References
- Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development, 23 (1), 48–66.
- Ambridge, B. (2010). Review of I. Gülzow & N.Gargarina: “Frequency effects in language acquisition: defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept”. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Journal of Child Language, 37 (2), 453–460.
- Ambridge, B. & Rowland, C. F. (2009). Predicting children's errors with negative questions: Testing a schema- combination account. Cognitive Linguistics, 20 (2), 225–266.
- Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants' reasoning about the physical and spatial properties of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 179–200.
- Case, R. (1985). Intellectual Development: Birth to Adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
- Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113 (2), 234–272.
- Dabrowska, E. & Szczerbiński, M. (2006). Polish children's productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity. Journal of Child Language, 33 (3), 559–597.
- Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. & Gobet, F. (2009). Simulating the referential properties of Dutch, German and English Root Infinitives in MOSAIC. Language Learning and Development, 5, 1–29.
- Gertner, Y., Fisher, C. & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 11 (8), 684–691.
- Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Naigles, L. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language, 25 (1), 95–120.
- Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A. & Lieven, E. (2009). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36 (5), 1091–1114.
- Lieven, E. (2008). Learning the English auxiliary: A Usage-based Approach. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: Finding Structure in Data (Trends in Language Acquisition Research, Vol. 6) (pp. 60–98). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
- Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120, 2546–2556.
- Munakata, Y., Mcclelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H. & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104 (4), 686–713.
- Naigles L., Hoff, E. & Vear, D. (2009) Flexibility in Early Verb Use: Evidence from a Multiple-n Diary Study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vi-139 (Serial no: 293).
- Noble, C., Rowland, C. & Pine, J. (in press). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from infants and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Developmental Science.
- Rowland, C. F. (2007). Explaining errors in children's questions. Cognition, 104 (1), 106–134.
- Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71 (1), 26–35.
- Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28 (1), 127–152.
- Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2002). Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’. Journal of Child Language, 29 (4), 783–811.
- Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2005). The acquisition of auxiliary Syntax: BE and HAVE. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 247–277.
- Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M. & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34 (6), 1289–1309.