Referencias

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. En C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres an Other Late Essays (pp. 60–102). Traducción de V. W. MacGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bustos, A., Coll, C. & Engel, A. (2009). Presencia docente distribuida en redes asincronas de aprendizaje. Definición teórica y perspectiva multimétodo para su estudio. En F. Díaz-barriga, G. Hernández & M. Rigo (Eds.), Aprender y Enseñar con TIC en Educación Superior: Contribuciones del Socioconstructivismo (pp. 97–128). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin J. & Gupta, A. (2002). Notification for shared annotation of digital documents. En D. Wixon (Ed.), Proceedings of CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 89–96). Nueva York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camps, A., Guasch, O., Milian, M. & Ribas, T. (2007). El escrito en la oralidad: el texto intentado. Archivos de Ciencias d la Educación, 4a época, 1 (1), 231–251. http://www.fuentesmemoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.695/pr.695.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., Iñesta, A. & Monereo, C. (2009). Towards Self-regulated Academic Writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7 (3), 1107–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Cerratto-Pargman, T. (2003). Collaborating with writing tools. An instrumental perspective on the problem of computer supported collaborative activities. Interacting with Computers, 15, 737–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. J., Cottey, A., Constantinou, C. & Yeoh, O. C. (1990). Rights and obligations in student writing. En R. Clark, N. Fairclough, R. Ivanic, N. Mcleod, J. Thomas & P. Meara (Eds.), Language and power (pp. 85–102). Clevedon, Avon: BAAL and CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, C. (2001). Lenguaje, actividad y discurso en el aula. En C. Coll, J. Palacios & A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo Psicológico y educación. Psicología de la educación escolar II (pp. 387–415). Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, C., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J. & Rochera, Ma J. (1992). Actividad conjunta y habla: Una aproximación a los mecanismos de influencia educativa. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 59–60, 189–232.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, C., Onrubia, J. & Mauri, T. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: El ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, 346, 33–70.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. Nueva York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. En L. Ch. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the Classroom (pp. 153–182). Nueva York: Academic Press, INC.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1982). El lenguaje como semiotica social. La interpretation social del lenguaje y del significado. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens. Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (1995). Writing and Identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1983). Thematic Analysis: Systems, Structures, and Strategies. Semiotic Inquiry, 3, 159–187.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1997). Aprender a hablar ciencia. Lenguaje, aprendizaje y valores. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2001). Student Writing: Acces, Regulation, Desire. Londres: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A. & Lowry, M. R. (2004). A taxonomy of collaborative writing to improve empirical research, writing practice, and tool development. Journal of Business Communication (JBC), 41 (1), 66–99.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Londres: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland-Smith, W. (2006). Writing as tribal practice: Revisiting online collaborative writing. AARE international conference: Educational pedagogies: the risks and dilemmas. 27 November- 1 December 2006, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. En M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Sou- Berman (Eds.), Mind in Society (pp. 79–81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weng, C. & Gennari, J. (2004). Asynchronous collaborative writing through annotations. En J. Herbsleb & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW04 (pp. 578–581). Nueva York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Londres: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2006). Case study methods. En J. Green, G. Camilli & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research (pp. 111–122). Londres: AERA/LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., Booth, K. & Mcgrenere, J. (2006). Co-Authoring with Structured Annotations. En R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 131–140). Nueva York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar