Referencias

• Asch, S. (1952). Social Psychology. Nueva Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. H, Paternine, C. E. & Sherman, R. C. (1999). A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. En P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group Influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S. & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146.
   Google Scholar
• ESTUDIO GENERAL DE MEDIOS (EGM). (2002). Usuarios de Internet. Obtenido de Internet el 18 de junio de 2002 en: http://www.aimc.es.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Pepitone, A. & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 47, 382–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaloy, F., Espelt, E. & Cornejo, J. M. (2001). Internet y movimientos sociales: un enfoque psicocosocial. Anuario de Psicología, 32, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. D. & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior Journal of Per sonality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & Mcguire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. A. & Moreggi, D. (1998). Internet therapy and self help groups—the pros and cons. En J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications (pp. 77–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le BON. G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. París: Félix Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., O'shea, T., Fung, P. & Spears, R. (1992). ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. En M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89–112). Londres: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., Spears, R. & De Groot, D. (2001). Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonimity Effects on Social Identity Processes Within Groups. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 526–537.
   Google Scholar
• Lindskold, S. & Propst, L. R. (1980). Deindividuation, self-awareness and impression management. En J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological theory (pp. 201–221). Nueva York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna, K. & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral, F. (2000). Las relaciones sociales en Internet. En II Congreso Nacional. Internet y Psicología. Toledo, marzo.
   Google Scholar
• Moral, F. (2001a). Aspectos psicosociales de la comunicación y de las relaciones personales en Internet. Anuario de Psicología, 2, 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Moral, F. (2001b). Influencia social en comunicación mediada por ordenador. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Málaga.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, J. F. (1996). Introducción. En J. F. Morales, D. Páez, J. C. Deschamps & S. Worchel, Identidad social. Aproximaciones psicosociales a los grupos y las relaciones entre los grupos (pp. 5–9). Valencia: Promolibro.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. & Floyd, K. (1995). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and Antinormative Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? SIDE-Effects of Computer-Mediated Comunication Communication Research, 6, 689–715.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 503–513.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior En P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 86–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1984a). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1984b). The St. Pauls riot: An explication of de limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. Europeam Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. En J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 171–202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–199.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness. Multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3, 475–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, D. R. (1984). Looking and Seeing: The role of visual communication in social interaction. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Nueva York: Harpe.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. & Mcguire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. OrgaNIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 37, 157–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Lea M. & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communications. British Journal of Social Plychology, 29, 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence a the ‘social’ in computer-mediated communication. En M. Lea (Ed.) Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30–65). Londres: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Doosje, B. & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social group: studies in the social Psychology of intergroup relation. Londres: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tafjel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroups Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1989). La teoria de la identidad social de la conducta intergrupal. En J. F. Morales & C. Huici (Eds.), Lecturas de Psicología Social (pp. 225–259). Madrid: UNED.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (1997). La vida en la pantalla. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1990). Redescubrir el grupo social. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, P. (2001). La Psicología d Internet. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziller, R. C. (1964). Individuation and socialization. Humans Relations, 17, 341–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. En W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar