Referencias

• Barberà, E. (2008). Aprender e-learning. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Callison, D. & Lamb, A. (2004). Key Words in Instruction: audience analysis. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21 (1), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cassany, D. (2002). Reparar la escritura, didáctica de la corrección de lo escrito. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Català, G., Comes, G. & Renom, J. (2001). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, E. S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer- assisted learning programmes. En K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 67–84). Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Kulik, J. & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: a Meta-analysis of Findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (2), 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, C. & Martí, E. (2001). La educación escolar ante las nuevas tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación. En C. Coll, J. Palacios & A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 623–653). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Cortesse, C. (2005). Learning trough Teaching. Management Learning, 36 (1), 87–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CURRICULUM, EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CENTRE (2004). Performance indicators in primary schools primary seven assessment. Durham, UK: Curriculum, Evaluation and Management Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. Internationaljournal of Educational Research, 13, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dekhinet, R., Topping, K. J., Duran, D. & Blanch, S. (2008). Let Me Learn with my peers online!: foreign language learning through reciprocal peer tutoring. Innovate. Journal of Online Education. [Revista electrónica], 4 (3). En http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=479 [Consulta: 16 de Marzo de 2009]
   Google Scholar
• Duran, D. (Ed.) (2006). Tutoría entre iguales: algunas prácticas. Monográfico de Aula de Innovación Educativa, 153–154, 7–39.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, D. & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequence of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning & Instruction, 15, 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, D. & Vidal, V. (2004). Tutoría entre iguales: de la teoría a la práctica. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. & Ginsburg-Block, M. (1998). Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. En K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp.121–145). Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K. & Grayson, N. (1990). An Evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., King, A. M. & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: a component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan, B. O. (1991). Peer tutoring and second language acquisition in the elementary school. Applied Linguistics, 12 (2), 142–158.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B. & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of students interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (1), 75–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, L. (2002). Gramática, didáctica del español. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, S. & Hist, B. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. Londres: K. Page.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. & Kamps, D. (1990). Teacher-mediated Versus Peer-mediated instruction: A review of advantages and disadvantages. En H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan & R. H. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 177–205). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. & Griffin, B. (1998). An Investigation of the Effects of reciprocal Peer Tutoring in Achievement, Self-Efficacy, and Test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 298–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyanani, T. C. & Pahuja, P. (1995). Effects of peer tutoring on abilities and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4a ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, T. M. (2007). Children's language networks in minority language immersion: What goes in may not come out. Language and Education, 21 (1), 46–65.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D., Ushioda, E., Appel, M. C., Moran, J., O'rourke, B. & Schwienhorst, K. (1999). Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail: Report on a bilateral project. CLCS Occasional Paper, 55. [en línea] www.eric.ed.gov [Consulta: 4 de Diciembre de 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Mcluckie, J. & Topping, K. J. (2004). Transferable Skills for Online Peer Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (5), 563–584.
   Google Scholar
• Melero, M.A. & Fernández, P. (1995). El aprendizaje entre iguales: el estado de la cuestión en Estados Unidos. En P. Fernández & M. A. Melero (Eds.), La interacción social en contextos Educativos (pp. 35–98). Madrid: S. XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Milian, M. & Camps, A. (2006). El razonamiento metalinguistico en el marco de las secuencias didácticas de gramática. En A. Camps (Ed.), Diálogo e investigación en las aulas. Investigaciones en didáctica de la lengua (pp. 25–54). Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Mominó, J. M., Sigalés, C. & Meneses, J. (2008). La escuela en la sociedad red. Internet en la educación primaria y secundaria. Barcelona: Ariel.
   Google Scholar
• Monereo, C. (Ed.) (2005). Internet y competencias básicas. Aprender a colaborar, a comunicarse, a participar, a aprender. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Person, N. K. & Graesser, A. G. (1999). Evolution of discourse during cross-age tutoring. En A. M. O'donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 69–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pell, T. & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (8), 847–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, C.A., Ginsburgh-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo J.W. & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted Learning: interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (2), 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. (2005). Email dialogue journaling: attitudes and impact on L2 reading performance. Educational Studies, 31 (2), 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2000). Tutoring by Peers, Family and Volunteers. Ginebra: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25 (6), 631–645.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. & Ehly, S. (Eds.) (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ & Londres, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Cambridge: University of Cambridge [Trad. cast. de G. Sánchez: Indagación dialógica. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001].
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Seecond language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity (Technical Report Number 17). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.
   Google Scholar