Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 22, 2007 - Issue 2
108
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Marketing político y conducta de voto. La influencia de variables psicosociales en la estabilidad del voto

Political marketing and voting. Influence of psychosocial variables on vote stability

, &
Pages 113-124 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Abramson, P. R. (1975). Generational Change in American Politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sandford, N. (1950) The authoritarian personality. Buenos Aires: Proyección.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1988) Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: Manitoba University Press.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1994). Reducing prejudice in right-wing authoritarians. En M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.). The Psychology of Prejudice: The Ontario Symposium 7 (pp. 47–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian spectra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 30 (pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Bustillos, A. & Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2005). Social dominance and Authoritarianism: Differential mediation with Blatant and Subtle Prejudice. 14th General Meeting EAESP. Wuzburg, Alemania.
  • Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J. & Klelman, S. (2005). The motivational Bases of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relations to Values and Attitudes in Aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (10), 1425–1434.
  • Converse, P. E. (1964). The Nature of belief System in Mass Publics. En D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206–261). Nueva York: Free Press.
  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 33 (pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Du Plessis, I. & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.
  • Duriez, B. & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.
  • Greenstein, F. I. (1965). Children and Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Harries, O. (1984). A Premier for Polemicist. Comentary, 78, 57–60.
  • Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. (2005). Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, and Support for Intergroup Violence Between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26 (4), 569–583.
  • Herrera, M. & Seoane, J. (1989). Actitudes e ideología política. En A. Rodríguez & J. Seoane (Eds.), Creencias, actitudes y valores (pp. 409–449). Madrid: Alhambra.
  • Jennings, M. & Niemi, R. G. (1974). The Political Character of Adolescence: The influence of Families and Schools. Priceton: Priceton University Press.
  • Lane, R. E. & Sears, D. O. (1964). La opinión pública. Barcelona: Fontanella.
  • Laufer, R. & Paradiese, C. (1990). Marketing Democracy: Public Opinion and Media Formation in Democratic Societies. New Brunswick: Transaction Press
  • Lippa, R. & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493.
  • Lazarsfield, P. F., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
  • Martín, L. (2002). Marketing político. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
  • Meloen, J. D. (1993). The F-scale as a predictor of Fascism: An overview of 40 years of Authoritarianism research. En W. F. Stone, G. Lederer & R. Christie (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today (pp. 47–69). Nueva York: springer verlag.
  • Montes-Berges, B. & Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2004). Dominancia social y neosexismo: Relación con las actitudes hacia los programas de acción afirmativa. Revista de Psicología Social, 19 (3), 275–285.
  • Peterson, B., Doty, R. M. & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (2), 174–184.
  • Peterson, B. & Duncan, L. E. (1999). Authoritarianism of parents and offspring. Intergenerational politics and adjustment to college. Journal of Research in Personality, 33 (4), 494–513.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
  • Pratto, F., Liu, J., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Brachrach, H. & Hergaty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimisation for inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A Personality variable relevant to social roles and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J. & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 37–53.
  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sabucedo, J. M. (1996). Psicología Política. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Schwartz, SH. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 1–65.
  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (6), 998–1100.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Brief, D. (1994). Group dominance and the political psychology of gender: A cross-cultural comparison. Political Psychology, 16, 381–396.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C. & Levin, S. (2004). The social dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method. Political Psychology, 25 (6), 845–800.
  • Silván-ferrero, M. P. & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 22 (1), 3–15.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. En S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Van Hiel A. & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965–976.
  • Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M. & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (7), 824–837.
  • Vaus, D. A. (2002). Social surveys: an overview. En D. A. Vaus (Ed.), Social Surveys, vol. 1 (pp. 1–36). Londres: Sage Publications.
  • Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77 (1), 126–134.
  • Zick, A. & Petzel, T. (1999). Authoritarianism, racism and ideologies about acculturation. Politics, Groups and the individual, 8, 41–64.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.