106
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

La comprensión de sentidos no literales en adolescentes sordos y oyentes

Understanding non-literal meanings in deaf and hearing adolescents

, &
Pages 343-358 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Ackerman, B. P. (1981). Young children's understanding of a speaker's intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology, 17, 472–480.
  • Ackerman, B. P. (1983). Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 487–508.
  • Broomfield, K. A., Robinson, E. J.& Robinson, W. P. (2002). Children's understanding about lies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 47–65.
  • Capelli, C. A., Nakagawa, N. & Madden, C. M. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development, 61, 1824–1841.
  • Creusere, M. A. (1999). Theories of adults' understanding and use of irony and sarcasm: Applications to and Evidence from Research with Children. Developmental Review, 19, 213–262.
  • De Villiers, P. A. (2005). The role of language in theory-of-mind development: What deaf children tell us. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 266–297). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Dews, S., Kaplan, J. & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367.
  • Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. En C. Mandell & A. Mccabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 377–414). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
  • Gilli, G., Marchetti, A., Siegal, M. & Peterson, C. (2001). Children's incipient ability to distinguish mistakes from lies: An Italian investigation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25 (1), 88–92.
  • González, A. M., Barajas, C., Linero, M. J. & Quintana, I. (2004). Deficiencia auditiva: Experiencia comunicativa, lenguaje y teoría de la mente. Revista FIAPAS, 99, I-XV.
  • González, A. M. & Quintana, I. (2006). Deficiencia auditiva y teoría de la mente. El efecto del formato de la tarea sobre la comprensión de la falsa creencia en niños y adolescentes sordos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29 (4), 471–484.
  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics; Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Hancock, J. T., Purdy, K. & Dunham, P. J. (2000). Children's comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1 (2), 227–248.
  • Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.
  • Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24 (2), 129–154.
  • Happé, F. G. E. (1998). Introducción al autismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Harris, R. J., Friel, B. M. & Mickelson, N. R. (2006). Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 863–879.
  • Kottoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: on cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1387–1411.
  • Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21.
  • Nippold, M. A. (1985). Comprehension of figurative language in youth. Topics in Language Disorders, 5 (3), 1–20.
  • Peskin, J. (1996). Guise and guile: Children's understanding of narratives in which the purpose of pretense is deception. Child Development, 67 (4), 1735–1751.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, 459–474.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (1998). Changing focus on the representational mind: Deaf, autistic and normal children's concepts of false photos, false drawings and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 301–320.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (1999). Representing inner worlds: Theory of mind in autistic, deaf and normal hearing children. Psychological Science, 10, 126–129.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (2000). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind & Language, 15, 123–145.
  • Peterson, C. C., Wellman, H. M. & Liu, D. (2005). Steps in theory-of-mind development for children with deafness or autism. Child Development, 76 (2), 502–517.
  • Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Science, 4, 515–526.
  • Roid, G. & Miller, L. (1996). Escala manipulativa internacional Leiter-R (revisada y ampliada, edición en español). Madrid: Ed. Symtéc.
  • Siegal, M. & Peterson, C. C. (1998). Preschoolers' understanding of lies and innocent and negligent mistakes. Developmental Psychology, 34 (2), 332–341.
  • Sinclair, A. (1996). Young children's practical deceptions and their understanding of false belief. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 157–173.
  • Sodian, B. (1994). Early deception and conceptual continuity claim. En C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 385–401). Hove, UK: Earlbaum.
  • Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P. L. & Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child's theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62, 468–483.
  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1994). La Relevancia. Comunicación y procesos cognitivos. Madrid: Visor.
  • Sullivan, K., Winner, E. & Hopfield, N. (1995). How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 191–204.
  • Winner, E. & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257–270.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.