References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2008). Toward an agentic theory of the self. In H. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Advances in Self Research, Vol. 3: Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential (pp. 15–49). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Test of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beas, M. I., & Salanova, M. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs, computer training and psychological well-being among Information and Communication Technology workers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1043–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresó, E., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). In search of the ‘third dimension’ of burnout. Applied Psychology: an international review, 56, 460–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresó, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A Quasi-experimental Study. Higher Education, 61, 339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telander, K., Fan, X., & Lent, R. W. (2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students' academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 298–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. (2007). Attribution style, self-efficacy, and stress as predictors of academic success and academic satisfaction in college students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68, 874–874.
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, S., & Glaser, J. (2010). Employee responses to relational fulfilment and work-life benefits. International Journal of Manpower, 31, 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Basic Concepts and Fundamental Issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling, Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. S., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Katzel, R. A., & Thompson, D. E. (1990). Work motivation: theory and practice. American Psychologist, 45, 144–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. (2004). A cross-cultural investigation of the efficacy beliefs of South Asian immigrant and Anglo non-immigrant early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 731–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Taveira, M. C., Sheu, H-B., & Singley, D. (2009). Social cognitive predictors of academic adjustment and life satisfaction in Portuguese college students: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden, J. A., Chaney, L. H., Danehower, V. C., & Houston, D. A. (2002). Anchoring, attributions, and self-efficacy: an examination of interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelso, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs: Jointly contributing to the quality of human life. In H. Marsh, R. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 2, pp. 95–121). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J., & Martínez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses' extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2256–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Research, 34, 43–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Peiró, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: an extension of the job demands-control model. European Journal on Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Sommer, S. M. (2000). Self-efficacy and causal attributions: Direct and reciprocal links. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 707–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M. T., & Holbert, R. L. (2003). A Monte Carlo simulation of observable-versus latentvariable structural equation modeling techniques. Communication Research, 300, 332–354.
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1146–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., Thomson C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wood R. E., Goodman J. S., Beckmann N., & Cook, A. (2008). Mediation Testing in Management Research: A Review and Proposals. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (2), 270–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar