Referencias

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres & Other Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking—A rethorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, R. (1972). Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary scholl children. Journal of Research in Science Education, 9 (2), 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R. & Treagut, D. (1998). Learning Science—From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond. En B. J. Frase & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. K. & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (5), 611–628.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as Argument. Havard Educational Review, 62, 155–178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (Trad. cast.: Aprender a hablar ciencia. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Machado, A. & Moura, A. (1995). Linguagem no ensino de química. Química Nova na Escola. nov (2), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in the classroom discourse: an example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F. & Machado, A. H. (1996). A linguagem numa aula de ciências. Presença Pedagógica, 2 (11), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior High School Pupils' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study. Science Education, 62 (3), 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. (1985). The Particulate Nature of Matter in the Gaseous Phase. En R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. (Trad. cast.: Ideas científicas de niños y adolescentes. Madrid: Morata, 1990)
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. & Mcgillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press. (Trad. cast.: Formas de explicar. La enseñanza de las ciencias en Secundaria. Madrid: Santillana, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Pozo, J. I. y Gómez Crespo, M. A. (1998). Aprender y enseñar ciencia. Madrid: Morata
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1979a). On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity. En R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 93–108). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1979b). On common codes and Dynamic residuals in human communication. En R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 163–175). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1979c). On common codes and Dynamic residuals in human communication. En R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakarv (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 163–175). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1979d). The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. University of Oslo. Typescript.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1996). Social Interactions and Personal Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. En G. Welford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe—Current Issue and Themes (pp. 325–336). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: A Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, L. S (1986). Those who understand: a conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10 (1), 9–15, 43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, C. R. (1992). Words, Science and Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulviste, P. (1991). The Cultural-Historical Development of Verbal Thinking. Trans. by M. J. Hall. Commak, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. (Trad. cast.: Voces d la mente. Madrid: Visor, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar