Referencias

• Expósito, F., Moya, M. C. & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. Revista de psicología Social, 13 (2), 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. En J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 61–89). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Lameiras, M. & Castro, Y. (2002). Education and catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles 47, 9–10, 433–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladanic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J., Akande, A., Alao, A., Brunner, A., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Exposito, F., Moya, M., Foddy, M., Kim, H. J., Lameiras, M., Sotelo, M. J., Muchi-Faina, A., Romani, M., Sakalli, N., Udegbe, B., Yamamoto, M., Ui, M., Ferreira, M. C. & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Pschology, 33, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcconahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence and the modern racism scale. En J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice and discrimination: Theory and research, (pp. 91–126). Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montes-Berges, B. (2002). Discriminación de género en situaciones de competición y cooperación con priming subliminal. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Montes-Berges, B. & Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2002). Amenaza percibida hacia los homosexuales en relación con el poder. Estudio experimental realizado en la Universidad de Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Montes-Berges, B. & Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2003). ¿Puede explicar la teoría de la dominancia social la discriminación de género en España? Encuentros en Psicología Social, 1 (1), 176–179.
   Google Scholar
• Moya, M. C. & Expósito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones españoles. Psicothema, 13 (4), 643–649
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., James, L. H. J., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M. & Bachrach, H. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation and the legitimation of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31 (3), 369–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. En P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). Nueva York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. Journal of Psychology, 127 (3), 311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Rabinowitz, J. L. & Federico, C. M. (1999). Peering into the jaws of the beast. The integrative dynamics of social identity, symbolic racism, and social dominance. En D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 80–132). Nueva York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1993). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. En P. Snyderman & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics and race in America today (pp. 173–211). Stanford: Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Bobo, L. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (6), 998–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. En S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M. & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (8), 842–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hiel, A. & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: a comparisosn of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar