Referencias

• Altmeyer, B. (1981). Right wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D. & Haslam, S. A. (En prensa). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review.
   Google Scholar
• Gellately, R. (2001). Backing Hitler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, C., Banks, C. & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. & Mcgarty, C. (2001). A hundred years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertainty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming a social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469–1479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. & Reicher, S. D. (2002). A study guide to The Experiment—Exploring the psychology of groups and power: Manual to accompany the BBC Video. Londres: BBC Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. (1995). Age of extremes: The short twentieth century 1914–1991. Londres: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 51, 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Koppel, G. (Productor de la serie) & MIRSKY, N. (Productor ejecutivo) (14, 15, 20, 21 de Mayo, 2002), The Experiment. Londres: British Broadcasting Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, L. (2002). The Nazis: A warning from history. Londres: BBC Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1996). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. En P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317–336). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. & Haslam, S. A. (En preparación). Powerless groups and the emergence of tyranny: The BBC Prison Experiment. Manuscrito enviado para publicación.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Social psychology, science, and surveillance: Understanding The Experiment. Social Psychological Review, 5, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. & Hopkins, N. (1996). Seeking influence through characterising self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. J. & Platow, M. J. (2003). Why power in organizations really should be shared: Understanding power through the perils of powerlessness. En S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 173–188). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N. & Haslam S. A. (Eds.) (1997). The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978) The achievement of group differentiation. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77–98). Londres: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. En N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. En M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25–65). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social, group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M. & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. (1989). Quiet rage: The Stanford Prison Study video. Stanford: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G., Maslach, C. & Haney, C. (1999). Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences. En T. Blass (Ed.), Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm (pp. 193–237). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar