Referencias

• Alameda, J. R. & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo: Universidad de oviedo.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinelli, G. & Grube, J. W. (2003). Tobacco counter-advertising: A review of the literature and a conceptual model for understanding effects. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 107–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J., Prieto, L. & Antó, J. M. (1995). La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Medicina Clínica, 104, 771–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Optimistic bias in adolescent and adults smokers and non smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 25 (4), 625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, B. W. & Hinson, R. E. (2001). Is smoking automatic? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 59–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blener, L. & Taylor, T. M. (2002). The continuing importance of emotion in tobacco control media campaigns: A response to Hastings and MacFadyen. Tobacco Control, 11 (1), 75–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S. & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (3), 443–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, W. M. & Klinger, E. (2004). A motivational model of alcohol use: Determinants of use and change. En W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Concepts, Approaches, and Assessment (pp. 121–138). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, A., Cabestrero, R., Grzib, G. & Quirós, P. (2007). Visual attention to health warnings in tobacco advertisements: An eye-tracking research between smokers and non-smokers. Studia Psychologica, 49 (1), 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, A., Barrio, A., Cabestrero, R. & Hernández, O. (2008). Cognitive processing and assessment of anti-smoking combined warning labels proposed by the European Commission: an empirical study with a Spanish sample. Psychology in Spain, 12 (1), 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, TH., Harris, J., Cabaco, A. S., Capataz, I. & Crespo, A. (2003). The emotional stroop task: An adequate predictor of vulnerability to eating disorders? Psychologica, 33, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M. C., Niederdeppe, J. & Yarsevich, J. (2003). Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: Past, present, and future directions. Tobacco Control, 12, 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, M., Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Eye movements to smoking-related cues: Effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology, 173 (1–2), 116–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken, I. H. A., Kroon, L. Y., Wiers, R. W. & Jansen, A. (2000). Selective cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 14, 395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandpre, J., Alvaro, E. M., Burgoon, M., Miller, C. H., & Hall, J. R. (2003). Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Journal of Health Communication, 15 (3), 349–366.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, T. M., Jarvik, M. E. & Rosenblatt, M. R. (1993). Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific Stroop interference. Psychopharmacology, 110, 333–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, G. & Mcfadyen, L. (2002). The limitation of fear messages. Tobacco Control, 11, 73–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, B. H., Thayer, J. F., Laberg, J. & Asbjornsen, A. (1997). Attentional bias in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers. Addictive Behavior, 22, 813–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, P. M. & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Using tobacco-industry marketing research to design more effective tobacco-control campaigns. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (22), 2983–2989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh, L. G. & Czyzykow-Czarnocka, S. (2001). Priming of the emotional Stroop effect by a schema questionnaire. An experimental study of test order. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Mccusker, C. G. (2001). Cognitive biases and addiction: An evolution in theory and method. Addiction, 96 (1), 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccusker, C. G. & Gettings, B. (1997). Automaticity of cognitive biases in addictive behaviours: Further evidence with gamblers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 543–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenna, F. P. & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1595–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milam, J. E., Sussman, S., Ritt-Olson, A. & Dent, C. W. (2000). Perceived invulnerability and cigarette smoking among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 25 (1), 71–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MINISTERIO Desanidad Y Consumode España (2002). Real Decreto 1079/2002, de 18 de octubre, por el que se regulan los contenidos máximos de nicotina, alquitrán y monóxido de carbono de los cigarrillos, el etiquetado de los productos, así como las medidas relativas a ingredientes y denominaciones de los productos del tabaco. BOE no 251 de 19 de octubre de 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (2002). Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: Manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 16 (4), 385–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munafo, M., Mogg, K., Roberts, S., Bradley, B. P. & Murphy, M. (2003). Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17 (3), 310–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. H., Pickering, A. D. Dawkins, L., Westb, R. & Powell, J. F. (2004). Cognitive and psychological correlates of smoking abstinence, and predictors of successful cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1407–1426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell, J., Tait, S. & Lessiter, J. (2002). Cigarette smoking and attention to signals of reward and treat in the Stroop paradigm. Addiction, 97 (9), 1163–1170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Review, 18, 247–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (2000). The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: An incentive-sensitization view. Addiction, 95 (Suppl. 2), S91–S117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D., Albery, I. P. & Cook, C. (2000). Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction, 96, 285–295.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., De Wit, H. & Eikelboom, R. (1984). Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Review, 91, 251–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behaviour: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J. E. & Sherbourne, D. C. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (sf-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30 (6), 473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, A. J. & Feyerabend, C. (2000). Determinants and effects of attentional bias on smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters A. J., Shiffman S., Bradley, B. P. & Mogg, K. (2003). Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction, 98 (10), 1409–1417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein, A. & Cox, W. M. (2006). Cognitive processing of drug-related stimuli: The role of memory and attention. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20 (6), 850–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, A. M., Feldtkeller, B., Malizia, A., Wilson, S., Bailey, J. E. & Nutt, D. (1998). Integrating the cognitive and physiological aspects of craving. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12 (1), 31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, J. M. & Sayette, M. A. (2001a). Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15 (3), 268–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, J. M. & Sayette, M. A. (2001b). A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity on self-reported urge. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., Watts, F. N., Mcleod, C. M. & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive, Psychology and Emotional Disorders (2a ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., Mathews, A. & Macleod, C. M. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120 (1), 3–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, M., Belsito, L., Scher, R., Eissenberg, T. & Corrigall, W. A. (2001). Effects of abstinence and smoking on information processing in adolescent smokers. Psychopharmacology, 153, 249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar