat8 and Sip4 discriminate between sequence variants of the carbon source-responsive promoter element in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 45:121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S., and H. J. Schuller. 2001. Cat8 and Sip4 mediate regulated transcriptional activation of the yeast malate dehydrogenase gene MDH2 by three carbon source-responsive promoter elements. Yeast 18:151–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, N. Suka, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392:831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, H. J. 2003. Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 43:139–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, J. S., K. M. Dombek, and E. T. Young. 1999. Post-translational regulation of Adr1 activity is mediated by its DNA binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274:37575–37582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, W. E., and E. T. Young. 1990. cAMP-dependent phosphorylation and inactivation of yeast transcription factor ADR1 does not affect DNA binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4098–4102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verdone, L., J. Wu, K. van Riper, N. Kacherovsky, M. Vogelauer, E. T. Young, M. Grunstein, E. Di Mauro, and M. Caserta. 2002. Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J. 21:1101–1111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent, O., and J. M. Gancedo. 1995. Analysis of positive elements sensitive to glucose in the promoter of the FBP1 gene from yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12832–12838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walther, K., and H. J. Schuller. 2001. Adr1 and Cat8 synergistically activate the glucose-regulated alcohol dehydrogenase gene ADH2 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 147:2037–2044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williamson, V. M., J. Bennetzen, E. T. Young, K. Nasmyth, and B. D. Hall. 1980. Isolation of the structural gene for alcohol dehydrogenase by genetic complementation in yeast. Nature 283:214–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, E. T., K. M. Dombek, C. Tachibana, and T. Ideker. 2003. Multiple pathways are co-regulated by the protein kinase Snf1 and the transcription factors Adr1 and Cat8. J. Biol. Chem. 278:26146–26158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young, E. T., N. Kacherovsky, and K. Van Riper. 2002. Snf1 protein kinase regulates Adr1 binding to chromatin but not transcription activation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:38095–38103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaragoza, O., O. Vincent, and J. M. Gancedo. 2001. Regulatory elements in the FBP1 promoter respond differently to glucose-dependent signals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 359:193–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar